i agree : While he can be sometimes too personal in his comments, his humour, and tongue in cheek comments very often triggers people to consider the underlying assumptions/intentions of statements and questions.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Featured
While he can be sometimes too personal in his comments, his humour, and tongue in cheek comments very often triggers people to consider the underlying assumptions/intentions of statements and questions.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Let him in
J
JN
3 years ago
Let's be more inclusive ;)
A
Ah fa
3 years ago
Let huatist back to 1m65
D
DT
3 years ago
At least he dare to voice out the areas most of us are holding back.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
there is a fair bit of legitimacy in what he say just not nice to hear
H
Hava
3 years ago
We want him back
S
Siew Leng
3 years ago
Huatist posts messages, contributes more than than silent readers
J
Josh Kang
3 years ago
Huatist is good for the group.
N
Nate
3 years ago
impt to demonstrate inclusivity, embrace diversity, accept differences
H
Houjicha
3 years ago
Featured
I believe that we should not ban Singaporeans who can contribute positively to the chat and make it more engaging. As mature adults, we should only ban them if their presence poses a risk to the welfare of the chat group aka scammer that will scam our people money away.
O
Oldman
3 years ago
Let him in, he a gd contributor without him there no latest news.
i agree : While he can be sometimes too personal in his comments, his humour, and tongue in cheek comments very often triggers people to consider the underlying assumptions/intentions of statements and questions.
While he can be sometimes too personal in his comments, his humour, and tongue in cheek comments very often triggers people to consider the underlying assumptions/intentions of statements and questions.
Let him in
Let's be more inclusive ;)
Let huatist back to 1m65
At least he dare to voice out the areas most of us are holding back.
there is a fair bit of legitimacy in what he say just not nice to hear
We want him back
Huatist posts messages, contributes more than than silent readers
Huatist is good for the group.
impt to demonstrate inclusivity, embrace diversity, accept differences
I believe that we should not ban Singaporeans who can contribute positively to the chat and make it more engaging. As mature adults, we should only ban them if their presence poses a risk to the welfare of the chat group aka scammer that will scam our people money away.
Let him in, he a gd contributor without him there no latest news.