Skip to main content

WE WON!! THE BOARD OFFICIALLY HALTED THE PAVILION PROJECT AND AGREED TO NEW SPENDING TRANSPARENCY RULES!! THANK YOU ALL FOR DEMANDING THAT OUR VOICES MATTER WHEN IT COMES TO OUR MONEY!! STAY VIGILANT BECAUSE WE WILL BE WATCHING THE NEW PLANNING COMMITTEE CLOSELY!!

September 29, 2016

We Don't Need a $150,000+ Pavillion

We Don't Need a $150,000+ Pavillion

🏆 Won — 249 supporters Verified

Final supporters

J
John L.
S
Sandra B.
L
Larry R.
P
Paul S.
S
Someone
A
Alexander T.
J
John R.
R
Robert B.
J
john v.
E
elaine o.
+239 more
CG
Started by Chris Gowdy 10 years, 2 months ago

Dear Brickshire Residents

There are presently plans to construct a pavilion and we are requesting that the Board seek resident input on the proposed construction before signing a contract that would obligate $150,000 or more of funds that have been raised from residents. To the best of my knowledge, this project is not part of any strategic plan that has been presented and accepted by the Brickshire Community. What is the context and justification for it? What other projects will require major funding over the next several years? What is the vision for Brickshire that this structure is part of? Why is it planned to go ahead with construction before a strategic planning committee has been created to develop a long range plan that should include major construction projects?

Going forward, I believe that the Board should adopt a policy that would notify residents and lot owners of any expenditures in excess of $50,000 and provide for an opportunity for a full discussion of the justification for them, unless they are part of the approved budget.

Kindly sign the petition if you are in agreement so we can let the Board know we do not think this is the best use of our HOA funds.

Thank You

Chris Gowdy

Updates

Reached 100 supporters

August 4, 2016

143 Comments

M
Michael Finnegan
10 years ago Featured

Higher end communities do not have Pavillions, but they all have lap pools. Best to look at similar communities like Founders Bridge and the Highlands to see how they add value. I have never seen a higher end community with a Pavillion.

B
Bill Eckroade
10 years ago Featured

Do not like the fact that this project had so much legs without a lot of community communication. Major projects should be at least communicated to all residents! Much better use of funds would be to add a adult only pool. Probably cost less than a new pavilion.

R
Rita Dimmett
10 years ago Featured

Cost is too much and pavilion is not needed. A paved path from Kings Pond Drive connecting to the rest of the path and just upkeep of the trail would better serve the community than a costly structure that would rarely be used.

D
Diane Armstrong
10 years ago Featured

While this might have been discussed at a home owners meeting a while ago it no longer seems to fit the priorities of the neighborhood, especially since the price has nearly doubled from the initial estimates.

J
Julie BRICKER
10 years ago Featured

150,000 for a pavilion that will be used a few times a year is a ridiculous waste of funds. What we actually need is a REAL pool and street lighting in our neighborhoods for added security so it's not pitch black when out walking in the evening

J
John and Erica Holland
10 years ago Featured

All projects that are not part of regular maintenance should be open for approval from lot and home owners. A published agenda for all projects should be required! Including who is working in the projects and if anyone is related to those on the board prior to projects being started.

S
Sandra Brown
9 years ago

We need a larger pool for the children and adults.

C
Curtis Bronder
9 years ago

This project is a complete travesty and waste of money. Completely stupid idea. The board should be ashamed of themselves for tying to slip this past "We The People" of Brickshire. We don't need this and can't afford it. No fee increase is acceptable especially for something as wasteful as this when there are so many other needs that would be better to address.