Skip to main content

Keep Californians Safe From 1632 Tons of Radioactive Waste

102 Comments

K
Kurt Wyman
10 years ago

I'm with you! Go Get'em.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

San Onofre is not an appropriate long term storage solution.

J
Judy Teverbaugh
11 years ago

It is unthinkable that this toxic spent fuel remain in a densely populated and vulnerable location!

L
Les G. Miklosy PE
11 years ago

"Bury and Forget" is not a nuclear waste reprocessing strategy.

M
Mary Franz
11 years ago

please remember that "In every deliberation we must consider the next seven generations."

D
Dr Sue Savary
11 years ago

This waste must be removed from dense population areas.

J
James Rushing
11 years ago

The DOE should be abolished and let the free market correct this big mistake brought on by well meaning government trying to do good by force.

L
Linda Rushing
11 years ago

This is what socialism looks like, a rogue business exempt from liability by a corrupt system.

P
Penelope King
11 years ago

Please --- NO radioactive nuclear waste storage at San Onofre or near such vulnerable, highly populated areas

F
Frances Chilcote
11 years ago

keep us safe!

C
11 years ago

It is ridiculous to store this waste to such a populated area. Get creative! This will just continue to be a problem in the future!

T
Theodore Medbury
11 years ago

Nothing more to say......

C
Chuck Bertolino
11 years ago

No nuclear waste storage in Socal.

I
Irmi Ryan
11 years ago

Please keep Americans safe!

L
Les G. Miklosy PE
11 years ago Featured

The economic benefit or cost of nuclear power depends upon how one measures cost. The externalized cost is the remediation of nuclear waste paid for by unborn generations.

J
Jeanette Rollinger
11 years ago

Allowing the nuclear waste to remain in so unsafe an area as the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station is unthinkable.

W
william
11 years ago

hi

B
Brenda
11 years ago

Protested when they built the thing.