Skip to main content

HWY 97 IN PLACE

58 Comments

L
Lex Lindsay
9 years ago

Don't 'bypass' Peachland or it will become a ghost town not a lovely small town on a lake

G
greg nicholls
10 years ago

Plse make Highway 97 safer through an upgrading program.

G
greg nicholls
10 years ago

Highway 97 requires upgrading to facilitate the flow of traffic but more importantly, for safety reasons!

I
Irena Skalbania
10 years ago

Construction for human convenience must be balanced with natural landscape.

S
Stan Warkentin
10 years ago

Widen the existing only then think about bypasses and second crossing.

L
Lance leduc
10 years ago

Stop wrecking nature

B
Bob Vannan
10 years ago

Look ahead without destruction!

T
Tara Jennens
10 years ago

It's not ours to compromise

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Our wildlife & habitat must be considered.

C
Caleb Wilkison
10 years ago

Definitely need to protect the surrounding wildlife and watershed. No need for a new area bypass.

N
Nina Armitage
10 years ago

Just say NO

T
Therese Steuri
10 years ago

The beauty of the Okanagan landscape needs to be preserved instead of blasted away.

B
Bruce Bradshaw
10 years ago

ours in conservation

L
Lesley Niblow
10 years ago

Against the bypass.

R
Rob Hasenbank
10 years ago Featured

This highway would mean the distraction of the area we have used for children's outdoor education since the early 50's at Maple Springs. I am totally against the bypass.

G
Geordie Robertson
10 years ago

Leave 97 where it is.

R
robert trotman
10 years ago

leave hwy where it is , if the speed limits where in forced there would not be as many accidents if any major ones , and traffic fic would flow better

D
Dave Humes
10 years ago

keep by pass where it is

P
Pati Hill
10 years ago

Please do the right thing and place a bypass where it will do the least damage at less cost.

M
Maurice Rolke
10 years ago

This bypass is the wrong way to go to solve a few traffic problems!