The city planning department officially backed down on the new FAR restrictions for our neighborhood. We fought for a balanced approach and won. Keep an eye on the upcoming zoning meetings so we can ensure these rules stay in place.
November 2, 2016
Final supporters
Los Angeles – Crestview and Faircrest Heights neighborhoods
Re: BMO – ICO - ReZoning
Att: Planning Dept. Planning Commission, Planning Deputies, PLUMM and Council members
Ladies and Gentlemen:
A portion of the Crestview neighborhood is presently regulated by the Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) implemented in March 2015 for an interim period of 2 years. The ICO limits Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.5 with no bonuses. We were just notified that City Planning is now trying to restrict R1 lots to a Maximum FAR ranging from .35-.45 and to impose a rear garage. This latest approach is alarming. Crestview is a neighborhood, not a winner-take-all battleground. It is imperative that we find a middle ground solution.
We, the undersigned petitioners, realize that the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (BMO) intends to bring a more balanced approach to real estate development in Los Angeles. We also recognize that residents have a right to quiet enjoyment of their residential properties. We do, however, find that the latest version of the draft has gone too far in its restrictions and that, if passed into code, would be disastrous to both the needs of families and to property values.
The frustration of some residents has caused an extremely negative attitude towards development in general. For lots smaller than 7,500 sq. ft., lowering the maximum FAR to .45 exceeds fairness and reason, and would exclude families from building homes that would meet even their minimum needs. Dissatisfaction with the disproportional size of some new homes in our neighborhood can by resolved simply by removing the 20% allowed bonus over the 0.5 maximum FAR.
Let us consider the example of an average Crestview lot of 5,600 sq. ft.; Under the old ordinance, this lot would have an allowable FAR of 3,360 sq. ft. + garage. Some residents became concerned. At 0.5 FAR without bonus, the same lot would have an allowable FAR of 2,800 sq. ft. + garage, by no means a “McMansion.” This would be a reasonable “middle ground” solution that would translate into a first floor footprint (including garage) of 1,800 to 2,000 sq. ft. The second floor would be 1,200 to 1,400 sq. ft. Such a structure would not have a disproportionate appearance and would allow for sunlight exposure to the adjacent lots.
At .45 FAR, however, the same lot would have an allowable total square footage of 2,520 sq. ft., essentially prohibiting two story homes by shrinking the size of the rooms to unreasonably small dimensions. The majority of families prefer having front attached garages for safety and convenience. Imposing rear garages in Crestview/ Faircrest Heights, as proposed by the Planning Commission would take away this much-needed option.
Also, please consider that homeowners who purchased in recent years did so at a market value based on the then prevailing codes and building/remodeling potential.
We respectfully request that our voices be heard in the strongest possible way to adopt a new code that is in line with the present ICO:
- Maximum FAR for lots less than 7,500 of 0.5. and 0.45 for lots above 7,500
- Garage exemption up to 400 sq. ft. regardless of location.
- Given the ample setback and the removal of the bonuses, no imposition of the 45- degree angle above 20 ft., as this would restrict architectural design options.
Submitted with petition signatures below.
Sincerely,
Crestview and Faicrest Heights residents for a reasonable solution
Updates
September 11, 2016
City officials are moving forward with these restrictive zoning drafts despite our clear objections to the proposed floor area ratios. Email your council representative today and demand they push for a balanced ordinance that respects our existing property values. We must keep the pressure on until they agree to sit down and negotiate a middle ground.
September 11, 2016
We hit our stride and the Planning Department is finally starting to pay attention. Email your council representative today to tell them that these restrictions undermine our local families. Post this link on your neighborhood Facebook group so we keep building this momentum.
Reached 100 supporters
September 11, 2016
21 Comments
I bought a house in order to make it lather on the future based in the code right now. It is not fair to change it on me
The restrictions that are proposed have nothing to do with the residents' complaints. The most common complaint is that the houses are big boxes that don't match the neighborhood and are too boxy. These issues can be addressed through better architectural design, ie fitting the neighborhood better as opposed to the modern minimalistic design. Don't punish everyone. If necessary, use architectural review to create more attractive homes.
FAR restrictions are hateful not helpful. The proposed requirement make second stories impractical in most cases. There are many ways to build a second story tastefully - that should be the focus of regulations.
The proposed building restrictions is far to extreme and unfair. Must make a compromise. Young families should not be punished by those who want to keep our needs in step with their own, personal lifestyle requirements.
I find the justifications for changing the current restrictions to be arbitrary and without justification - keeping neighborhood charm is subjective and therefore arbitrary. As such, the restrictions are a taking under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. If the City of Los Angeles is going to take away my property rights for an arbitrary reason, then I, along with every property owner should be compensated for this government taking.
This must go through .. We need larger home - for large family .. Thank you so much ...
I also believe that the middle ground is the fair way to proceed.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
The city planning department officially backed down on the new FAR restrictions for our neighborhood. We fought for a balanced approach and won. Keep an eye on the upcoming zoning meetings so we can ensure these rules stay in place.
November 2, 2016
Final supporters
Los Angeles – Crestview and Faircrest Heights neighborhoods
Re: BMO – ICO - ReZoning
Att: Planning Dept. Planning Commission, Planning Deputies, PLUMM and Council members
Ladies and Gentlemen:
A portion of the Crestview neighborhood is presently regulated by the Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) implemented in March 2015 for an interim period of 2 years. The ICO limits Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.5 with no bonuses. We were just notified that City Planning is now trying to restrict R1 lots to a Maximum FAR ranging from .35-.45 and to impose a rear garage. This latest approach is alarming. Crestview is a neighborhood, not a winner-take-all battleground. It is imperative that we find a middle ground solution.
We, the undersigned petitioners, realize that the Baseline Mansionization Ordinance (BMO) intends to bring a more balanced approach to real estate development in Los Angeles. We also recognize that residents have a right to quiet enjoyment of their residential properties. We do, however, find that the latest version of the draft has gone too far in its restrictions and that, if passed into code, would be disastrous to both the needs of families and to property values.
The frustration of some residents has caused an extremely negative attitude towards development in general. For lots smaller than 7,500 sq. ft., lowering the maximum FAR to .45 exceeds fairness and reason, and would exclude families from building homes that would meet even their minimum needs. Dissatisfaction with the disproportional size of some new homes in our neighborhood can by resolved simply by removing the 20% allowed bonus over the 0.5 maximum FAR.
Let us consider the example of an average Crestview lot of 5,600 sq. ft.; Under the old ordinance, this lot would have an allowable FAR of 3,360 sq. ft. + garage. Some residents became concerned. At 0.5 FAR without bonus, the same lot would have an allowable FAR of 2,800 sq. ft. + garage, by no means a “McMansion.” This would be a reasonable “middle ground” solution that would translate into a first floor footprint (including garage) of 1,800 to 2,000 sq. ft. The second floor would be 1,200 to 1,400 sq. ft. Such a structure would not have a disproportionate appearance and would allow for sunlight exposure to the adjacent lots.
At .45 FAR, however, the same lot would have an allowable total square footage of 2,520 sq. ft., essentially prohibiting two story homes by shrinking the size of the rooms to unreasonably small dimensions. The majority of families prefer having front attached garages for safety and convenience. Imposing rear garages in Crestview/ Faircrest Heights, as proposed by the Planning Commission would take away this much-needed option.
Also, please consider that homeowners who purchased in recent years did so at a market value based on the then prevailing codes and building/remodeling potential.
We respectfully request that our voices be heard in the strongest possible way to adopt a new code that is in line with the present ICO:
- Maximum FAR for lots less than 7,500 of 0.5. and 0.45 for lots above 7,500
- Garage exemption up to 400 sq. ft. regardless of location.
- Given the ample setback and the removal of the bonuses, no imposition of the 45- degree angle above 20 ft., as this would restrict architectural design options.
Submitted with petition signatures below.
Sincerely,
Crestview and Faicrest Heights residents for a reasonable solution
Updates
September 11, 2016
City officials are moving forward with these restrictive zoning drafts despite our clear objections to the proposed floor area ratios. Email your council representative today and demand they push for a balanced ordinance that respects our existing property values. We must keep the pressure on until they agree to sit down and negotiate a middle ground.
September 11, 2016
We hit our stride and the Planning Department is finally starting to pay attention. Email your council representative today to tell them that these restrictions undermine our local families. Post this link on your neighborhood Facebook group so we keep building this momentum.
Reached 100 supporters
September 11, 2016
21 Comments
Crestview is a multicultural family community. Families grow and should be able to expand their homes. And live in peace..
I bought a house in order to make it lather on the future based in the code right now. It is not fair to change it on me
The restrictions that are proposed have nothing to do with the residents' complaints. The most common complaint is that the houses are big boxes that don't match the neighborhood and are too boxy. These issues can be addressed through better architectural design, ie fitting the neighborhood better as opposed to the modern minimalistic design. Don't punish everyone. If necessary, use architectural review to create more attractive homes.
FAR restrictions are hateful not helpful. The proposed requirement make second stories impractical in most cases. There are many ways to build a second story tastefully - that should be the focus of regulations.
The proposed building restrictions is far to extreme and unfair. Must make a compromise. Young families should not be punished by those who want to keep our needs in step with their own, personal lifestyle requirements.
I find the justifications for changing the current restrictions to be arbitrary and without justification - keeping neighborhood charm is subjective and therefore arbitrary. As such, the restrictions are a taking under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. If the City of Los Angeles is going to take away my property rights for an arbitrary reason, then I, along with every property owner should be compensated for this government taking.
This must go through .. We need larger home - for large family .. Thank you so much ...
I also believe that the middle ground is the fair way to proceed.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Crestview is a multicultural family community. Families grow and should be able to expand their homes. And live in peace..