Skip to main content

MAKE DUPE NAT 5'S TRADEABLE

197 Comments

J
Jorden Goodhue
8 years ago

include nat4s and ld monsters. also a seal break pack that is a limited rotation much like the reappraisal stones.

R
RezaDwiPratama
8 years ago

maybe the "seal break" is farmable from giant/dragon/necro 1-10. so newbie can trade too xD

A
Armand Francois
8 years ago

Great Idea for new and long time players. Getting duplicate Nat 5 monsters as a newer player is discouraging and not uncommon. It is a bad feeling having such a rare summon be wasted. A fair trading system would benefit everyone, those long time players getting the last few monsters they don't have, or those new players getting rid of the duplicate for something that can help them progress!

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

That a real good way to make the game better and evade the boreing/sad part of getting duplicated monsters. (im not a late game play but i think your idea is just perfect

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Definitely should do this as well as a number of very small tweaks that they continue to forget about like hiding crit animations option, allowing essence deconstruct (eg: 1 high = 5 mid), etc.

D
Dj
8 years ago

this is an awesome idea that will make me want to spend more. i have 40+ nat 5s and about 12 are dupes

D
dimas
8 years ago

YES PLEASE

R
RiotApe
8 years ago

Dupe nat5s are useless

J
Joshua Butnariu
8 years ago

Pl com2us the game is one that we have spent lot of money and time we have been loyal to you and hope that you will respect our loyalty back.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Please make this happen!

J
Jamerso Lima
8 years ago

Pls

S
seb
8 years ago

yes!!!

M
Marty
8 years ago

Would be dope

T
Toxri
8 years ago

yes pls

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

I have been loving this game but I dont have many nats 5s in the first place and i already have two dupes

R
Rolo trolo
8 years ago

This would be awes0me!

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

True

M
Mitchell Baird
8 years ago

YESSSSSSSSSS PLEASE!

D
Dhesal
8 years ago

make monsters tradable this game is too stingy!!

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

I am completely for this! only with the parameters you chose, as those seem very fair.