1) It seems there actually is no need for a taller tower, so why are we even having to consider one? 2)It also seems this should be brought to a new vote since a) many people, myself included, were unable to attend the meeting where the vote was taken and b) there seems to be enough push-back to indicate the citizenry was not adequately informed and/or represent at the meeting.
M
Morna Crites-Moore
11 years ago
Featured
1) It seems there actually is no need for a taller tower, so why are we even having to consider one? 2)It also seems this should be brought to a new vote since a) many people, myself included, were unable to attend the meeting where the vote was taken and b) there seems to be enough push-back to indicate the citizenry was not adequately informed and/or represent at the meeting.
B
Becky Parkin
11 years ago
Featured
No "tree" design that protrudes above the actual tree line should be approved. It is impossible to "camouflage" structures that are out of scale with the surrounding environment.
B
Becky Parkin
11 years ago
Featured
No "tree" design that protrudes above the actual tree line should be approved. It is impossible to "camouflage" structures that are out of scale with the surrounding environment.
C
Charley Couch
11 years ago
Keep to proposed new tower to the existing height.
C
Charley Couch
11 years ago
Keep to proposed new tower to the existing height.
D
Dave Rhodes
11 years ago
Featured
Who thought putting a giant cell tower right on the green was a smart idea? Totally ruins the historic look of the area. Find somewhere else.
No tower !
No tower !
1) It seems there actually is no need for a taller tower, so why are we even having to consider one? 2)It also seems this should be brought to a new vote since a) many people, myself included, were unable to attend the meeting where the vote was taken and b) there seems to be enough push-back to indicate the citizenry was not adequately informed and/or represent at the meeting.
1) It seems there actually is no need for a taller tower, so why are we even having to consider one? 2)It also seems this should be brought to a new vote since a) many people, myself included, were unable to attend the meeting where the vote was taken and b) there seems to be enough push-back to indicate the citizenry was not adequately informed and/or represent at the meeting.
No "tree" design that protrudes above the actual tree line should be approved. It is impossible to "camouflage" structures that are out of scale with the surrounding environment.
No "tree" design that protrudes above the actual tree line should be approved. It is impossible to "camouflage" structures that are out of scale with the surrounding environment.
Keep to proposed new tower to the existing height.
Keep to proposed new tower to the existing height.
Who thought putting a giant cell tower right on the green was a smart idea? Totally ruins the historic look of the area. Find somewhere else.
Alternative please
Alternative please
Find an alternative please
Find an alternative please
don't do it!
don't do it!
No tower near the Parade Ground!!!
No tower near the Parade Ground!!!
No!
No!
[email protected]