认同世界卫生组织，终止疫苗歧视 - 中文版本在英文版本之后 Join WHO to End Vaccine Discrimination

Pfizer and Moderna was only given Emergency Use status by the American FDA not licensed. So their status is the same as Sinovac. Stop being an American dog.

Thailand MOH certified Sinovac is 99.4% effective!

Stop the discrimination right here & now... or else there will be more of such & worse!

The Pap govt. should own up that they have made a mistake and apologise. Sinovac has been adminitered to the world's most populated countries and it is still being used. Isn't that enough proof! Stop thinking of money only. Start caring for the people!

STOP Being Anti-China

What discrimination!

All vaccines approved by WHO should be given equal treatment by the Government with no discrimination of the country of origin. What would the Government react if the Chinese Government do the same to non-chinese vaccines. Especially no governments is able to guarantee no side effects for vaccination of any vaccine.

Fully agree with you. If Sinovac vaccine is not treated on par with Pfizer and other mRNA vaccine it should not have been allowed to be used in the first place.

Prefer Sinovac

I hope the government can treat those who have the Sinova jab equally with pfzer jab

Any vaccination is vaccination!

Do we know more than WHO.

As Sinovac is WHO approved vaccine, there should be equal standing with Pfizer, moderna and all other approved Covid 19. Vaccines. There shouldn’t be any discrimination

I fully support the petition

FLU VACCINE HISTORY: "The very first monovalent flu vaccine was invented in 1938 and was widely used to inoculate United States defence forces during World War 2. The first bivalent influenza vaccine was developed in 1942 as a response to the discovery of Influenza Type B. In 1978, the first trivalent flu vaccine was introduced." PFIZER VACCINE HISTORY: "How Pfizer Delivered a Covid Vaccine in Record Time: Crazy Deadlines, a Pushy CEO Albert Bourla and his team overcame unproven science and manufacturing bottlenecks; ‘you’re asking for too much’" Why does a 1-2 year technology safe enough for approval, but a Covid vaccine based on a 70 year technology not recognised. EFFICACY: The flu vaccine is 44% effective. The Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine: "2 June 2021 SAGE recommends the use of Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine as 2 doses (0.5 ml) given intramuscularly. WHO recommends an interval of 2–4 weeks between the first and second dose. It is recommended that all vaccinated individuals receive two doses. How efficacious is the vaccine? A large phase 3 trial in Brazil showed that two doses, administered at an interval of 14 days, had an efficacy of 51% against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, 100% against severe COVID-19, and 100% against hospitalization starting 14 days after receiving the second dose." "The Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine 11 February 2021 Updated on 17 March 2021 to reflect the fact that WHO has listed two versions of the AstraZeneca/Oxford COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use. A further update was made on 19 April 2021 to reflect the latest WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety statement. How efficacious is the vaccine? The AZD1222 vaccine against COVID-19 has an efficacy of 63.09% against symptomatic SARS-C

To have one more choice is always better!

Sinovac is worth a fair treatment and respect as US mRNA vaccine

I took SinoVac vaccine because of drugs allergic, prior the vaccine, I even registered my interest for Pfizer vaccine & inform my allergies to seek advice fm MOH, but no response ever, and it was on 18 June 21, the moment government approved SinoVac in 24 private clinic, hence I registered & got the appt for SinoVac vaccine on 22 June 21. I feel cheated & upset on the announcement by MOH that my vaccination is not considered & with dif treatment.

Please join WHO to End Vaccine Discrimination...

if it works, it should be recognized.