No More development! We don't need any more people, cars or pollution in Carlsbad. Timeshare, for goodness sakes, NO!
L
Lisa Kinney
9 years ago
No further development should be allow around the Lagoon. It's waters and our streets can not handle it. If this happens it will ruin and destroy our area and create an unsafe environment for our children!
D
David Ham
9 years ago
Featured
Our lagoon can not handle anymore pollution. Adams street can not handle anymore traffic. This project would make the streets and water unsafe for my children and I and we would have to move out of the area. Please don't let this happen!
J
Jessica Kiko
9 years ago
The projects threatens our safety and way of life due to increased traffic, congestion and water pollution.
D
Dennis Henderson
9 years ago
A timeshare is similar to a hotel and the land use is incompatible with the residential neighborhood.
K
Kevin Bender
9 years ago
Not wanted by residents. Not needed. Not good.
S
Susan Sauter
9 years ago
This is a horrible project. The lagoon is taxed to the max as it is, as are our residential streets. NO..NO..NO good to our community will come of this project
A
Alex Torreblanca
9 years ago
NO to the project.
S
Shirley Forsch
9 years ago
This should not be in an area of single family homes!
J
Janis Bandich
9 years ago
This 20=unit Timeshare proposal is completely inappropriate for a residential neighbor, for the impact on the Lagoon, and for the traffic issues on Adams.
D
Debra Mullin
9 years ago
I am against the proposed 20 unit timeshare on Adams
Street.
T
Thomas Shearer
9 years ago
I live near Park and Bayshore and I am also a bicyclist. The safest route to get to Coast Hwy is along Adams Street. If the development is approved El Camino Real would be my only option.
K
Kristine Wright
9 years ago
I object to the development of 20 unit time share at the Carlsbad Boat club on Adams St. This project is to large for such a small area of land and has been successfully used in the past as having restaurants.
S
Sharon Johnson
9 years ago
the north side of the lagoon is a residential area it does not need a timeshare.
D
Deborah Cowden
9 years ago
We live near the south end of Highland, just above Adams and the lagoon, and the neighborhood cannot support extra traffic. Neither can the lagoon support any extra pollution. I've seen first hand how vacation rentals effect our quiet neighborhood, as the house across the street from us was sold to investors and is now a vacation rental. Non residents are rude, noisy at night, perhaps not realizing we enjoy, and deserve, our privacy and quiet.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
We live on Highland Dr and are 100% against this!
S
Syndi Poling
9 years ago
I live on the lagoon
J
James Courtney
9 years ago
Before signing this petition, please be advised that it contains misleading and false statements in all 3 stated reasons.
Statement # 1 is FALSE! Please read the Staff report to the Planning Commission to learn the truth.
Statement # 2 is FALSE! Common sense will tell you, that it's simply an outrageous statement!
Statement # 3 is FALSE! He says, "Adams has 7 blind curves and is only 5% paved". That's ridiculous! It's a standard city street, and is paved. Drive down Adams St. and see for yourself.
A commercial restaurant and Boat club have been operating at this site,since the 1950s, charged with approximately 570 trips per day. The timeshare project will generate 200 trips per day, which is about 60% LESS! That is correct: It reduces the traffic far below the previous allowed coomercial uses and makes the street safer. Check with the City for the actual facts.
If you have already signed this petition, because you took the word of one person who has an ulterior motive, I recommend you have your name deleted before it is soiled when the truth is revealed.
L
Libby Ward
9 years ago
Featured
Adams street absolutely CANNOT accommodate a timeshare! Way too many people in one place. I can't imagine all the cars going in and out through that small street, speeding around those dangerous curves. My parked car got hit last week! It could have been a person!
Horrible idea
No More development! We don't need any more people, cars or pollution in Carlsbad. Timeshare, for goodness sakes, NO!
No further development should be allow around the Lagoon. It's waters and our streets can not handle it. If this happens it will ruin and destroy our area and create an unsafe environment for our children!
Our lagoon can not handle anymore pollution. Adams street can not handle anymore traffic. This project would make the streets and water unsafe for my children and I and we would have to move out of the area. Please don't let this happen!
The projects threatens our safety and way of life due to increased traffic, congestion and water pollution.
A timeshare is similar to a hotel and the land use is incompatible with the residential neighborhood.
Not wanted by residents. Not needed. Not good.
This is a horrible project. The lagoon is taxed to the max as it is, as are our residential streets. NO..NO..NO good to our community will come of this project
NO to the project.
This should not be in an area of single family homes!
This 20=unit Timeshare proposal is completely inappropriate for a residential neighbor, for the impact on the Lagoon, and for the traffic issues on Adams.
I am against the proposed 20 unit timeshare on Adams Street.
I live near Park and Bayshore and I am also a bicyclist. The safest route to get to Coast Hwy is along Adams Street. If the development is approved El Camino Real would be my only option.
I object to the development of 20 unit time share at the Carlsbad Boat club on Adams St. This project is to large for such a small area of land and has been successfully used in the past as having restaurants.
the north side of the lagoon is a residential area it does not need a timeshare.
We live near the south end of Highland, just above Adams and the lagoon, and the neighborhood cannot support extra traffic. Neither can the lagoon support any extra pollution. I've seen first hand how vacation rentals effect our quiet neighborhood, as the house across the street from us was sold to investors and is now a vacation rental. Non residents are rude, noisy at night, perhaps not realizing we enjoy, and deserve, our privacy and quiet.
We live on Highland Dr and are 100% against this!
I live on the lagoon
Before signing this petition, please be advised that it contains misleading and false statements in all 3 stated reasons. Statement # 1 is FALSE! Please read the Staff report to the Planning Commission to learn the truth. Statement # 2 is FALSE! Common sense will tell you, that it's simply an outrageous statement! Statement # 3 is FALSE! He says, "Adams has 7 blind curves and is only 5% paved". That's ridiculous! It's a standard city street, and is paved. Drive down Adams St. and see for yourself. A commercial restaurant and Boat club have been operating at this site,since the 1950s, charged with approximately 570 trips per day. The timeshare project will generate 200 trips per day, which is about 60% LESS! That is correct: It reduces the traffic far below the previous allowed coomercial uses and makes the street safer. Check with the City for the actual facts. If you have already signed this petition, because you took the word of one person who has an ulterior motive, I recommend you have your name deleted before it is soiled when the truth is revealed.
Adams street absolutely CANNOT accommodate a timeshare! Way too many people in one place. I can't imagine all the cars going in and out through that small street, speeding around those dangerous curves. My parked car got hit last week! It could have been a person!