Skip to main content

Honey They Shrank Our Homes

21 Comments

J
Joseph
10 years ago

This must go through .. We need larger home - for large family .. Thank you so much ...

J
Jonathan Tessler
10 years ago

I also believe that the middle ground is the fair way to proceed.

K
Keyvan shahrouz
10 years ago

Please follow end the insanity

A
Aarons biston
10 years ago

I agree with this petition

D
David Bacall
10 years ago

This is very important to the future of LA

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Super important for our family.

B
Brian Ross
10 years ago

Crestview resident since 1987.

K
Karen Shagalow
10 years ago Featured

Crestview is a multicultural family community. Families grow and should be able to expand their homes. And live in peace..

A
avrohom margolis
10 years ago

am opposed to the proposed R1R2-RG re-zoning I am in favor of R1 R New zoning Imposing a detached garage is antiquated and unfair. If LADBS were to go door to door and inspect the usage of these detached garages they would find that nearly 100% are not used to park cars. They are illegal guest houses and offices or just used for storage. Most do not have covered parking to comply with the current regulation. Those who oppose to attached garages are opposed due to their own aesthetics. They should not be allowed to dictate the lifestyle preferences of others. A Max. FAR of .45 on smaller lots is a de facto prohibition on 2nd stories. The opponents to building are essentially hoping families will stay out of their neighborhoods or to preserve what they believe is what a family size should be. We are multi-generational households. We have married children with grandchildren who visit often and need to be able to accommodate the changing needs of our families. We want the option to have elderly parents live with us instead of putting them in old age homes. I purchased my home with the intention of expanding it in the future to meet the needs of my family. The purchase of my home has increased property value for everyone and added much needed funds in property taxes.

V
Vadim Kuraev
10 years ago Featured

I bought a house in order to make it lather on the future based in the code right now. It is not fair to change it on me

J
Jordan Rush
10 years ago

The restrictions are too constricting! This is unfair to families on many levels.

V
VladimirIlina Beron
10 years ago Featured

The restrictions that are proposed have nothing to do with the residents' complaints. The most common complaint is that the houses are big boxes that don't match the neighborhood and are too boxy. These issues can be addressed through better architectural design, ie fitting the neighborhood better as opposed to the modern minimalistic design. Don't punish everyone. If necessary, use architectural review to create more attractive homes.

J
Jonathan Dekel
10 years ago

I'm a Crestview resident and the proposed ordinance will severely damage our neighborhood, raise crime and be harmful to our children.

O
Ofer Hetsroni
10 years ago

Bad for families, bad for business, bad for future! Current restrictions are enough!!!

L
Lev Olkha
10 years ago

Proposed changes are too extreme.

D
David Mayman
10 years ago

Please don't limit the size of our homes more than they are already limited...

A
Anthony Krinsky
10 years ago Featured

FAR restrictions are hateful not helpful. The proposed requirement make second stories impractical in most cases. There are many ways to build a second story tastefully - that should be the focus of regulations.

J
jacob shallman
10 years ago

We live in america - people spend millions of dollars on the american dream only to have someone else decide what they can do with their mulit-million dollar dream home purchase? this is ridiculous

B
Baila Romm
10 years ago Featured

The proposed building restrictions is far to extreme and unfair. Must make a compromise. Young families should not be punished by those who want to keep our needs in step with their own, personal lifestyle requirements.

M
Michael Houske
10 years ago Featured

I find the justifications for changing the current restrictions to be arbitrary and without justification - keeping neighborhood charm is subjective and therefore arbitrary. As such, the restrictions are a taking under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. If the City of Los Angeles is going to take away my property rights for an arbitrary reason, then I, along with every property owner should be compensated for this government taking.