Tell Boulder City Council "NO" on the proposed Co-op Ordinance
225 Comments
A
Anonymous
· petition starter
10 years ago
Testing
L
Lynne Jacobs
10 years ago
This would be very detrimental to an quiet , respectful neighborhood, and create a lot of noise problems if this were allowed to happen!
J
John
10 years ago
I am averse to co-ops (and short-term rentals) for the neighborhood disruption - parking, noise, transience, etc. as well as the zoning violations they present. Thank you.
J
John Roberts
10 years ago
Density, density everywhere and not a drop of think.
D
Donna Pyle
10 years ago
Not in my back yard!!!!!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Please move slowly on this. We need to have common sense housing rules and more than 3 unrelated people makes absolutely no sense!
D
David and Marsha Budz
10 years ago
NO to co-op
J
Jennifer Eisenlau
10 years ago
More people = more cars! The roads in Table Mesa, and other parts of Boulder, cannot accommodate more traffic. Please vote NO!
S
Susan Davis Lambert
10 years ago
Stop shoving high-density infill into established, low-density to medium density neighborhoods, Boulder!
J
Jill Hammel
10 years ago
Another bad idea!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Another "solution" for Boulder which will create more problems.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I consider co-ops inappropriate or this neighborhood.
M
Michele Bishop
10 years ago
Should apply to all zoning. Absolutely no rental co-ops.
J
Judi Rudd
10 years ago
I cannot support the intrusion of Co-ops in to neighborhoods. The intrusions does not make sense and is not justified under any critera.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This is an over simplification of a problem that will lead to far greater problems and the only one who will benefit are the developers. STOP this before the damage is done.
R
Rachel Dahl
10 years ago
I say NO! to proposed Co-op Ordinance
R
Richard Thayer
10 years ago
The number of permisssible peope is far too large - the max should be no more than 6. Also, it should be made slear that historic districts are not subject to the ordinance due to the profound change a coop would make in the historical nature fo the neighborhood.
B
Barry gammell
10 years ago
We already have "Co-Ops" in this neighborhood. They are disguised as rental units that exceed the existing occupancy standards creating parking problems, late night traffic, excessive noise, unkempt landscaping etc. We do not need Co-Ops to make these problems legal.
J
Jean Aschenbrenner
10 years ago
If the proposed ordinance is accepted, parking will be a major problem since it is likely that each person living in the unit will have a vehicle. This puts unfair parking burden on the neighborhood. I have seen this where I live when 4 unrelated people live in a rented house.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I am not opposed to the concept of coops, just not in the form of the current ordinance. In fact, it is a terrible ordinance for being able to manage coops.
Testing
This would be very detrimental to an quiet , respectful neighborhood, and create a lot of noise problems if this were allowed to happen!
I am averse to co-ops (and short-term rentals) for the neighborhood disruption - parking, noise, transience, etc. as well as the zoning violations they present. Thank you.
Density, density everywhere and not a drop of think.
Not in my back yard!!!!!
Please move slowly on this. We need to have common sense housing rules and more than 3 unrelated people makes absolutely no sense!
NO to co-op
More people = more cars! The roads in Table Mesa, and other parts of Boulder, cannot accommodate more traffic. Please vote NO!
Stop shoving high-density infill into established, low-density to medium density neighborhoods, Boulder!
Another bad idea!
Another "solution" for Boulder which will create more problems.
I consider co-ops inappropriate or this neighborhood.
Should apply to all zoning. Absolutely no rental co-ops.
I cannot support the intrusion of Co-ops in to neighborhoods. The intrusions does not make sense and is not justified under any critera.
This is an over simplification of a problem that will lead to far greater problems and the only one who will benefit are the developers. STOP this before the damage is done.
I say NO! to proposed Co-op Ordinance
The number of permisssible peope is far too large - the max should be no more than 6. Also, it should be made slear that historic districts are not subject to the ordinance due to the profound change a coop would make in the historical nature fo the neighborhood.
We already have "Co-Ops" in this neighborhood. They are disguised as rental units that exceed the existing occupancy standards creating parking problems, late night traffic, excessive noise, unkempt landscaping etc. We do not need Co-Ops to make these problems legal.
If the proposed ordinance is accepted, parking will be a major problem since it is likely that each person living in the unit will have a vehicle. This puts unfair parking burden on the neighborhood. I have seen this where I live when 4 unrelated people live in a rented house.
I am not opposed to the concept of coops, just not in the form of the current ordinance. In fact, it is a terrible ordinance for being able to manage coops.