pollution and noise. not appropriate for a residential neighborhood.
M
Michael Colvin
12 years ago
It's time to take seriously the propsal to terminate Line 8 near the Interstate MAX line.
A
A Ehelebe
12 years ago
Only sites 1 and 11 are actively being considered by TriMet, with site 10 as a fallback position. The other sites have been taken off TriMet's list of possibilities. Site 11 is next to a residence and across the street from a few residences and next to a pet hospital.
S
Susan Tillinghast
12 years ago
Woodlawn is not a good location for the layover station! Listen to your planners, your customers, and neighbors who are impacted by TriMet decisions!
S
Susan Tillinghast
12 years ago
Woodlawn is not a good location for the layover station! Don't try to force this on the neighborhood!
I
ilene
12 years ago
Featured
I oppose the 6 most-SW sites being considered -- esp. #7, #6 and #2, but also #1, #9, and #10. These are all much too close to residential neighborhoods. Of TriMet's 2 preferred sites, #11 is much more appropriately located in a more industrial/commercial zone on the north side of Lombard.
S
Susan moffatt
12 years ago
A layover in our neighborhood should not be considered.
F
Felicia Ferruzza
12 years ago
Please do not layover in this location. We are concerned about the health and safety of our community! Thank you
M
Mira Conklin
12 years ago
Please respect the wishes and well-being of those that this decision would affect most.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
I do not want a tri-met lay over in woodlawn.
A
Amy Longeteig
12 years ago
Featured
Not only is the bus layover site near an elderly and disabled community center, it is also near a children's daycare / preschool center. I think the health of our elderly and young children is a top priority and Tri-met should find another layover location.
B
Bettina Hammersley Rys
12 years ago
NO bus layover @ MLK & Dekum. Please respect our residents!
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
The Woodlawn location demonstrates bad planning on the part of tri-met. Consider options that do not impact local residents. This area is too population dense.
J
Joe Rowe
12 years ago
stop the bus mess. get this line back to Jantzen Beach.
J
Joe Rowe
12 years ago
stop the bus mess. get this line back to Jantzen Beach.
R
Rachel Hadi
12 years ago
Featured
As a resident of one of the houses overlooking the proposed #1 site, I can say that this horrible plan would dramatically decrease quality of life for the 19+ residents of these houses. My 2 year old son is already awakened EARLY in the morning (before 6am) by loud PA announcements that "bus is turning" - I shudder to think what my newborn will have to live through in terms of noise pollution and air quality if this site is developed in the proposed way. Buses would be coming in steadily until 2am, then starting again at 5am.... all with those "mandatory" PA announcements.... right outside our windows.
E
Erika Stanley
12 years ago
I support Trimet finding a good solution to this issue, but the proposed space for line 8 layovers is a really bad idea.
M
Marisa M
· petition starter
12 years ago
A permanent layover site on Dekum is bad for both residents and businesses in our neighborhood. I'm against a permanent layover site in Woodlawn.
K
Kirby Kuehl
12 years ago
As a home owner within one city block of the proposed site 1 location, I oppose the permanent site layover in Woodlawn.
pollution and noise. not appropriate for a residential neighborhood.
It's time to take seriously the propsal to terminate Line 8 near the Interstate MAX line.
Only sites 1 and 11 are actively being considered by TriMet, with site 10 as a fallback position. The other sites have been taken off TriMet's list of possibilities. Site 11 is next to a residence and across the street from a few residences and next to a pet hospital.
Woodlawn is not a good location for the layover station! Listen to your planners, your customers, and neighbors who are impacted by TriMet decisions!
Woodlawn is not a good location for the layover station! Don't try to force this on the neighborhood!
I oppose the 6 most-SW sites being considered -- esp. #7, #6 and #2, but also #1, #9, and #10. These are all much too close to residential neighborhoods. Of TriMet's 2 preferred sites, #11 is much more appropriately located in a more industrial/commercial zone on the north side of Lombard.
A layover in our neighborhood should not be considered.
Please do not layover in this location. We are concerned about the health and safety of our community! Thank you
Please respect the wishes and well-being of those that this decision would affect most.
I do not want a tri-met lay over in woodlawn.
Not only is the bus layover site near an elderly and disabled community center, it is also near a children's daycare / preschool center. I think the health of our elderly and young children is a top priority and Tri-met should find another layover location.
NO bus layover @ MLK & Dekum. Please respect our residents!
The Woodlawn location demonstrates bad planning on the part of tri-met. Consider options that do not impact local residents. This area is too population dense.
stop the bus mess. get this line back to Jantzen Beach.
stop the bus mess. get this line back to Jantzen Beach.
As a resident of one of the houses overlooking the proposed #1 site, I can say that this horrible plan would dramatically decrease quality of life for the 19+ residents of these houses. My 2 year old son is already awakened EARLY in the morning (before 6am) by loud PA announcements that "bus is turning" - I shudder to think what my newborn will have to live through in terms of noise pollution and air quality if this site is developed in the proposed way. Buses would be coming in steadily until 2am, then starting again at 5am.... all with those "mandatory" PA announcements.... right outside our windows.
I support Trimet finding a good solution to this issue, but the proposed space for line 8 layovers is a really bad idea.
A permanent layover site on Dekum is bad for both residents and businesses in our neighborhood. I'm against a permanent layover site in Woodlawn.
As a home owner within one city block of the proposed site 1 location, I oppose the permanent site layover in Woodlawn.