Hold Public Meetings on Scarsdale Surveillance System
93 Comments
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
We need an open and honest discussion before any implementation.
M
Michael Otten
1 year ago
I would include the installation of cameras around the village in general. We saw the # in other communities, but # or placement planned in Scarsdale. In this day and age, it is not enough to protect the collected data except when requested by law enforcement. Given the history of enemies lists and abuse of power by the Executive Branch of Government, our only protection of privacy is for certain kinds of surveillance information not to exist.
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
We need an open and honest discussion before any implementation. Where is the funding coming from and who approved the spending?
D
Dana Crane
1 year ago
I’m ok with having license plates being captured on and off the highways and maybe in and out of our main roads like mamaroneck and post but I’m not a fan of having drones watch us like China.
B
Bernard and Jeannie Mackler
1 year ago
Yes we are very concerned that the Scarsdale and BOT have been so secretive about the surveillance project
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
1984
P
Phyllis
1 year ago
I want my opinion to count. This is not something we want
C
Christa Skoupy
1 year ago
NO
A
Albina Hussain
1 year ago
This is not okay.
B
Brian Rosenthal
1 year ago
I'm very concerned that the government will mis-use this information.
N
Nancy Lang Adler
1 year ago
A hard- don’t
M
Marilyn Hahn
1 year ago
We need to know more. Period!!!!
J
Joyce Hirsch
1 year ago
It's unconscionable entering into this intrusive contract without a FULL and THOROUGH discussion within the community
A
Archana Parikh
1 year ago
Encroach on our freedom
F
Frank Murtha
1 year ago
This is too much. It is also the sort of thing that should be discussed by the community beforehand.
K
Kim Greene-Liebowitz
1 year ago
I find the idea of being under surveillance absolutely chilling and totalitarian in nature. I would not consent to this and my guess is that it is a fourth amendment violation.
E
Elisa Ramos
1 year ago
I don’t want surveillance vigilance in Scarsdale.
J
Jennifer S Fischman
1 year ago
Featured
Recognizing that such a system could be useful in public safety, I share the concern that a robust public dialogue did not occur before a vote on its implementation. I agree that further dialogue and engagement should take place to alleviate the concerns expressed by Village residents.
C
Camille and John Roche
1 year ago
We need an open and honest discussion before any implementation
B
Bob Selvaggio
1 year ago
This is another frightening step toward a surveillance society, the type that many of our residents from the PRC and elsewhere fled in order to enjoy our freedoms. All freedom-loving people will be a hard "no" on this one. This is what happens when few show up to vote or choose to run in Village Elections.
We need an open and honest discussion before any implementation.
I would include the installation of cameras around the village in general. We saw the # in other communities, but # or placement planned in Scarsdale. In this day and age, it is not enough to protect the collected data except when requested by law enforcement. Given the history of enemies lists and abuse of power by the Executive Branch of Government, our only protection of privacy is for certain kinds of surveillance information not to exist.
We need an open and honest discussion before any implementation. Where is the funding coming from and who approved the spending?
I’m ok with having license plates being captured on and off the highways and maybe in and out of our main roads like mamaroneck and post but I’m not a fan of having drones watch us like China.
Yes we are very concerned that the Scarsdale and BOT have been so secretive about the surveillance project
1984
I want my opinion to count. This is not something we want
NO
This is not okay.
I'm very concerned that the government will mis-use this information.
A hard- don’t
We need to know more. Period!!!!
It's unconscionable entering into this intrusive contract without a FULL and THOROUGH discussion within the community
Encroach on our freedom
This is too much. It is also the sort of thing that should be discussed by the community beforehand.
I find the idea of being under surveillance absolutely chilling and totalitarian in nature. I would not consent to this and my guess is that it is a fourth amendment violation.
I don’t want surveillance vigilance in Scarsdale.
Recognizing that such a system could be useful in public safety, I share the concern that a robust public dialogue did not occur before a vote on its implementation. I agree that further dialogue and engagement should take place to alleviate the concerns expressed by Village residents.
We need an open and honest discussion before any implementation
This is another frightening step toward a surveillance society, the type that many of our residents from the PRC and elsewhere fled in order to enjoy our freedoms. All freedom-loving people will be a hard "no" on this one. This is what happens when few show up to vote or choose to run in Village Elections.