Skip to main content

'Me too!' letter to deny Dixon Ranch

368 Comments

S
Suzanne Bradley
9 years ago

Who is going to pay for the roads, schools, parks, etc. Oviously no room for those things for families and neighbors. A new high school will be needed and Usually rocky hillsides are what are made available for PURCHASE. Prime examples are Marina and Rolling Hills Middle Schools. The districts had to spend a small fortune to level out hillsides to make playing fields. Developers do NOT care about the quality of life for the families. It is ALL about $$$

T
Tim Brown
9 years ago

I just moved into the area from the suburbs of Southern California. There is no need to continually expand urban sprawl! The developers of this land will most assuredly not live here. They will merely take their profits and return to the gated community that they already I've in, or buy a vacation home on a few secluded acres somewhere else.

S
Shelly Brown
9 years ago

There are enough housing elsewhere. No need to develop any more land. The impact on the roads, schools, and community would HUGE. I vote NO.

S
Stephanie Honda
9 years ago

I moved to RURAL country, for just that!!! Don't turn our RURAL into your profit!!!

J
Jim Jeffers
9 years ago

This densely populated plan does not in any way fit the surrounding homes and properties in the area. Reducing the lot number by 50% would still be over developing the plot. The developer does not adequately address the issues of short or long term water supply, drainage, increased utility burden, improved and additional access to the area to manage the huge increase in traffic flow, or have a realistic plan for funding for ongoing property and road maintenance, or emergency services. This plan is poorly designed and unrealistic for the proposed location. It's a definite NO.

T
Todd Pieplow
9 years ago

Vote no on Dixon Ranch

K
Kelly Cowger
9 years ago Featured

The area is already negatively impacted by excess traffic. Also, remember the drought? It is discouraging to think our representatives are willing to sell out the existing communities for the personal $ gain of a few. Ethics...conflict of interest?

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

I live close by and there's no way I support that development Greenvalley Road is bad enough already

M
Michelle Miller
9 years ago

Please don't build these houses.

S
Sean and Rebecca Neilon
9 years ago

I can't believe this proposal has gotten this far. There goes what was left of our small town charm. Also, I have never seen a case where the extra burden on roads, schools, services, safety, etc. is ever mitigated by the permit fees/ incoming tax base. In other words: the higher density the housing, the worse the area. Please vote this down. Thank you.

S
Sharon Evans
9 years ago

We don't want our rural area to be overcrowded with way too many on the amount of housing that should be in that acreage! It will impact our roads and our environment to do this development!. Please say No to the Dixon Ranch project!

B
Brittany Ogden
9 years ago

I want to help to stop this! We need to keep our beautiful land! No more houses!

D
Daniel Gerard
9 years ago

This does not benefit our community, it only stands to benefit the developer. Don't ignore the masses to appease a few.

T
Thomas Martin
9 years ago

No Dixon Ranch!

N
Nancy Jonas
9 years ago

THIS IS A HORRIBLE PLAN AND WE DO NOT WANT IT!!!!!!!!

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Keep our towns small

J
James Emick
9 years ago

I moved here in1 1978 to get out of the city ,don't let the city follow me.

K
Katie Holt
9 years ago

Nooooo

R
Robert Fero
9 years ago

Ridiculously high density. It will ruin our rural environment. Impact on traffic will be severe.

S
Sylvia
9 years ago

The traffic will be ridiculous!