NO on ROW, Yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3). Our ROW neighborhood was not built to withstand this traffic and it would have a devastating effect on our community, a community that we're working hard to maintain and improve. For the good of our community and the safety of our children please YES on Hawthorne (Alternative 3).
D
Dennis Smith
8 years ago
Not on our Backyards! Option 3 Hawthorne Blvd is the best option for all of us.
B
Barbara Ramirez
8 years ago
NO on ROW..... keep this out of our neighborhood!
S
Sarah Straton
8 years ago
I’m very concerned about the impact of noise and vibration in the residential area.
P
Pedro Moises Alfaro
8 years ago
No on row, yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3)
V
Valerie Alfaro
8 years ago
No on row, yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3)
J
Juan gradailla
8 years ago
No on row, yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3)
C
Christian Alfaro
8 years ago
No on row, yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3)
E
Eustaquio Alfaro
8 years ago
No on ROW, Yes on Hawthorne Blvd (Alternative 3)
P
Patricia Alfaro
8 years ago
No on ROW, Yes on Hawthorne Blvd (Alternative 3)
P
Patricia Smith
8 years ago
We are against the train behind our homes due to noise, safety issues, possible health issues, privacy issues, properly value issues and so on. Please choose option 3 Hawthorne Blvd.
S
Spencer Trombley
8 years ago
Options 1 and 2 are wasting tax money and are taking the easy way out. Option three requires a little more work and a little more funding but is forward thinking and protecting the residents and businesses long into the future. Do not use short sighted goals as a method to justify a poorly planned route that does not serve the intended audience. Train ridership should be about eliminating the use of cars, not creating park and ride stations that become black holes during off peak hours and weekends. The metro stops need to be strategically placed to be destinations within themselves. Generators of business and human activity. Hawthorne Blvd is the right place for this line.
M
Mary Jennings
8 years ago
Alternative 3 is the most pro resident, pro rider, and pro business choice. Metro what do you gain by your anti rider, anti business and anti residence stance?
S
Sean Cregg
8 years ago
NO on ROW! Yes on Hawthorne - Alternative 3. Alternatives 1,2, & 4 would be a disaster, destroy the quality of life for the residents, and severely impact home values.
I’m for metro through Hawthorne
NO on ROW, Yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3). Our ROW neighborhood was not built to withstand this traffic and it would have a devastating effect on our community, a community that we're working hard to maintain and improve. For the good of our community and the safety of our children please YES on Hawthorne (Alternative 3).
Not on our Backyards! Option 3 Hawthorne Blvd is the best option for all of us.
NO on ROW..... keep this out of our neighborhood!
I’m very concerned about the impact of noise and vibration in the residential area.
No on row, yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3)
No on row, yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3)
No on row, yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3)
No on row, yes on Hawthorne (Alternative 3)
No on ROW, Yes on Hawthorne Blvd (Alternative 3)
No on ROW, Yes on Hawthorne Blvd (Alternative 3)
We are against the train behind our homes due to noise, safety issues, possible health issues, privacy issues, properly value issues and so on. Please choose option 3 Hawthorne Blvd.
Options 1 and 2 are wasting tax money and are taking the easy way out. Option three requires a little more work and a little more funding but is forward thinking and protecting the residents and businesses long into the future. Do not use short sighted goals as a method to justify a poorly planned route that does not serve the intended audience. Train ridership should be about eliminating the use of cars, not creating park and ride stations that become black holes during off peak hours and weekends. The metro stops need to be strategically placed to be destinations within themselves. Generators of business and human activity. Hawthorne Blvd is the right place for this line.
Alternative 3 is the most pro resident, pro rider, and pro business choice. Metro what do you gain by your anti rider, anti business and anti residence stance?
NO on ROW! Yes on Hawthorne - Alternative 3. Alternatives 1,2, & 4 would be a disaster, destroy the quality of life for the residents, and severely impact home values.
No on ROW, Yes on Hawthorne (Alt 3)
No on ROW, Yes on Hawthorne (Alt 3)
No on ROW. Yes on H!
Alternative 3!
No on ROW, Yes on H