PASTEURSED MILK SUUPPORTS CANCER AND BIG PHARMA, PASTEURISED MILK IS ONLY GOOD FOR BABY COWS
R
Ron Bolton
11 years ago
As a public health inspector/ environmental health officer, I had been taught that heat-treated milk was safer to drink than raw milk. (Heat-treated milk includes pasteurized, sterilised and ultra heat treated.) But I noticed that outbreaks connected to milk or cheese were virtually all in heat-treated milk, not raw milk. After I retired, I researched this. I am now absolutely sure that raw milk has been unfairly blamed. The reason given for heat-treating milk is to kill harmful bacteria such as TB. But heat-treated milk can become contaminated with bacteria such as TB. Raw milk naturally contains bacteria such as lactobacillus, which actually prevent pathogenic bacteria taking hold. So raw is safer than heat-treated. Also, heat-treatment destroys essential enzymes. When you drink pasteurized milk, the body thinks it is under attack. It cannot digest the milk, so you do not get the many benefits of milk.
Drinking raw milk is incredibly good for your health. You get many things. Eenzymes, which help to break down the milk. Elements such as calcium. Many bacteria that are essential for health. (75% of the body’s immune system is bacteria in the gut. Healthy gut bacteria are one of the most important factors in health).
The reason raw milk is demonized is not scientific, but political. Why would the government encourage us to drink milk that is harmful, and discourage us from drinking raw milk which will make us healthy? One answer is to look at milk in the UK. Nearly all is bought by big concerns at low prices, and is low quality. Milk that is to be sold raw, especially organic, is more expensive to produce, comes from smaller farms and is sold direct to the consumer.
The more that people become aware of the benefits of raw milk, the more the demand for raw, and the lower the demand for heat-treated and the lower the profits of the large dairy concerns.
So the government has to choose. Either what is good for people. Or what is pro
R
Ron Bolton
11 years ago
As a public health inspector/ environmental health officer, I had been taught that heat-treated milk was safer to drink than raw milk. (Heat-treated milk includes pasteurized, sterilised and ultra heat treated.) But I noticed that outbreaks connected to milk or cheese were virtually all in heat-treated milk, not raw milk. After I retired, I researched this. I am now absolutely sure that raw milk has been unfairly blamed. The reason given for heat-treating milk is to kill harmful bacteria such as TB. But heat-treated milk can become contaminated with bacteria such as TB. Raw milk naturally contains bacteria such as lactobacillus, which actually prevent pathogenic bacteria taking hold. So raw is safer than heat-treated. Also, heat-treatment destroys essential enzymes. When you drink pasteurized milk, the body thinks it is under attack. It cannot digest the milk, so you do not get the many benefits of milk.
Drinking raw milk is incredibly good for your health. You get many things. Eenzymes, which help to break down the milk. Elements such as calcium. Many bacteria that are essential for health. (75% of the body’s immune system is bacteria in the gut. Healthy gut bacteria are one of the most important factors in health).
The reason raw milk is demonized is not scientific, but political. Why would the government encourage us to drink milk that is harmful, and discourage us from drinking raw milk which will make us healthy? One answer is to look at milk in the UK. Nearly all is bought by big concerns at low prices, and is low quality. Milk that is to be sold raw, especially organic, is more expensive to produce, comes from smaller farms and is sold direct to the consumer.
The more that people become aware of the benefits of raw milk, the more the demand for raw, and the lower the demand for heat-treated and the lower the profits of the large dairy concerns.
So the government has to choose. Either what is good for people. Or what is pro
C
Christiane Heiligers
11 years ago
Please allow raw milk to stay available to the public
C
Christiane Heiligers
11 years ago
Please allow raw milk to stay available to the public
J
Jenny Glover
11 years ago
I believe we should be allowed to choose. I strongly believe that we should be able to choose to have foods that have not been 'messed about with'. I can understand the risks - and benefits - and I choose green top; I also believe it is the healthy option.
J
Jenny Glover
11 years ago
I believe we should be allowed to choose. I strongly believe that we should be able to choose to have foods that have not been 'messed about with'. I can understand the risks - and benefits - and I choose green top; I also believe it is the healthy option.
B
Brenda clack
11 years ago
We must stop interfering with our food sources. In my opinion Natural Is Best.
B
Brenda clack
11 years ago
We must stop interfering with our food sources. In my opinion Natural Is Best.
R
rachid
11 years ago
l was breast fed , later, we had only raw milk . l have had raw warm milk straight out of the com as a teen ,although never brought up on a farm, but in the Med. for these reasons alone l will be signing this as proof that raw butter ,milk, never harmed me or all the family . l live in uk , the western diet made me very ill , l regret to adhere to it , but last few years , organic always , but we need , food as close to nature intended as poss, as it is ,we are killing future generations. my grand ma ,lived to be 105 when she passed ,she was a herbal injury healer passed from genererations , all my siblings born at home ,no nurse , no doctor no pills ,nothing ,all my grand mothers deliveries ,she has never been to any medical school , 10 of us are healthy today at a ripe age ,god bless nature .
R
rachid
11 years ago
l was breast fed , later, we had only raw milk . l have had raw warm milk straight out of the com as a teen ,although never brought up on a farm, but in the Med. for these reasons alone l will be signing this as proof that raw butter ,milk, never harmed me or all the family . l live in uk , the western diet made me very ill , l regret to adhere to it , but last few years , organic always , but we need , food as close to nature intended as poss, as it is ,we are killing future generations. my grand ma ,lived to be 105 when she passed ,she was a herbal injury healer passed from genererations , all my siblings born at home ,no nurse , no doctor no pills ,nothing ,all my grand mothers deliveries ,she has never been to any medical school , 10 of us are healthy today at a ripe age ,god bless nature .
J
john wantling
11 years ago
I like raw milk very much. Far superior than processed milk. That is awful milk.
J
john wantling
11 years ago
I like raw milk very much. Far superior than processed milk. That is awful milk.
H
harbinder Bhogal
11 years ago
we need natural milk not unhealthy pasteurised milk that provides us no nourishment at all but encourages ill health!!
H
harbinder Bhogal
11 years ago
we need natural milk not unhealthy pasteurised milk that provides us no nourishment at all but encourages ill health!!
L
Lynette Wells
11 years ago
I fully support this campaign
L
Lynette Wells
11 years ago
I fully support this campaign
T
Tom Merrick
11 years ago
It's not pasteurisation that makes milk "safe". It is done through proper care and treatment of the cows. I don't want fake milk, I just want milk.
T
Tom Merrick
11 years ago
It's not pasteurisation that makes milk "safe". It is done through proper care and treatment of the cows. I don't want fake milk, I just want milk.
A
Anna Stuart
11 years ago
Considering there is such unbelievable amount of unhealthy people in the UK wouldn't it be sensible to look into raw milk that offer beneficial bacteria to improve our general health?
PASTEURSED MILK SUUPPORTS CANCER AND BIG PHARMA, PASTEURISED MILK IS ONLY GOOD FOR BABY COWS
As a public health inspector/ environmental health officer, I had been taught that heat-treated milk was safer to drink than raw milk. (Heat-treated milk includes pasteurized, sterilised and ultra heat treated.) But I noticed that outbreaks connected to milk or cheese were virtually all in heat-treated milk, not raw milk. After I retired, I researched this. I am now absolutely sure that raw milk has been unfairly blamed. The reason given for heat-treating milk is to kill harmful bacteria such as TB. But heat-treated milk can become contaminated with bacteria such as TB. Raw milk naturally contains bacteria such as lactobacillus, which actually prevent pathogenic bacteria taking hold. So raw is safer than heat-treated. Also, heat-treatment destroys essential enzymes. When you drink pasteurized milk, the body thinks it is under attack. It cannot digest the milk, so you do not get the many benefits of milk. Drinking raw milk is incredibly good for your health. You get many things. Eenzymes, which help to break down the milk. Elements such as calcium. Many bacteria that are essential for health. (75% of the body’s immune system is bacteria in the gut. Healthy gut bacteria are one of the most important factors in health). The reason raw milk is demonized is not scientific, but political. Why would the government encourage us to drink milk that is harmful, and discourage us from drinking raw milk which will make us healthy? One answer is to look at milk in the UK. Nearly all is bought by big concerns at low prices, and is low quality. Milk that is to be sold raw, especially organic, is more expensive to produce, comes from smaller farms and is sold direct to the consumer. The more that people become aware of the benefits of raw milk, the more the demand for raw, and the lower the demand for heat-treated and the lower the profits of the large dairy concerns. So the government has to choose. Either what is good for people. Or what is pro
As a public health inspector/ environmental health officer, I had been taught that heat-treated milk was safer to drink than raw milk. (Heat-treated milk includes pasteurized, sterilised and ultra heat treated.) But I noticed that outbreaks connected to milk or cheese were virtually all in heat-treated milk, not raw milk. After I retired, I researched this. I am now absolutely sure that raw milk has been unfairly blamed. The reason given for heat-treating milk is to kill harmful bacteria such as TB. But heat-treated milk can become contaminated with bacteria such as TB. Raw milk naturally contains bacteria such as lactobacillus, which actually prevent pathogenic bacteria taking hold. So raw is safer than heat-treated. Also, heat-treatment destroys essential enzymes. When you drink pasteurized milk, the body thinks it is under attack. It cannot digest the milk, so you do not get the many benefits of milk. Drinking raw milk is incredibly good for your health. You get many things. Eenzymes, which help to break down the milk. Elements such as calcium. Many bacteria that are essential for health. (75% of the body’s immune system is bacteria in the gut. Healthy gut bacteria are one of the most important factors in health). The reason raw milk is demonized is not scientific, but political. Why would the government encourage us to drink milk that is harmful, and discourage us from drinking raw milk which will make us healthy? One answer is to look at milk in the UK. Nearly all is bought by big concerns at low prices, and is low quality. Milk that is to be sold raw, especially organic, is more expensive to produce, comes from smaller farms and is sold direct to the consumer. The more that people become aware of the benefits of raw milk, the more the demand for raw, and the lower the demand for heat-treated and the lower the profits of the large dairy concerns. So the government has to choose. Either what is good for people. Or what is pro
Please allow raw milk to stay available to the public
Please allow raw milk to stay available to the public
I believe we should be allowed to choose. I strongly believe that we should be able to choose to have foods that have not been 'messed about with'. I can understand the risks - and benefits - and I choose green top; I also believe it is the healthy option.
I believe we should be allowed to choose. I strongly believe that we should be able to choose to have foods that have not been 'messed about with'. I can understand the risks - and benefits - and I choose green top; I also believe it is the healthy option.
We must stop interfering with our food sources. In my opinion Natural Is Best.
We must stop interfering with our food sources. In my opinion Natural Is Best.
l was breast fed , later, we had only raw milk . l have had raw warm milk straight out of the com as a teen ,although never brought up on a farm, but in the Med. for these reasons alone l will be signing this as proof that raw butter ,milk, never harmed me or all the family . l live in uk , the western diet made me very ill , l regret to adhere to it , but last few years , organic always , but we need , food as close to nature intended as poss, as it is ,we are killing future generations. my grand ma ,lived to be 105 when she passed ,she was a herbal injury healer passed from genererations , all my siblings born at home ,no nurse , no doctor no pills ,nothing ,all my grand mothers deliveries ,she has never been to any medical school , 10 of us are healthy today at a ripe age ,god bless nature .
l was breast fed , later, we had only raw milk . l have had raw warm milk straight out of the com as a teen ,although never brought up on a farm, but in the Med. for these reasons alone l will be signing this as proof that raw butter ,milk, never harmed me or all the family . l live in uk , the western diet made me very ill , l regret to adhere to it , but last few years , organic always , but we need , food as close to nature intended as poss, as it is ,we are killing future generations. my grand ma ,lived to be 105 when she passed ,she was a herbal injury healer passed from genererations , all my siblings born at home ,no nurse , no doctor no pills ,nothing ,all my grand mothers deliveries ,she has never been to any medical school , 10 of us are healthy today at a ripe age ,god bless nature .
I like raw milk very much. Far superior than processed milk. That is awful milk.
I like raw milk very much. Far superior than processed milk. That is awful milk.
we need natural milk not unhealthy pasteurised milk that provides us no nourishment at all but encourages ill health!!
we need natural milk not unhealthy pasteurised milk that provides us no nourishment at all but encourages ill health!!
I fully support this campaign
I fully support this campaign
It's not pasteurisation that makes milk "safe". It is done through proper care and treatment of the cows. I don't want fake milk, I just want milk.
It's not pasteurisation that makes milk "safe". It is done through proper care and treatment of the cows. I don't want fake milk, I just want milk.
Considering there is such unbelievable amount of unhealthy people in the UK wouldn't it be sensible to look into raw milk that offer beneficial bacteria to improve our general health?