INCLUDE THE BOOK OF ENOCH IN THE BIBLE NOW!!!
25
people have signed this petition. Add your name now!
25
people have signed. Add your voice!
1%
Maxine K. signed
just now
Adam B. signed
just now
"For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." —Hebrews 4:12
I'm a follower of Jesus Christ's teachings since my tender age. I believe everything the biblical doctrines teach us about our Saviour Jesus Christ, and that he is the way, the truth and the life. I'm also fully aware that Jews did not accept Christ as the Messiah till his death, and that they(the Jews) still do not recognise his verily existence and teachings.
This failure by the Jews, atheists and some who do not believe in the teachings of the Son of Man has pushed me to write this letter, which shall be the first big step by and for real Christians worldwide in the campaign to preserve the Holy Scriptures and the fight against the anti-Christ that was prophesied in the Bible.
The bone of contention is the deliberate exclusion of the Book of Enoch by those that have given themselves spiritual authority over the Holy Scriptures, that include the Bible.
It is true that God inspired the writing of the Bible, but it is false that God compiled the Bible.
It is true that a real prophet helps spread the Good News, yet it is false that everybody involved in such an enormous and very demanding task is a prophet.
It is true that the Bible binds together families and nations, but the status quo proves that preachers, believers, non-believers, atheists, Christians, non-Christians, publishers and self-proclaimed theologians and pretending scholars have sown the seed of the anti-Christ and divisons, as is evident with the different versions of the Bible.
It is very funny that some loud-mouthed self-professed watchdogs paint the New International Version(NIV), which is published by Zondervan, owned by Harper Collins, who also publish the Satanic Verses, as a purely Satanic version.
It is equally damning that there remains controversies surrounding the King James Version(KJV) pertaining to so-called Freemasonry connections around the 16th century, another Satanic occult.
Having argued my point concerning the controversies that have tainted the reputation, truthfulness, authority and independence of the major Bible versions that are in circulation worldwide, I cannot find a substantiated claim as to why the Book of Enoch remains in the wilderness, many centuries after it was rejected by those who pleased in satisfying and heeding the unholy choices of their masters, who completely dismissed the Holy Spirit that inspired Enoch's prophecies of a coming 'Messias' as 'crap.'
To quote the wikipedia, 'One possible reason for Jewish rejection of the book might be the textual nature of several early sections of the book that make use of material from the Torah; for example, 1 En 1 is a midrash of Deuteronomy 33.[8][9] The content, particularly detailed descriptions of fallen angels, would also be a reason for rejection from the Hebrew canon at this period – as illustrated by the comments of Trypho the Jew when debating with Justin Martyr on this subject. Trypho: "The utterances of God are holy, but your expositions are mere contrivances, as is plain from what has been explained by you; nay, even blasphemies, for you assert that angels sinned and revolted from God." (Dialogue 79) [10]'
Wikipedia continues, 'The book is referred to, and quoted, in Jude 14–15:
"And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these [men], saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints, To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him."
Compare this with Enoch 1:9, translated from the Ethiopic (found also in Qumran scroll 4Q204=4QEnochc ar, col I 16–18):[11]
"And behold! He cometh with ten thousands of His holy ones To execute judgment upon all, And to destroy all the ungodly: And to convict all flesh Of all the works of their ungodliness which they have ungodly committed, And of all the hard things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him."
Compare this also with what may be the original source of 1 En 1:9 in Deuteronomy 33:2:[12][13][14]
"The Lord came from Sinai and dawned from Seir upon us; he shone forth from Mount Paran; he came from the ten thousands of holy ones, with flaming fire at his right hand."
If the NIV and the KJV are entangled in unending commentaries as to whether nobody tampered with which version, when and how, then I would like to conclude that the Book of Enoch should be automatically canonical since it is free from such street-talk assumptions, yet governments and Christians worldwide continue to suppress it into extinction.
Yes, I blame Christians for failing to gang up, gather the zeal and speak louder, in order to excavate the truth concerning the validity of the Book of Enoch and do justice for the good of the Holy Scriptures. Let me remind you of this warning:
"...for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God." —Jeremiah 23:36
It is a shame that scholars only go to universities to embrace the Bible and write lengthy, confusing, imaginary and sometimes exciting biblical commentaries only to graduate into teaching bible studies, other than going deeper and try to 'walk the talk,' just like the biblical prophets who always sought to find and speak the truth.
I believe that scholars and theologians should start to boycott bible studies until the valid reasons are given why the Book of Enoch cannot be incorporated into the Holy Bible.
The challenge now is for them to ask who is behind endorsing 'a widely-accepted Bible,' the publishing of different versions and the reasons why, and who is funding or influencing publishers to overlook the Holy Book of Enoch.
The other challenge is whether or not surveys have been done in the form of asking Christians what they think after reading the Book of Enoch, and which countries are likely to reject or accept it as Godly-inspired, the reasons for rejection or acceptance, and the significance of the Book of Enoch vis-a-vis The Messiah, The Bible, the New Testament, Christians or Christianity.
Here is another very interesting passage from Wikipedia, which highly contributes to my argument that the exclusion of the Book of Enoch from the Bible is because of its mentions of Jesus Christ:
'The Book of Enoch was considered as Scripture in the Epistle of Barnabas (16:4)[23] and by many of the early Church Fathers, such as Athenagoras,[24]Clement of Alexandria,[25]Irenaeus[26] and Tertullian,[27] who wrote c. 200 that the Book of Enoch had been rejected by the Jews because it contained prophecies pertaining to Christ.[28] However, later Fathers denied the canonicity of the book, and some even considered the letter of Jude uncanonical because it refers to an "apocryphal" work.[29]'
If we do not act now to include the Book of Enoch as part of the Holy Bible, surely, I say unto you, the sword of terror shall befall all that have departed from the Word, the Word that is Jesus Christ!
I'm of the very strong opinion that since the Book of Enoch is Heavenly-inspired as per my analysis above, endorsing it for inclusion in the Bible will not be a sin at all.
We need the Holy Spirit to guide us from now onwards, so that we may not find ourselves in Sheol(Hell), as the Book of Enoch says. It is the Holy Sciptures that teach us:
Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.” —Deuteronomy 4:2
I will be glad if you start to act and campaign positively towards the publishing of the Book of Enoch as part of the Holy Bible.
In the Holy Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Amen!
by Fanuel Nsingo
Genesis 5 vs 24: Enoch walked with God; then he was no more, because God took him away.
Comment