The policy is officially reversed. We won because you refused to stay silent.
June 24, 2017
Final supporters
Recently, we were notified of the new Hall Allocation Policies.
Many questions were raised, but none of them were answered. This Petition aims for reconsideration of the new policy and the reasons are below.
- Introduction
Non-local students are a minority in the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST). Around 35% of the University students are non-local, as of December 2016 (source: http://www.ust.hk/about-hkust/hkust-at-a-glance/facts-figures/), and this is a big number compared to other Hong Kong Universities. Internationalization is extremely important for the University, and this fact raises several problems with the new Hall Policy. By eliminating non-local students from the Residential Life, the campus loses its diversity and therefore, leads to the loss in international students in the future. Within the current changes, less and less UG students around the world will consider HKUST as a top-priority education establishment.
This problem has existed elsewhere for some time, and some countries have found successful solutions dealing with diversity problems. Take for example the United States of America, not only do US establishments have Presidents for Diversity and their special advisors (source: http://www.vermontbiz.com/news/april/champlain-college-appoints-special-adviser-president-diversity-and-inclusion), but they also understand the importance of the internationalization and attraction of people from different countries and cultures.
Such issues should not be neglected, and furthermore, should be diminished. However, the new hall policy magnifies these problems and may lead to the unfavorable consequences.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Let’s go through the new policies.
- Diversity
It was said that by not providing halls to non-local students in year 3 and 4 the diversity in halls will be increased. This statement seems absurd since non-local students are of different nationalities, and substituting them with local students not only will decrease the diversity of residential life, but will also increase the existing language barrier between local and non-local students.
- Imbalance and Expectations
It was stated in the video that the 1 to 1 correlation between local and non-local students living on campus is imbalanced. Furthermore, the new policy raises the expectations from non-local students to rent apartments and rooms outside of campus in year 3 and 4.
It should be said firstly that if a non-local student is not given a hall, they are forced to spend an excessive amount of money for off-campus residence, whereas local students are not obliged to do that since they have homes in Hong Kong. Secondly, non-local students come from various countries that are often 5, 10, or 15 thousand of kilometers away from Hong Kong, and none of them have families or homes here.
- Decision Process
The Office of the Dean of Students based their decisions on information from societies such as MSSS, SU, and ISA in order to make their conclusions. Let’s go through those societies.
1. MSSS:
Since the site doesn't have an English version and all the names of representative are written in Chinese, there are no international representative in MSSS.
The executive committee consists fully of Chinese students, meaning that the opinion of non-local students was neglected in this society.
2. HKUSTSU
The situation in HKUSTSU is similar to MSSS, since the vast majority of students are local.
3.ISA
Almost none of the international students know what points were mentioned to ISA representatives and in what way.
- Choice of students
The group of representatives that were chosen were not balanced, and a big number of non-local students are not in agreement with the conclusions of the new hall policies.
- New non-local students will be considered as local students with TT<90 min in their year 3 and year 4.
This was stated in the video with the argument that non-local students are expected to rent apartments in the TKO, Diamond Hill, or Choi Hung areas. Thus, this decision was made on the basis of this exact new policy. In other words, this conclusion was looped in with other new policy conclusions.
Such a decision did not take into consideration the fact that non-local students do not have homes in Hong Kong, and these changes will force non-local students to leave campus after 2 years. It is important to understand that whereas local students have 3 choices of living (home, campus, renting), non-local students have only two. Further, they are substituting international students with local students under the slogan of diversity which is a misleading justification that does not represent what is actually happening.
BRIEF CONCLUSION:
1. Misleading statements about diversity.
2. Controversial decision of considering non-local students as local students with TT<90 min in their year 3 and year 4.
3. Absence of consideration that non-local students do not have the chance or choice to live at home in Hong Kong.
4. Finally, irrational consideration of student travel logistics.
It is not a secret that hall allocation is a great problem here, in the HKUST. It is also well-known that there are plenty more problems with internationalization and communication barriers.
However, the new policy does not solve any of those problems. In fact, it will increase the language barrier, decrease the diversity of residential lives, and rapidly expand the communication gap between local and non-local students.
SOLUTIONS: Suspend the new hall policy until…
1. The needs of the students are better represented by thorough consideration of student travel and residency logistics
2. The policy better accounts for the difference between local and non-local students and their housing options in Hong Kong.
3. The pursuit of diversity is better accomplished with policies that encourage more international students to attend HKUST, instead of a policy that hinders their attendance.
The announced policy is just another extreme after the previous one. Whereas earlier it was hard for local students to get on-campus accommodation, now it is simply opposite.
It’s important that HKUST satisfies the housing needs of all the students in a manner that makes sense for each of individual situations, and solves the problem on an urgency-of-need basis.
Updates
April 20, 2017
The silence from the administration is deafening. I am currently reaching out to student representatives to force an open dialogue.
Reached 100 supporters
April 20, 2017
22 Comments
It was a totally absurd and hasty decision. I already pay 120,000 hkd per annum just for tuition fees. Local students pay only $40,000 per annum. If you are displacing non-local students, you are putting us under more financial pressure. Your reasons such as non-local student need to adjust to HK culture makes no sense. How exactly does that help me adjust to HK culture? I don't even want to work in HK, you can't just assume I am going to be working in HK. Be prepared to lose a lot of incoming international students with your change in policy.
It is not fair for international students as one of the goals for HKUST is diversification. If the number of international students is reduced for increasing the quota for local students, it is against its own value. Furthermore, we have agreed to pay more for the accommodation inside HKUST compared with local. It would be more reasonable if HKUST make the hall fees the same for all students if they want to deploy this policy.
Why should year 1s get full year when uteams have to commute everyday for training, which by the way is for the University.
I am a 1 year exchange student in my 3rd year. I would not have come to HKUST if I were not offered a place in halls. I believe that by doing this, HKUST will limit the number of exchange students studying here
The new policy definitely is a significant negative for non local students - UST should be prepared to lose out the international diversity it prides itself on to the other universities in HK and around the world.
Wow this is messed up, why would they do this?
Diversification of halls can not be improved with more local students but less internationals and mainland students. School can not be better by encouraging students to join more activities but study less.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
The policy is officially reversed. We won because you refused to stay silent.
June 24, 2017
Final supporters
Recently, we were notified of the new Hall Allocation Policies.
Many questions were raised, but none of them were answered. This Petition aims for reconsideration of the new policy and the reasons are below.
- Introduction
Non-local students are a minority in the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST). Around 35% of the University students are non-local, as of December 2016 (source: http://www.ust.hk/about-hkust/hkust-at-a-glance/facts-figures/), and this is a big number compared to other Hong Kong Universities. Internationalization is extremely important for the University, and this fact raises several problems with the new Hall Policy. By eliminating non-local students from the Residential Life, the campus loses its diversity and therefore, leads to the loss in international students in the future. Within the current changes, less and less UG students around the world will consider HKUST as a top-priority education establishment.
This problem has existed elsewhere for some time, and some countries have found successful solutions dealing with diversity problems. Take for example the United States of America, not only do US establishments have Presidents for Diversity and their special advisors (source: http://www.vermontbiz.com/news/april/champlain-college-appoints-special-adviser-president-diversity-and-inclusion), but they also understand the importance of the internationalization and attraction of people from different countries and cultures.
Such issues should not be neglected, and furthermore, should be diminished. However, the new hall policy magnifies these problems and may lead to the unfavorable consequences.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Let’s go through the new policies.
- Diversity
It was said that by not providing halls to non-local students in year 3 and 4 the diversity in halls will be increased. This statement seems absurd since non-local students are of different nationalities, and substituting them with local students not only will decrease the diversity of residential life, but will also increase the existing language barrier between local and non-local students.
- Imbalance and Expectations
It was stated in the video that the 1 to 1 correlation between local and non-local students living on campus is imbalanced. Furthermore, the new policy raises the expectations from non-local students to rent apartments and rooms outside of campus in year 3 and 4.
It should be said firstly that if a non-local student is not given a hall, they are forced to spend an excessive amount of money for off-campus residence, whereas local students are not obliged to do that since they have homes in Hong Kong. Secondly, non-local students come from various countries that are often 5, 10, or 15 thousand of kilometers away from Hong Kong, and none of them have families or homes here.
- Decision Process
The Office of the Dean of Students based their decisions on information from societies such as MSSS, SU, and ISA in order to make their conclusions. Let’s go through those societies.
1. MSSS:
Since the site doesn't have an English version and all the names of representative are written in Chinese, there are no international representative in MSSS.
The executive committee consists fully of Chinese students, meaning that the opinion of non-local students was neglected in this society.
2. HKUSTSU
The situation in HKUSTSU is similar to MSSS, since the vast majority of students are local.
3.ISA
Almost none of the international students know what points were mentioned to ISA representatives and in what way.
- Choice of students
The group of representatives that were chosen were not balanced, and a big number of non-local students are not in agreement with the conclusions of the new hall policies.
- New non-local students will be considered as local students with TT<90 min in their year 3 and year 4.
This was stated in the video with the argument that non-local students are expected to rent apartments in the TKO, Diamond Hill, or Choi Hung areas. Thus, this decision was made on the basis of this exact new policy. In other words, this conclusion was looped in with other new policy conclusions.
Such a decision did not take into consideration the fact that non-local students do not have homes in Hong Kong, and these changes will force non-local students to leave campus after 2 years. It is important to understand that whereas local students have 3 choices of living (home, campus, renting), non-local students have only two. Further, they are substituting international students with local students under the slogan of diversity which is a misleading justification that does not represent what is actually happening.
BRIEF CONCLUSION:
1. Misleading statements about diversity.
2. Controversial decision of considering non-local students as local students with TT<90 min in their year 3 and year 4.
3. Absence of consideration that non-local students do not have the chance or choice to live at home in Hong Kong.
4. Finally, irrational consideration of student travel logistics.
It is not a secret that hall allocation is a great problem here, in the HKUST. It is also well-known that there are plenty more problems with internationalization and communication barriers.
However, the new policy does not solve any of those problems. In fact, it will increase the language barrier, decrease the diversity of residential lives, and rapidly expand the communication gap between local and non-local students.
SOLUTIONS: Suspend the new hall policy until…
1. The needs of the students are better represented by thorough consideration of student travel and residency logistics
2. The policy better accounts for the difference between local and non-local students and their housing options in Hong Kong.
3. The pursuit of diversity is better accomplished with policies that encourage more international students to attend HKUST, instead of a policy that hinders their attendance.
The announced policy is just another extreme after the previous one. Whereas earlier it was hard for local students to get on-campus accommodation, now it is simply opposite.
It’s important that HKUST satisfies the housing needs of all the students in a manner that makes sense for each of individual situations, and solves the problem on an urgency-of-need basis.
Updates
April 20, 2017
The silence from the administration is deafening. I am currently reaching out to student representatives to force an open dialogue.
Reached 100 supporters
April 20, 2017
22 Comments
Students needs should be the priority, and international students have a greater need for on-campus housing than local HK students that already live within a short commute of campus. It's also important to preserve the international diversity present in halls at HKUST. Students need to live in contact with other students from around the world to facilitate the transition to a global culture, and humanistic empathy across country's borders.
It was a totally absurd and hasty decision. I already pay 120,000 hkd per annum just for tuition fees. Local students pay only $40,000 per annum. If you are displacing non-local students, you are putting us under more financial pressure. Your reasons such as non-local student need to adjust to HK culture makes no sense. How exactly does that help me adjust to HK culture? I don't even want to work in HK, you can't just assume I am going to be working in HK. Be prepared to lose a lot of incoming international students with your change in policy.
It is not fair for international students as one of the goals for HKUST is diversification. If the number of international students is reduced for increasing the quota for local students, it is against its own value. Furthermore, we have agreed to pay more for the accommodation inside HKUST compared with local. It would be more reasonable if HKUST make the hall fees the same for all students if they want to deploy this policy.
Why should year 1s get full year when uteams have to commute everyday for training, which by the way is for the University.
I am a 1 year exchange student in my 3rd year. I would not have come to HKUST if I were not offered a place in halls. I believe that by doing this, HKUST will limit the number of exchange students studying here
The new policy definitely is a significant negative for non local students - UST should be prepared to lose out the international diversity it prides itself on to the other universities in HK and around the world.
Wow this is messed up, why would they do this?
Diversification of halls can not be improved with more local students but less internationals and mainland students. School can not be better by encouraging students to join more activities but study less.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Students needs should be the priority, and international students have a greater need for on-campus housing than local HK students that already live within a short commute of campus. It's also important to preserve the international diversity present in halls at HKUST. Students need to live in contact with other students from around the world to facilitate the transition to a global culture, and humanistic empathy across country's borders.