UCU supports appraisal schemes that focus on supporting staff and the principle of professional development.
The recent introduction of the numerical grading system into appraisals at Anglia Ruskin University brings questionable and subjective criteria for the assessment of staff and ranking of performance.
UCU advocates:
- Co-operation, rather than competition between staff - Support, not demoralisation or demotivation - Appraisal as a joint, professional task, shared between appraiser and appraisee
UCU at Anglia Ruskin University believe that the use of this new performance management tool in our appraisal system is heavy-handed, unacceptable and detrimental.
We are concerned about:
- The potential for the introduction of a rank and yank policy - The potentially negative and disproportionate impact on under-represented groups - Expectations around teaching and research performance may be unfair and inconsistent - Ranking staff establishes winners and losers, which fosters competition amongst staff
UCU rejects the numerical grading system and proposes that it is removed from the appraisal scheme.
Please sign the petition to add your voice to our campaign and make sure that colleagues know about the issue. Pass this information on.
The petition will close on 14 September 2012, and will be presented to ARU management only if we have more than 100 signatures.
The administration has acknowledged our petition and requested a formal meeting to discuss these concerns. I am currently drafting a briefing document that details our specific objections to the numerical grading system to present during this session.
6 Comments
L
Liam Mendoza
14 years ago
Featured
FIX THIS NOW. Education shouldnt be about quotas.
M
Mark Quinn
14 years ago
Featured
We are people not just data points. Management needs to stop with these bean counting exercises and let us do our jobs.
D
David Perry
14 years ago
Featured
Academic work isnt a machine assembly line. Stop the rankings.
J
Jo Alvarez
14 years ago
Featured
My department is already stressed enough. This just makes everyone look over their shoulder instead of helping each other out.
E
Elena Mathis
14 years ago
Featured
Totally agree. Rank and yank is a terrible idea for a university environment.
S
Sarah Huang
14 years ago
Featured
This is just a way to try and justify cutting people later. Ridiculous.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
UCU supports appraisal schemes that focus on supporting staff and the principle of professional development.
The recent introduction of the numerical grading system into appraisals at Anglia Ruskin University brings questionable and subjective criteria for the assessment of staff and ranking of performance.
UCU advocates:
- Co-operation, rather than competition between staff - Support, not demoralisation or demotivation - Appraisal as a joint, professional task, shared between appraiser and appraisee
UCU at Anglia Ruskin University believe that the use of this new performance management tool in our appraisal system is heavy-handed, unacceptable and detrimental.
We are concerned about:
- The potential for the introduction of a rank and yank policy - The potentially negative and disproportionate impact on under-represented groups - Expectations around teaching and research performance may be unfair and inconsistent - Ranking staff establishes winners and losers, which fosters competition amongst staff
UCU rejects the numerical grading system and proposes that it is removed from the appraisal scheme.
Please sign the petition to add your voice to our campaign and make sure that colleagues know about the issue. Pass this information on.
The petition will close on 14 September 2012, and will be presented to ARU management only if we have more than 100 signatures.
The administration has acknowledged our petition and requested a formal meeting to discuss these concerns. I am currently drafting a briefing document that details our specific objections to the numerical grading system to present during this session.
6 Comments
L
Liam Mendoza
14 years ago
Featured
FIX THIS NOW. Education shouldnt be about quotas.
M
Mark Quinn
14 years ago
Featured
We are people not just data points. Management needs to stop with these bean counting exercises and let us do our jobs.
D
David Perry
14 years ago
Featured
Academic work isnt a machine assembly line. Stop the rankings.
J
Jo Alvarez
14 years ago
Featured
My department is already stressed enough. This just makes everyone look over their shoulder instead of helping each other out.
E
Elena Mathis
14 years ago
Featured
Totally agree. Rank and yank is a terrible idea for a university environment.
S
Sarah Huang
14 years ago
Featured
This is just a way to try and justify cutting people later. Ridiculous.
FIX THIS NOW. Education shouldnt be about quotas.