The jan/feb supp exam questions where long and very tough.Previous assignment have wrong memos which is worrying, for you are not sure if what you are writting in the exam is correct or not.
S
Sylvia MABUZA
6 years ago
Unfair examination
S
Sylvia MABUZA
6 years ago
Unfair examination
J
Joshua simon mogano
6 years ago
Featured
Not happy with exam of power systems
1st exam fair, got cancelled
2nd exam tough, the markings are not realistsic
We expect a supp, since we wer forced to 2nd exam
A
Akinmade temitope Thompson
6 years ago
Lack of synergy for the institution on the exam first missing information on the exam term leading to shifting and scheduling for jan/feb paper which came without plans on areas to read for exams secondly done with tough questions and short time which all tried but the institution intentionally failed the students to 99% failure which I personally sought.
S
Sbonelo Mathenjwa
6 years ago
Unfair and unprofessional treatment from Unisa
V
Vusani
6 years ago
Featured
The decision to nullify nov main exam was wrong, the institution was at fault and unprofessional by sending incoherent instructions, hence I think it was only fair that the scripts be marked and those who pass, be exempted from rewriting the exam.The scheduled date was a huge inconvenience to students and no scope was given for re-write exam.
M
Mdumiseni Langa
6 years ago
To me UNISA is a money making scheme, they don't care about students, they will do which ever way they want, students will fail even six times as long as they come back to register UNISA continues make money.
It is even confusing to students regarding assignment memos that are issued out by unisa to help students understand how did they go wrong on their assignments. Assignments Memos are wrong and assignments are also marked wrong. These problems were brought to the lecturer's attention but she or he never bothered to help.
If assignments memos are wrong how like that these final examinations are marked correct or even marked using correct memos.
Considering Oct/Nov 2019 exams.:
Some exam centers wrote a close book exam(victim) and some wrote an open book exam.
Time (3hours) allocate to write this exam is too little and I feel that it must be 4hours to 4hours 30 minutes
On the exam paper we were even referred to figures that were not on the exam paper.
Jan/Feb exam which was a remedial for the main exam , the content of the exam was not from prescribed book and not even in relevance to how the prescribed book guided students on this syllabus.
I support this petition 100%
A
Amora Martins
6 years ago
I support this petition
T
Tivani Haseness Baloyi
6 years ago
Featured
This was very unprofessional, the October exam was a mess, some questions referred us to certain diagrams which were non-existant. We had to write an exam where the mistakes were not our own, we had to take leave again at work. We got an order that the October exam had to be re-written, our opinion was not asked, then we took leave again only to find the exam that was not fair, in terms of difficulty, the October one was easier, I couldn't even finish the exam, now my results came back failed no more supp. This is so unprofessional, the October exan was supposed to be marked and only the questions that were compromised should have been left out.
N
Nicholas Motubatsi
6 years ago
I support this course, the university treated us unfairly. I don't the examination results are authentic.
The jan/feb supp exam questions where long and very tough.Previous assignment have wrong memos which is worrying, for you are not sure if what you are writting in the exam is correct or not.
Unfair examination
Unfair examination
Not happy with exam of power systems 1st exam fair, got cancelled 2nd exam tough, the markings are not realistsic We expect a supp, since we wer forced to 2nd exam
Lack of synergy for the institution on the exam first missing information on the exam term leading to shifting and scheduling for jan/feb paper which came without plans on areas to read for exams secondly done with tough questions and short time which all tried but the institution intentionally failed the students to 99% failure which I personally sought.
Unfair and unprofessional treatment from Unisa
The decision to nullify nov main exam was wrong, the institution was at fault and unprofessional by sending incoherent instructions, hence I think it was only fair that the scripts be marked and those who pass, be exempted from rewriting the exam.The scheduled date was a huge inconvenience to students and no scope was given for re-write exam.
To me UNISA is a money making scheme, they don't care about students, they will do which ever way they want, students will fail even six times as long as they come back to register UNISA continues make money. It is even confusing to students regarding assignment memos that are issued out by unisa to help students understand how did they go wrong on their assignments. Assignments Memos are wrong and assignments are also marked wrong. These problems were brought to the lecturer's attention but she or he never bothered to help. If assignments memos are wrong how like that these final examinations are marked correct or even marked using correct memos. Considering Oct/Nov 2019 exams.: Some exam centers wrote a close book exam(victim) and some wrote an open book exam. Time (3hours) allocate to write this exam is too little and I feel that it must be 4hours to 4hours 30 minutes On the exam paper we were even referred to figures that were not on the exam paper. Jan/Feb exam which was a remedial for the main exam , the content of the exam was not from prescribed book and not even in relevance to how the prescribed book guided students on this syllabus. I support this petition 100%
I support this petition
This was very unprofessional, the October exam was a mess, some questions referred us to certain diagrams which were non-existant. We had to write an exam where the mistakes were not our own, we had to take leave again at work. We got an order that the October exam had to be re-written, our opinion was not asked, then we took leave again only to find the exam that was not fair, in terms of difficulty, the October one was easier, I couldn't even finish the exam, now my results came back failed no more supp. This is so unprofessional, the October exan was supposed to be marked and only the questions that were compromised should have been left out.
I support this course, the university treated us unfairly. I don't the examination results are authentic.
I agree and support this petition 100%