Keep the Ruby Mountains as undeveloped as possible!

Keep the Rubies wild and free

No need to put more of a crunch on our water supply. The fact that our roads can barely handle the traffic as it is know .

Private use dosen't include disturbing our already delicate ecosystem! I believe this "development " will affect our deer, elk, and possibly even moose for generations to come! We do not have the snow pack to support a ski resort which will in turn cause them to "make" snow! We dont have the water supply for this. Ruby Marsh will suffer because of this not to mention the multi generational ranches.

Keep the rubies beautiful!!

No Ski resort Please~

No to raping the Earth

Jacquline Hansen

I am very concerned with the impact of building all the ski resort infrastructure at a time our winter snow levels are getting less and less.

We do not need a ski area in the Ruby Mountains!

The Ruby Mountains should be left intact and undeveloped as much as possible. I oppose this landowner being issued a permit to build ski lifts.

No

The Ruby Mountains are an invaluable and critical natural resource to Nevada. Putting a Ski resort up there and developing that area would destroy the fragile ecosystem that exists.

Just trying to help the people of Spring Creek to protect the Ruby's

I’m sorry but y’all have no right to build or use this for commercial use. I’m sure that the native nation has the right first don’t make this about black hills fight

Save our mountains!

Majority of the public want this stopped. It goes against current regulations. It will negatively impact the ranches, wildlife and water resources for the area.

Not only for use restriction violations. The inherent eyesore of the proposed lifts would deteriorate the authentic appeal of the Ruby Mountains. The proposed development is in no way secluded to a single canyon or ridge, but covers a large face portion of the mountain scene. I believe this combined with the development proposal of homes, would increase tax rates and the living expense while decreasing general area appeal that the Rubies provide.

Leave the Rubies alone

5 lifts built for just 'family and friends' doesn't make sense. This appears to be a backdoor way of eventually getting the zoning change that was rejected in 2024 so the resort can be commercial and open to the public. As it stands now with 0S zoning, it could be subdivided into 57 lots according the the developer. If the AR zoning was approved to make it public, it could be subdivided into 250 lots, using the same math for the 57 lots. From what I've read, the most money to be made from ski resorts is by selling building lots near the resort. Then there's the lack of snow. The developer says they won't be making snow, but without that capability it doesn't seem like it would be viable for much of the season or even during certain years like this one. For those reasons, and many others, this conditional permit as it stands needs to be denied. Most people aren't against a small resort with low impact activities, it's the 5 ski lifts and accompanying ski runs that has many people questioning the true motives of the developers.

I’m against this ski resort. We have beautiful mountains that had remained untouched by rich society trying to conform simple living to high society standards and ruin our mountains