Skip to main content

The Secretary of State has issued updated guidance to align precinct procedures with the statutes cited in our petition. We have achieved the necessary correction of these election protocols. I will continue to monitor the implementation of these new directives across all counties to ensure full compliance.

December 18, 2016

Minnesota Election Judge Petition

Minnesota Election Judge Petition

🏆 Won — 325 supporters Verified

Final supporters

S
sharon c.
K
Kenneth I.
S
Someone
R
ROSALIE M.
L
Larry S.
S
Someone
J
Janice H.
C
Chris J.
M
Marie P.
J
Joshua M.
+315 more
AC
Started by Andy Cilek 9 years, 10 months ago

I am an election judge for the November 8, 2016 election.

I have a duty to apply the law of Minnesota which prohibits ineligible people from voting.

Minnesota’s election officials wrongly instruct election judges to allow certain classes of persons, determined before the elections to be ineligible, to rebut their status and to self-certify they are eligible to vote. These individuals classified on the precinct rosters as “challenged – felon”, challenged – guardianship” and “challenged – citizenship” are not permitted by Minnesota law to alter their eligibility to vote. The status of these voters is, by statute, not subject to revision at the election judge level. MN Statute 201.155/157, 201.15, and 201.158 specifically task the county auditor to change the voter status.

Minnesota election judges are directed to act illegally when they follow the Minnesota Secretary of State 2016 Election Judge Guide and allow these ineligible felons, wards and non-citizens to vote after self-certifying their eligibility.

Minnesota election officials act illegally when they interpret Minnesota Statute section 204C.12 – which is limited to challenges to when a judge has personal knowledge or reasonably believes a voter may be ineligible. It does not apply to voters whose status (as felon, ward or non-citizen) has already been determined.

Therefore, I join in this petition calling for all election judges in Minnesota to refuse to follow the Minnesota Secretary of State 2016 Election Judge Guide requiring election judges to provide ballots to ineligible persons marked “challenged – felony”, “challenged – guardianship” and “challenged – citizenship”, even if they wish to self-certify as to their eligibility. To do so would be to allow an ineligible person to illegally vote at the November 8, 2016 election and would violate my election judge oath.

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

November 2, 2016

October 31, 2016

The petition reached 100 signatures. I am now preparing a formal letter to the Secretary of State citing the specific statutes mentioned in this petition to demand a review of the current Election Judge Guide.

Reached 100 supporters

October 30, 2016

6 Comments

S
Sarah Wade
9 years ago Featured

This is ridiculous. My tax dollars go to these elections and it needs to be run honestly. Stop letting felons vote when the statute says no.

G
Gary Parker
9 years ago Featured

The law is the law. Why are we letting them bypass the rules that are clearly written for everyone else to follow?

T
Tom Castro
9 years ago Featured

THANK YOU for standing up for the rule of law. We need REAL integrity in our precincts.

M
Mike Brooks
9 years ago Featured

If they are flagged on the list they shouldn't be voting. Simple as that. Stop making it so easy to skirt the system.

L
Linda Duncan
9 years ago Featured

Finally someone is speaking up about this. Its complete insanity that the state wants us to ignore the roster status. Do your job MN!

B
Brenda Sharma
9 years ago Featured

Too much confusion at the polls already. Stick to the statutes and stop changing the rules at the last minute.