This board is out of control with spending everyone's money on a few that might benefit. I am also dealing with potential favoritism by the board for a board member regarding hard landscape property line encroachment. If there is no crime, then why spend the dime?
S
Susan Nikirk
4 years ago
Featured
Instead of spending the money on the street lights which I agree we do not need, hire an arborist to trim the trees on Bay Hill Drive, which is much needed. Only a real arborist knows how to trim trees. Much needed!
A
Alisa Zecker
4 years ago
As a resident here in the community since the end of 1996, i am opposed to the additional lighting, and the impact it poses from several standpoints.
E
Elliot isban
4 years ago
I Say no to proposed lighting plan.
for the following reasons.
Some of considerations were not given to:
1 Light pollution
2 Dark compliant fixtures
3 light trespass
4 Scotopic effect
5 DLC approved.
6 Photometric spacing
A good example of what not to do is the entrance lighting at the gate.
These fixtures were apparently retrofitted with LED "Corn Cob" units which, I suppose were to save energy . This is a terrible choice it creates an ugly "Glare Bomb" at the first impression of BHE and is down right dangerous as they are right in the line of sight of the drive lane, and is the most energy efficient choice.
FPLs program to lease the lighting proposed is designed for them to sell off peak power and does not address the considerations above and certainly not in our best interests.
To add to my frustration. I volunteered my 40 years of professional lighting experience to the board and committee heads at least 3 times and never even got a response once.
M
Mary Stennett
4 years ago
The lights in Bay Hills are dawn to dusk now and so will the new ones.
M
Mary Stennett
4 years ago
I tried to vote yes but your survey only allows no votes which does not appear to be a very honest petition. Please remove my No vote if you cannot change it to Yes and have an honest and fair petition.
M
Mike Mikheal
4 years ago
Do not see need when so few have requested. Great selection of Dusk to Dawn Solar lights available on ebay for individuals wanting extra light for their yards, easy to install.
B
Beverly Koffler
4 years ago
NO to the proposed lights
M
Mary Stennett
4 years ago
Would you be surprised to learn that FPL did the neighborhood survey and made the recommendations to the board for the number and location of additional streetlights? Did you check to see if the board has already allocated this money in their POA budget? The 24-hour lights only operate between dusk and dawn. For more specifications, please see https://infpl.fpl.com/partner/pdf/led-catalog.pdf
M
Mary Stennett
4 years ago
Did someone check to see if the Board already has this expense in their approved budget for the year? Has the money already been allocated? Would it surprise you to know that Florida Power & Light did the neighborhood survey and provided this information on the number of lights needed to the board? If you are unaware of these facts, then maybe you should reconsider your vote.
G
Guy E Hennecy
4 years ago
I don't think we need more street lights.
L
Laurence Lougheed
4 years ago
No to additional street lights.
M
Michael Prather
4 years ago
Featured
Need more info. This potential light pollution will interfere with my planned landscape lighting installation for 2022 thus diminishing our investment/potential added property value and curb appeal at night.
M
Ming Huang
4 years ago
No additional lights unless deemed necessary by PBG Police Department.
J
J David Goldin
4 years ago
I'm against lights because of the costs. Enviromental, Health and Welfare arguments are specious in a residential neighborhood. Property destruction (if any) would be repaired by FL &P.
K
Kimberly Pacy
4 years ago
No to additional street lights.
J
Joe Haber
4 years ago
No to the street lights
K
Kerry Delaney
4 years ago
No Lights
B
Bob Norris
4 years ago
No
G
Gio Muirragui
4 years ago
No street lamps, the ones that are already installed are not been maintained.
This board is out of control with spending everyone's money on a few that might benefit. I am also dealing with potential favoritism by the board for a board member regarding hard landscape property line encroachment. If there is no crime, then why spend the dime?
Instead of spending the money on the street lights which I agree we do not need, hire an arborist to trim the trees on Bay Hill Drive, which is much needed. Only a real arborist knows how to trim trees. Much needed!
As a resident here in the community since the end of 1996, i am opposed to the additional lighting, and the impact it poses from several standpoints.
I Say no to proposed lighting plan. for the following reasons. Some of considerations were not given to: 1 Light pollution 2 Dark compliant fixtures 3 light trespass 4 Scotopic effect 5 DLC approved. 6 Photometric spacing A good example of what not to do is the entrance lighting at the gate. These fixtures were apparently retrofitted with LED "Corn Cob" units which, I suppose were to save energy . This is a terrible choice it creates an ugly "Glare Bomb" at the first impression of BHE and is down right dangerous as they are right in the line of sight of the drive lane, and is the most energy efficient choice. FPLs program to lease the lighting proposed is designed for them to sell off peak power and does not address the considerations above and certainly not in our best interests. To add to my frustration. I volunteered my 40 years of professional lighting experience to the board and committee heads at least 3 times and never even got a response once.
The lights in Bay Hills are dawn to dusk now and so will the new ones.
I tried to vote yes but your survey only allows no votes which does not appear to be a very honest petition. Please remove my No vote if you cannot change it to Yes and have an honest and fair petition.
Do not see need when so few have requested. Great selection of Dusk to Dawn Solar lights available on ebay for individuals wanting extra light for their yards, easy to install.
NO to the proposed lights
Would you be surprised to learn that FPL did the neighborhood survey and made the recommendations to the board for the number and location of additional streetlights? Did you check to see if the board has already allocated this money in their POA budget? The 24-hour lights only operate between dusk and dawn. For more specifications, please see https://infpl.fpl.com/partner/pdf/led-catalog.pdf
Did someone check to see if the Board already has this expense in their approved budget for the year? Has the money already been allocated? Would it surprise you to know that Florida Power & Light did the neighborhood survey and provided this information on the number of lights needed to the board? If you are unaware of these facts, then maybe you should reconsider your vote.
I don't think we need more street lights.
No to additional street lights.
Need more info. This potential light pollution will interfere with my planned landscape lighting installation for 2022 thus diminishing our investment/potential added property value and curb appeal at night.
No additional lights unless deemed necessary by PBG Police Department.
I'm against lights because of the costs. Enviromental, Health and Welfare arguments are specious in a residential neighborhood. Property destruction (if any) would be repaired by FL &P.
No to additional street lights.
No to the street lights
No Lights
No
No street lamps, the ones that are already installed are not been maintained.