We, the undersigned members of the Australian Jewish community, oppose the following proposal made in their submission to the Food Labelling Review by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) and the Organisation of Rabbis Australasia (ORA).
The ECAJ/ORA submission proposes that ORA be responsible for deciding which foods can be labelled ‘kosher.’ We are strongly opposed to this proposal for the following reasons:
The proposal is anti-competitive The three primary office bearers of ORA have financial interests in the kosher food business, and therefore ORA cannot act independently in this realm. The President of ORA is the rabbi in charge of KAWA, the primary organisation providing kosher certification in Western Australia. The Immediate Past President of ORA is the rabbi in charge of Kosher Australia, the primary organisation providing kosher certification in Victoria. The Senior Vice President is the rabbi in charge of the NSW KA, the primary organisation providing kosher certification in New South Wales. Kosher certification is a business, so proposing that ORA oversee kosher labelling is equivalent to putting the three largest companies in a sector in charge of licensing for that sector.
There is no reason to regulate kosher food labelling Primarily, food labelling law supports policy objectives of public health and safety, and enabling consumers to make informed choices. Kosher labelling is not related to public health or safety and as detailed in the ECAJ/ORA submission (see points 12-14), the current system of self-regulation suffices to enable consumers to make informed choices about kosher food. Therefore, we cannot see any reason for introducing standards around kosher labelling in Australia.
The regulation of kosher labelling is outside the scope of Australian law Defining private religious practice is outside of the scope of Australian law.
The proposal limits Jewish religious freedom in Australia
ORA does not represent the plurality of Jewish religious groups in Australia. It consists exclusively of Orthodox rabbis, and even within Orthodoxy, the majority of committee members are from one Orthodox sub-denomination. To put it simply, different denominations within Judaism maintain different interpretations of ‘kosher’. We are concerned that ORA could use their position to limit the ability of Jewish denominations not represented by ORA to maintain their own kosher labelling.
I have been reading through all the emails coming in and honestly the conflict of interest here is just so much more blatant than I even realized at the start. It is exhausting trying to track all these overlapping board roles but I am getting somewhere with my notes because people keep sending me more examples of how this monopoly would actually hurt local families.
May 26, 2010
I really thought this might just be a small thing I wrote in a frustration haze but seeing this kind of movement is honestly spinning my head a little bit. It is wild to realize how many of you feel the same way about the obvious conflict of interest here because it is just not right for the market to be tied up this way.
6 Comments
B
Ben Perry
16 years ago
Featured
Bad idea for the community. Monopolies are never good for the consumer. Stop this now.
M
Mark Conway
16 years ago
Featured
NO! We dont need these guys running everything. Keep it competitive.
S
Sarah Perry
16 years ago
Featured
This is nothing but a money grab. We need competition not a total monopoly on our food.
R
Rachel Jimenez
16 years ago
Featured
Ridiculous. Kosher prices are already way too high and this will just make it worse for everyone.
D
David Yang
16 years ago
Featured
Total conflict of interest here. How is this even being considered? Keep it fair and open.
L
Leah Sanders
16 years ago
Featured
They are just looking out for their own wallets. Keep the certification market open.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Instagram
QR Code
Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
We, the undersigned members of the Australian Jewish community, oppose the following proposal made in their submission to the Food Labelling Review by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) and the Organisation of Rabbis Australasia (ORA).
The ECAJ/ORA submission proposes that ORA be responsible for deciding which foods can be labelled ‘kosher.’ We are strongly opposed to this proposal for the following reasons:
The proposal is anti-competitive The three primary office bearers of ORA have financial interests in the kosher food business, and therefore ORA cannot act independently in this realm. The President of ORA is the rabbi in charge of KAWA, the primary organisation providing kosher certification in Western Australia. The Immediate Past President of ORA is the rabbi in charge of Kosher Australia, the primary organisation providing kosher certification in Victoria. The Senior Vice President is the rabbi in charge of the NSW KA, the primary organisation providing kosher certification in New South Wales. Kosher certification is a business, so proposing that ORA oversee kosher labelling is equivalent to putting the three largest companies in a sector in charge of licensing for that sector.
There is no reason to regulate kosher food labelling Primarily, food labelling law supports policy objectives of public health and safety, and enabling consumers to make informed choices. Kosher labelling is not related to public health or safety and as detailed in the ECAJ/ORA submission (see points 12-14), the current system of self-regulation suffices to enable consumers to make informed choices about kosher food. Therefore, we cannot see any reason for introducing standards around kosher labelling in Australia.
The regulation of kosher labelling is outside the scope of Australian law Defining private religious practice is outside of the scope of Australian law.
The proposal limits Jewish religious freedom in Australia
ORA does not represent the plurality of Jewish religious groups in Australia. It consists exclusively of Orthodox rabbis, and even within Orthodoxy, the majority of committee members are from one Orthodox sub-denomination. To put it simply, different denominations within Judaism maintain different interpretations of ‘kosher’. We are concerned that ORA could use their position to limit the ability of Jewish denominations not represented by ORA to maintain their own kosher labelling.
I have been reading through all the emails coming in and honestly the conflict of interest here is just so much more blatant than I even realized at the start. It is exhausting trying to track all these overlapping board roles but I am getting somewhere with my notes because people keep sending me more examples of how this monopoly would actually hurt local families.
May 26, 2010
I really thought this might just be a small thing I wrote in a frustration haze but seeing this kind of movement is honestly spinning my head a little bit. It is wild to realize how many of you feel the same way about the obvious conflict of interest here because it is just not right for the market to be tied up this way.
6 Comments
B
Ben Perry
16 years ago
Featured
Bad idea for the community. Monopolies are never good for the consumer. Stop this now.
M
Mark Conway
16 years ago
Featured
NO! We dont need these guys running everything. Keep it competitive.
S
Sarah Perry
16 years ago
Featured
This is nothing but a money grab. We need competition not a total monopoly on our food.
R
Rachel Jimenez
16 years ago
Featured
Ridiculous. Kosher prices are already way too high and this will just make it worse for everyone.
D
David Yang
16 years ago
Featured
Total conflict of interest here. How is this even being considered? Keep it fair and open.
L
Leah Sanders
16 years ago
Featured
They are just looking out for their own wallets. Keep the certification market open.
Bad idea for the community. Monopolies are never good for the consumer. Stop this now.