This is not a good idea . We need our freedom to advertise ourself and market ourself to create a following as a great Realtor
C
Christopher Colmus
9 years ago
This rule is not needed. Signage agreements should be specificly between an agent and their brokers.
B
Brian DeBoer
9 years ago
Self Branding is important!
J
Jeff Kaski
9 years ago
this subject needs to be addressed as an employment requirement between the salesperson and the broker.
J
Jeff Simpson
9 years ago
Featured
These changes were not transparent and handled in the way sweeping changes should be made. These rules are an over correction handled by a few rather then an appropriate response to the changing market conditions for brokers. Please address the needs of all Realtors before making these changes.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Yep
A
AllynMaycumber
9 years ago
This is extremely unfair for the agents who are trying to make a name for themselves in a area
P
Peter Sander
9 years ago
Individual branding is a healthy competitive factor
L
Lisa Costanza
9 years ago
Identifying the brokerage could be accomplished without going to this extreme. This feels like a direct attack on the organizations that believe the agent is the local brand. The agents are the ones that spend their money to promote their brand and should reap the benefits. The companies that pay for national advertising and then sell their own agent leads back to them for a hefty referral fee need to wake up.
B
Brent Gilbert
9 years ago
This legislation would cause hardship for many agent in additional cost and time... I it is unnecessary requirement and five star is already (broker is branded)
D
Dan DeWard
9 years ago
Terrible idea... I would agree to provide equal exposure on all my own paid for marketing materials only if that Broker sent me 1/2 my new business or paid 1/2 my marketing expenses (Win/Win). That is not the broker structure I signed up for as I pay my flat monthly fee (deal or no deal) and am capable of building my own brand and business. Many of us may just need to become our own broker if this passes. Hopefully this bad deal is adjusted..
J
Josh Jacobsma
9 years ago
unbelievable!
B
Becki James Jaeger
9 years ago
This will only add confusion NO THANKS!
B
Bill Stanley
9 years ago
I support agents beinng able to brand themselves
C
Cinda Glor
9 years ago
When they pay for everything a realtor uses them let their name b equal!
D
douglas mekkes
9 years ago
Please reconsider
S
Stephen Martin
9 years ago
Please reconsider
B
Barbara Fisher
9 years ago
I urge you to reconsider. Realtors are encouraged to brand our business while always having the brokerage name as well. If both are the same size it will initiate significant consternation and confusion for realtors, brokerages, bankers, loan officers, inspectors, appraisers et al. Thanks in advance for your reconsideration.
This is not a good idea . We need our freedom to advertise ourself and market ourself to create a following as a great Realtor
This rule is not needed. Signage agreements should be specificly between an agent and their brokers.
Self Branding is important!
this subject needs to be addressed as an employment requirement between the salesperson and the broker.
These changes were not transparent and handled in the way sweeping changes should be made. These rules are an over correction handled by a few rather then an appropriate response to the changing market conditions for brokers. Please address the needs of all Realtors before making these changes.
Yep
This is extremely unfair for the agents who are trying to make a name for themselves in a area
Individual branding is a healthy competitive factor
Identifying the brokerage could be accomplished without going to this extreme. This feels like a direct attack on the organizations that believe the agent is the local brand. The agents are the ones that spend their money to promote their brand and should reap the benefits. The companies that pay for national advertising and then sell their own agent leads back to them for a hefty referral fee need to wake up.
This legislation would cause hardship for many agent in additional cost and time... I it is unnecessary requirement and five star is already (broker is branded)
Terrible idea... I would agree to provide equal exposure on all my own paid for marketing materials only if that Broker sent me 1/2 my new business or paid 1/2 my marketing expenses (Win/Win). That is not the broker structure I signed up for as I pay my flat monthly fee (deal or no deal) and am capable of building my own brand and business. Many of us may just need to become our own broker if this passes. Hopefully this bad deal is adjusted..
unbelievable!
This will only add confusion NO THANKS!
I support agents beinng able to brand themselves
When they pay for everything a realtor uses them let their name b equal!
Please reconsider
Please reconsider
I urge you to reconsider. Realtors are encouraged to brand our business while always having the brokerage name as well. If both are the same size it will initiate significant consternation and confusion for realtors, brokerages, bankers, loan officers, inspectors, appraisers et al. Thanks in advance for your reconsideration.
Please do reconsider!
Thank you!