Let Lake Pend Oreille School District Know: The Law Matters!
49 Comments
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
My vote would be no if the correct wording and amount was revealed and included in the original language. The board is not serving the community in allowing this to continue with taxpayer funds.
J
Jon Alarcon
6 years ago
fire the superintendant, talk about over payed for menial work from a bully.
A
Anita Aurit
6 years ago
Featured
The behavior of LPOSD who has admitted they were in violation of the law but continue to refuse to do the right thing is a terrible example to our children and a slap in the face of property tax payers.
B
Barb Mercier
6 years ago
Re vote
C
Christian Watts
6 years ago
School district officials need to back off or be replaced!!!!!
M
Mary DeHaan
6 years ago
The law matters. Follow it
M
Marrion Newsam Banks
6 years ago
Featured
The school district should be required to follow the law. If they're so certain that the levy has the support of the voters, they shouldn't be afraid of re-running the levy vote with all of the required information provided to the voters.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Featured
I would never had voted in favor of this Levy had it not omitted the increase of $214 per $100,000 of property assessed value!
T
Tonja Lynch
6 years ago
NO is my vote
M
Michael J Andrade
6 years ago
Just like all politics. Lies, lies and more lies.
A
Annie
6 years ago
I voted NO, I would vote NO again!!
J
Jim Wallace
6 years ago
Obey the law!! Don't do business behind closed doors! This is not California
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
This is Your government.
S
Summer Cantrall
6 years ago
This is against the law!
D
Dedre Ahl
6 years ago
The last levy was a travesty. Voters had a right to know tax implications of their votes. This smacks of Calif-style tricks.
K
Kevin Burkamp
6 years ago
Follow the law!
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
Featured
These school levies shouldn't be (just) the burden of property owners. A county-wide sales tax should be applied instead. That being said, the levy should be null and void.
B
Bob Pekarek
6 years ago
LPOSD has a history of lies and omissions - the levy should be voided.
J
Jim l MCREYNOLDS
6 years ago
The omission was a violation of Idaho law and the results should be voided. Failure to void this just let's them know they can do it again.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
If the law was not followed, the Levy needs too be voided and put to a vote again.
My vote would be no if the correct wording and amount was revealed and included in the original language. The board is not serving the community in allowing this to continue with taxpayer funds.
fire the superintendant, talk about over payed for menial work from a bully.
The behavior of LPOSD who has admitted they were in violation of the law but continue to refuse to do the right thing is a terrible example to our children and a slap in the face of property tax payers.
Re vote
School district officials need to back off or be replaced!!!!!
The law matters. Follow it
The school district should be required to follow the law. If they're so certain that the levy has the support of the voters, they shouldn't be afraid of re-running the levy vote with all of the required information provided to the voters.
I would never had voted in favor of this Levy had it not omitted the increase of $214 per $100,000 of property assessed value!
NO is my vote
Just like all politics. Lies, lies and more lies.
I voted NO, I would vote NO again!!
Obey the law!! Don't do business behind closed doors! This is not California
This is Your government.
This is against the law!
The last levy was a travesty. Voters had a right to know tax implications of their votes. This smacks of Calif-style tricks.
Follow the law!
These school levies shouldn't be (just) the burden of property owners. A county-wide sales tax should be applied instead. That being said, the levy should be null and void.
LPOSD has a history of lies and omissions - the levy should be voided.
The omission was a violation of Idaho law and the results should be voided. Failure to void this just let's them know they can do it again.
If the law was not followed, the Levy needs too be voided and put to a vote again.