JUSTICE AND ARBITRARINESS. THE 10/N1 COMMISSION OF THE ITALIAN NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC QUALIFICATION 2012. With more than 230 signatories.

Subjective judgment is essential, but so is adherence to the criteria established for assessment, in order to produce an outcome that even those disadvantaged by it can accept.

UNIPV

Researcher, Visiting Researcher and Sponsor University Associate, Georgetown University

Socio straniero dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei

PD Dr., Ägyptologisches Seminar, Freie Universität Berlin

Ordinario di Storia Moderna, Università dell'Insubria

Research Archaeologist, Israel Antiquities Authority

PhD Candidate- EPHE-Sorbonne, Paris (France)

Instructor in Assyriology, University of Chicago

please adopt internationally standard criteria and procedures

PhD Candidate - Ghent University

PhD Student, Religions and Thought Systems, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, France

Personal competence of evaluators may well reach beyond narrow limits of subjects. But disregard of basic formal rules, if proved, is a fatal flaw in the procedure.

I support you!

Considerare di "limitato apporto scientifico" la revisione dei testi di Qumran (di Florentino Garcia Martinez) e' un insulto alla ragionevolezza scientifica.

l'arbitrarietà nelle valutazioni scientifiche distrugge la credibilità del sistema accademico italiano. servono criteri trasparenti e oggettivi, non giudizi calati dall'alto senza fondamento.