Following the Macro III paper on Thursday, the majority of feedback in regards to the structure and content of the paper, has been extremely negative.
Much of the feedback has consisted of complaints regarding:
- The question structure of 1 and 2 .
- Question 4 part a) on the productivity shift (Shapiro-Stiglitz Model)
- Question 4 part b) on the Kiyotaki-Moore model
Having spoken to a number of people on the course the general consensus is strong enough to create this petition. The aim of the petition is to emphasise the unfair nature of the paper, in regards to the lecture materials we've been given throughout the year compared to the questions themselves- we can all agree that one poor mark can have serious impacts on our degrees so if you agree that there should be some sort of mark adjustment for the paper then please sign this petition.
That exam was absolute carnage. None of the practice papers looked anything like those questions.