Skip to main content

Help us stop the townhouse development at 173-177 Dundas St

39 Comments

S
Sylvia Dawe
2 years ago

Melissa cr

C
Courtney Crosbie
2 years ago

157 Rockcliffe Rd

A
Amy Excell
2 years ago Featured

We are strongly opposed to this townhouse development for all the reasons stated above. The Dundas/Riley intersection is a nightmare already! Scott Street resident

E
Ed Johnston
2 years ago

Fully disagree with the proposed townhouse plan due to its multiple negative effects on the neighborhood.

M
Michele Adams
2 years ago

I strongly object to this proposed development. This will have a great negative impact on the surrounding homes and traffic a. Safety to pedestrians and cars in the area will be jeapardized.

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

We do not need anymore traffic in our neighbourhoods

S
Susan Clark
2 years ago Featured

I am apposed to this proposal as the development in this area is too dense, will severely affect the already overloaded traffic in the area, and is affecting the migration of birds from the Niagara Escarpment. This development in Waterdown has got to stop. It's no longer a Village, it's a town quickly becoming a city and this is not why I moved here.

S
Susan Somers
2 years ago

A very unsuitable development

K
Kim Peggie
2 years ago

22 Scott St. Waterdown, ON

B
Brian Peggie
2 years ago

I have shown my concerns over the previous years and continue to feel this is an unnecessary location for more townhouses and also unsafe due to traffic concerns This is only a grab for a developer to make money without concerns for existing long term residents

B
Bruce
2 years ago

Kids crossing, very unsafe and they will be parking on our lovely streets. Great. Why do these politicians not understand all the terrible issues?

S
Scott Smith
2 years ago

Dundas is the main Street going through waterdown and our town is being affected by traffic. Sticking a new development will add significantly more traffic, on top of the proposed development being at a dangerous area for drivers right at a traffic light. We are already overpopulated and these new developments need to stop.

N
Nancy
2 years ago

Anyone who says yes to this build will be responsible for a horrible accident or even death on this area of Dundas St. This is absolutely absurd.

K
Kellie WELLENREITER
2 years ago

Stop the proposed 18 unit townhouse development at 173 and 177 Dundas St E.

C
Chris Stewart
2 years ago Featured

I strongly appose this development for all the reasons listed here. The size of the building will be an eyesore amongst all the original homes. The added traffic to side streets and Dundas St. will make an already hectic street even worse.

J
Janice Cromarty
2 years ago

This project has many issues. It is not acceptable as part of the current zoning, major traffic problems, more important the water runoff is a huge consideration along with loss of quiet enjoyment of existing residents. . Well this project needs to be considered unacceptable as currently presented.

L
Lily King
2 years ago

I oppose the proposed townhomes, as eighteen units on what was originally two lots is congestion at its finest. Not only would this be an eyesore and take away from the residential area appearance, it is a traffic risk in an already overly congested area and unsafe intersection (Dundas and Riley). The fact that any of this was approved by anyone is ridiculous. Observing traffic conditions for 15 minutes would demonstrate major traffic concerns. The established homes in the area also deserve to have some semblance of privacy to continue and 18 units zoned here would destroy that, and threaten home values in the area.

K
Kathleen Walsh
2 years ago Featured

100% I oppose this! I am a resident and the intersection of Dundas and Riley is already a huge traffic problem, with nonstop red-light runners endangering pedestrians and other cars multiple times a day. Current homeowners deserve lot privacy, and less congestion and danger, not more. 18 units on originally 2 lots is merely a tax grab, and an eyesore. Absolutely ridiculous.

C
Curth Martell
2 years ago

The reasons for opposing this proposal by the applicant are numerous and well founded, pointing out how unnecessary it is, and the potential dangers that may result. We continue to strenuously oppose the application.