Skip to main content

Hurlie substation resubmission objection-Save Our Mearns

434 Comments

L
Laura Simpson
1 year ago

The additional information submitted by the developer fails to correct previous errors or address valid objections. Serious quality assurance failures, misleading or incomplete environmental assessments, poor public consultation practices, and unsuitable compensatory measures all contribute to continued and valid opposition to the proposed development.

C
Colin Keenan
1 year ago

The public consultation were full of half truths & maybes. If you asked a question you would be fobbed of with the promise of an email response which never happened.

S
Shona Alexander
1 year ago

This race for net zero must be stopped immediately. SSEN have gone for the cheapest option to live the pockets of their shareholders with not a thought to those impacted along the length of the OHL and close to the substations. Time for common sense to prevail

A
Alan Joiner
1 year ago

This OHL should not be routed through rural NE Scotland. Plenty options offshore.

A
AVRIL BARNETT
1 year ago

This can not proceed - do the right thing and reject!!

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

I agree with everything raised in this petition

J
Joanna Ritchie
1 year ago

Destroying the countryside is not the answer

S
Susan Smith
1 year ago

I object to this planned substation there is too much industrialisation planned in this area.

D
David Potter
1 year ago

I agree with objecting to all the flaws and lack of necessary corrections to the original submission in the up-dated re-submission i.e. important points / errors have still not been adressed

N
Nicola Loosley
1 year ago

This is not necessary, appropriate or beneficial to Scotland .

J
Janice Pratt
1 year ago

Far too much ruination of our countryside already.

J
Jean McHarg
1 year ago

Enough

A
Andrew Todd
1 year ago

We need to stop the ruination of what little unspoilt countryside we have left.

A
Andrew Cowburn
1 year ago

I wish to register my agreement with this objection