If you live in low income housing managed by IPM in the city of Portland Oregon and you are Disabled, Or a Volunteer, and have made complaints about IPM and have been a victim of retalition please sign our petition! according to ORS.
(1) Except as provided in this section, a landlord may not retaliate by increasing rent or decreasing services, by serving a notice to terminate the tenancy or by bringing or threatening to bring an action for possession after:
(a) The tenant has complained to, or expressed to the landlord in writing an intention to complain to, a governmental agency charged with responsibility for enforcement of any of the following concerning a violation applicable to the tenancy:
(A) A building, health or housing code materially affecting health or safety;
(B) Laws or regulations concerning the delivery of mail; or
(C) Laws or regulations prohibiting discrimination in rental housing;
(b) The tenant has made any complaint to the landlord that is in good faith and related to the tenancy;
(c) The tenant has organized or become a member of a tenants� union or similar organization;
(d) The tenant has testified against the landlord in any judicial, administrative or legislative proceeding;
(e) The tenant successfully defended an action for possession brought by the landlord within the previous six months except if the tenant was successful in defending the action only because:
(A) The termination notice by the landlord was not served or delivered in the manner required by ORS 90.155; or
(B) The period provided by the termination notice was less than that required by the statute upon which the notice relied to terminate the tenancy; or
(f) The tenant has performed or expressed intent to perform any other act for the purpose of asserting, protecting or invoking the protection of any right secured to tenants under any federal, state or local law.
(2) As used in subsection (1) of this section, �decreasing services� includes:
(a) Unreasonably restricting the availability of or placing unreasonable burdens on the use of common areas or facilities by tenant associations or tenants meeting to establish a tenant organization; and
(b) Intentionally and unreasonably interfering with and substantially impairing the enjoyment or use of the premises by the tenant.
(3) If the landlord acts in violation of subsection (1) of this section the tenant is entitled to the remedies provided in ORS 90.375 and has a defense in any retaliatory action against the tenant for possession.
(4) Notwithstanding subsections (1) and (3) of this section, a landlord may bring an action for possession if:
(a) The complaint by the tenant was made to the landlord or an agent of the landlord in an unreasonable manner or at an unreasonable time or was repeated in a manner having the effect of unreasonably harassing the landlord. A determination whether the manner, time or effect of a complaint was unreasonable shall include consideration of all related circumstances preceding or contemporaneous to the complaint;
(b) The violation of the applicable building or housing code was caused primarily by lack of reasonable care by the tenant or other person in the household of the tenant or upon the premises with the consent of the tenant;
(c) The tenant is in default in rent; or
(d) Compliance with the applicable building or housing code requires alteration, remodeling or demolition which would effectively deprive the tenant of use of the dwelling unit.
(5) For purposes of this section, a complaint made by another on behalf of a tenant is considered a complaint by the tenant.
(6) For the purposes of subsection (4)(c) of this section, a tenant who has paid rent into court pursuant to ORS 90.370 shall not be considered to be in default in rent.
(7) The maintenance of an action under subsection (4) of this section does not release the landlord from liability under ORS 90.360 (2). [Formerly 91.865; 1995 c.559 §25; 1997 c.303 §1; 1999 c.603 §23]
I am currently compiling the stories from those of you who have faced retaliation for reporting code violations. Email your specific documentation to your local housing advocate today. We need to force IPM to respect the protections guaranteed under state law.
October 18, 2009
Reaching this milestone proves that IPM cannot continue to ignore these retaliatory practices against our community. Post the petition link on your Facebook page today and email your City Commissioner to demand an investigation into these housing violations.
7 Comments
K
Kyle Pillsbury
2 years ago
Featured
IPM management did nothing after a neighbor if mine tried to murder me in front of them, nor when he continued threatening me for months. He's not awaiting trial for attempting to murder me. A 2nd time inside a Plaid Pantry.
N
Nikki Jones
12 years ago
Featured
I have witnessed harrassment and illegal treatment of my friend who lives at Kinnamon Townhouses in Aloha OR. She should not have to put up with maintenance man touching and harrassing her. Her companion pets were okay when she moved in and now there is an eviction notice for the pets and her.
S
Sarah Kennedy
16 years ago
Featured
They tried to raise my rent 200 dollars just cuz i asked them to fix the mold in the bathroom. Total joke.
M
Mike Mendoza
16 years ago
Featured
IPM is the worst company i ever dealt with. They ignore everything untill you get a lawyer involved.
R
Robert Duncan
16 years ago
Featured
They kicked me out for complaining about the rats in the walls. They are slumlords.
J
Jessica Marshall
16 years ago
Featured
my apartment has no heat for 3 weeks and they keep telling me im crazy. fix it!!!!
K
Kathy Wilson
12 years ago
Complete retaliation!
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
If you live in low income housing managed by IPM in the city of Portland Oregon and you are Disabled, Or a Volunteer, and have made complaints about IPM and have been a victim of retalition please sign our petition! according to ORS.
(1) Except as provided in this section, a landlord may not retaliate by increasing rent or decreasing services, by serving a notice to terminate the tenancy or by bringing or threatening to bring an action for possession after:
(a) The tenant has complained to, or expressed to the landlord in writing an intention to complain to, a governmental agency charged with responsibility for enforcement of any of the following concerning a violation applicable to the tenancy:
(A) A building, health or housing code materially affecting health or safety;
(B) Laws or regulations concerning the delivery of mail; or
(C) Laws or regulations prohibiting discrimination in rental housing;
(b) The tenant has made any complaint to the landlord that is in good faith and related to the tenancy;
(c) The tenant has organized or become a member of a tenants� union or similar organization;
(d) The tenant has testified against the landlord in any judicial, administrative or legislative proceeding;
(e) The tenant successfully defended an action for possession brought by the landlord within the previous six months except if the tenant was successful in defending the action only because:
(A) The termination notice by the landlord was not served or delivered in the manner required by ORS 90.155; or
(B) The period provided by the termination notice was less than that required by the statute upon which the notice relied to terminate the tenancy; or
(f) The tenant has performed or expressed intent to perform any other act for the purpose of asserting, protecting or invoking the protection of any right secured to tenants under any federal, state or local law.
(2) As used in subsection (1) of this section, �decreasing services� includes:
(a) Unreasonably restricting the availability of or placing unreasonable burdens on the use of common areas or facilities by tenant associations or tenants meeting to establish a tenant organization; and
(b) Intentionally and unreasonably interfering with and substantially impairing the enjoyment or use of the premises by the tenant.
(3) If the landlord acts in violation of subsection (1) of this section the tenant is entitled to the remedies provided in ORS 90.375 and has a defense in any retaliatory action against the tenant for possession.
(4) Notwithstanding subsections (1) and (3) of this section, a landlord may bring an action for possession if:
(a) The complaint by the tenant was made to the landlord or an agent of the landlord in an unreasonable manner or at an unreasonable time or was repeated in a manner having the effect of unreasonably harassing the landlord. A determination whether the manner, time or effect of a complaint was unreasonable shall include consideration of all related circumstances preceding or contemporaneous to the complaint;
(b) The violation of the applicable building or housing code was caused primarily by lack of reasonable care by the tenant or other person in the household of the tenant or upon the premises with the consent of the tenant;
(c) The tenant is in default in rent; or
(d) Compliance with the applicable building or housing code requires alteration, remodeling or demolition which would effectively deprive the tenant of use of the dwelling unit.
(5) For purposes of this section, a complaint made by another on behalf of a tenant is considered a complaint by the tenant.
(6) For the purposes of subsection (4)(c) of this section, a tenant who has paid rent into court pursuant to ORS 90.370 shall not be considered to be in default in rent.
(7) The maintenance of an action under subsection (4) of this section does not release the landlord from liability under ORS 90.360 (2). [Formerly 91.865; 1995 c.559 §25; 1997 c.303 §1; 1999 c.603 §23]
I am currently compiling the stories from those of you who have faced retaliation for reporting code violations. Email your specific documentation to your local housing advocate today. We need to force IPM to respect the protections guaranteed under state law.
October 18, 2009
Reaching this milestone proves that IPM cannot continue to ignore these retaliatory practices against our community. Post the petition link on your Facebook page today and email your City Commissioner to demand an investigation into these housing violations.
7 Comments
K
Kyle Pillsbury
2 years ago
Featured
IPM management did nothing after a neighbor if mine tried to murder me in front of them, nor when he continued threatening me for months. He's not awaiting trial for attempting to murder me. A 2nd time inside a Plaid Pantry.
N
Nikki Jones
12 years ago
Featured
I have witnessed harrassment and illegal treatment of my friend who lives at Kinnamon Townhouses in Aloha OR. She should not have to put up with maintenance man touching and harrassing her. Her companion pets were okay when she moved in and now there is an eviction notice for the pets and her.
S
Sarah Kennedy
16 years ago
Featured
They tried to raise my rent 200 dollars just cuz i asked them to fix the mold in the bathroom. Total joke.
M
Mike Mendoza
16 years ago
Featured
IPM is the worst company i ever dealt with. They ignore everything untill you get a lawyer involved.
R
Robert Duncan
16 years ago
Featured
They kicked me out for complaining about the rats in the walls. They are slumlords.
J
Jessica Marshall
16 years ago
Featured
my apartment has no heat for 3 weeks and they keep telling me im crazy. fix it!!!!
IPM management did nothing after a neighbor if mine tried to murder me in front of them, nor when he continued threatening me for months. He's not awaiting trial for attempting to murder me. A 2nd time inside a Plaid Pantry.