To whom it may concern:
In the past five
years, Georgia Southern University’s Child Development Center (CDC) has
advanced children based on developmental ability. In March of 2015, children
had started to transition to the next class up, and parents who had been on the
waiting list for the infant room had been contacted to be informed that their
child would be starting in the Infant Room the same month. Transitions were
halted until the new director of the CDC had started employment here, and did
not continue once she began to work here. At the Parents Advisory Committee (PAC)
meeting on Thursday, March 26, 2015, it was stated that this policy would be
changing. Instead of children advancing when developmentally appropriate, they
would now be advancing as a cohort each August. This information was disseminated
through word of mouth.
While this is a good
practice for children who are of school-age, this is not appropriate for
children aged newborn-4 whose cognitive and motor skill development advances so
rapidly. It is detrimental for children who just miss the August cut-off, as
well as children who are born just before the cutoff of the following year, to
be in the same class. Additionally, allowing admission once per year historically
has not provided adequate enrollment and hence funding to support the educators
and facilities that are necessary to keep the CDC functioning as a lab for
Early Childhood Education students.
As
parents of children who attend the CDC, we are concerned that this change in
policy will negatively affect our children, as well as the financial situation
of the CDC. We believe that if one of the concerns regarding mid-semester
advancement is the use of the CDC as a lab for Early Childhood Education
Majors, an ideal change to the policy would be to transition children just
before the beginning of each semester, in January, May, and August. This would
eliminate the concern regarding lab students being assigned a child who would
transition mid-semester, as well as maintenance of a full facility each
semester.
We,
the undersigned, propose the following actions be taken:
·
Transitioning
of children who were to move up in March of 2015 is resumed immediately.
·
When
a change in policy is to take place, a memorandum be sent to all parents one
month in advance, so that parents may have adequate time to voice concerns and
proper considerations be discussed before the policy change is implemented.
· Advancement continues to occur at a developmentally appropriate time.
OR
· Advancement occurs at the beginning of each semester, three times per year.
my son is already bored and ready to move up. keeping him held back just because of a birthday cutoff makes no sense for his development