School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences GeoCorner Undergraduate Lounge: Support Petition
On the School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences Undergraduate Lounge:
As the users of the School of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences (SE3) undergraduate lounge in GeoCorner, we are concerned about the recently proposed changes to the space. We recognize the Educational Initiatives team’s recent growth necessitates additional space but nevertheless question the viability of the prospective solution. Given that room 112 is inadequate for the four members of the Educational Initiatives team, we are hesitant to believe that it could replace the functionality of the current lounge. As first-hand witnesses to the quantity and diversity of students it supports, we believe we can clarify misperceptions about lounge usage and offer key insight into the lounge’s role as a student center for socializing and academic study within SE3. We would like to engage in a conversation about how these renovations can best serve not only the interests of the Dean’s Office but also those of our community, so that the new lounge does not compromise the functionality of the current one. To begin this conversation, this letter outlines undergraduate usage of the lounge - through discussion of (1) the users of the lounge, (2) the times at which the lounge in used, and (3) the uses of the lounge - in order to demonstrate its central role in the SE3 community.
INTRODUCTION TO LOUNGE USAGE
Lounge Users
Perhaps the primary misconception regarding lounge usage is that the majority of lounge users are Geological Sciences (GS) majors; that is far from the truth, as GS majors make up fewer than 50% of lounge users (see Figure 2). We were therefore disappointed that, when lounge users were supposed to be notified of changes to the lounge space on September 12th, only GS undergraduates were emailed. In reality, a variety of students utilize the space, including SE3 majors and minors, Stanford Earth Summer Undergraduate Research (SESUR) program participants and students with auxiliary interests in SE3 (see Figures 1-3).
The central location of the lounge within GeoCorner promotes interactions between these different categories of students because it directly connects the lobby, and therefore current and prospective SE3 students, staff, and faculty entering the building, and students using the lounge. In fact, we've experienced several cases wherein non-affiliated students have wandered into the lounge to inquire about SE3 majors and departmental activities before or after classes or meetings in GeoCorner.
Timing of Lounge Usage
Post-business hours usage is not observed by administrators and so may be easily overlooked; however, it is critically important to undergraduates and makes up a significant portion of weekly utilization of the lounge. Outside of normal business hours, students use the space to complete laboratory assignments together, to discuss problem sets, and to finalize charts and figures for research posters. Teaching assistants take advantage of this access by offering additional late-night office hours in the lounge, complementing students’ schedules. To demonstrate lounge usage, we asked lounge users to record their time in the lounge over a one week interval beginning on the evening of Monday, October 10 and ending on the evening of Monday, October 17 (see Table 4 and Figures 1-4). The results indicate usage between 8PM and 2AM accounts for a substantial portion of the usage throughout the week (see Figure 4).
Lounge Uses
In addition to being an informal study space, the lounge serves a variety of social and academic purposes. It acts as a space for course-related meetings(e.g. office hours, see Table 1) as well as non-course activities and engagements (see Table 3).
NECESSARY FEATURES OF THE UNDERGRADUATE SPACE
Our primary motivation in writing this letter is to assure that the new lounge space allows for the same community and academic benefits as the current lounge does. In this spirit, we have compiled a list of key features and resources that reflect our conception of an effective community space (see Table 2). This list equally represents the most crucial benefits of the current lounge configuration.
Within this table, we would like to highlight two key components. The first is 24/7 access. For many students in SE3, the lounge is a second home and safe place for work and escape from busier parts of campus such as libraries and dorms. Secondly, academic resources are vital to the lounge. The drafting tables in the middle of the room allow students to spread out maps, work, and samples - a unique necessity to earth science programs wherein class projects often involve large topographical maps and cross-sections. For example, GS 55Q requires students to meet in groups and create a cross-section of California. Additionally, computers with ArcGIS, as well as other necessary programs (Matlab, Adobe Creative Suite, R, etc.), are needed for classes and research projects (see Table 2 for a comprehensive list).
CONCLUSION
As the users of the SE3 Undergraduate Lounge, we believe that strengthening lines of communication between lounge users and SE3 administrators is the best way to move forward. This letter aims to dispel a number of possible misconceptions about lounge usage. Firstly, lounge users are not primarily GS majors; rather, fewer than 50% of lounge users are GS undergraduate students (Figure 2). Secondly, time spent in the lounge outside of observed business hours is easily underestimated and accounts for a substantial portion of overall lounge usage (Figure 4). We worry that these misunderstandings may have contributed to the decision to change the lounge space. We hope that, by clarifying these misconceptions and delineating necessary lounge features, we will be able to find a compromise that meets the needs of both the Educational Initiatives team and the lounge users. For us, this means preserving the current essential features of the lounge.
FULL LETTER WITH FIGURES AND TABLES: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6D86s9-0l45U2hTM...
Updates
October 28, 2016
I have submitted a formal request for a meeting with the School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences leadership to present the data we collected on lounge usage. We are currently preparing a comprehensive briefing document that outlines why the proposed relocation is insufficient for student needs. Expect a summary of their response after our scheduled consultation.
29 Comments
Many students use the lounge most frequently outside of business hours (aka studying at night), so the amount of use that administrators see day-to-day is far less than it's actual use. Students love having this space. Why take it away?
An undergraduate work and socialization space is an important feature in most geoscience programs, and it should not be located within or adjacent to university administration offices. Our administration exists to further Stanford's educational and research missions. It's hard to see how expanding administrative office space at the expense of undergraduate facilities serves our students or research.
I agree with all the comments the students are making. I'd add that it is very well-used space, with students there at all hours. As a faculty member with an office in that building, it makes me smile every time I walk by there and see our students hard at work, and enjoying each others' company. As an advisor of a number of undergrad SESUR projects, it is really handy to know that if I drop by the lounge, I've got a good chance of finding my advisee there to talk to about our research together.
Over the last 5 years I have served as a TA for numerous undergraduate classes in the School (see below). The undergraduate lounge provides one of the only places for students to work collaboratively and to hold office hours. When I was an undergraduate the undergraduate lounge was the primary way that I met and interacted with other undergraduates, graduate students and Professors, and was a focal point for creating identity among the SE3 community. Daniel Ibarra BS GES '12, MS GES '13, PhD Candidate ESS TA for: GS 55Q, GS 150, Geophys 199, GS/ESS 12SC, ESS/EarthSys 146A
This lounge is where I have spent my toughest moments at Stanford and I don't think I could have made it through without a place to come and a community to be with. Having a smaller lounge with more people would take away all the best things about the geo lounge. If the school wants more of a community in geo corner, more people should be encouraged to be in the lounge as it is before the administration decides to lessen space.
This isn't just a space used by undergrads, its used by graduate students, faculty and staff in the whole department and School.
I fully support the petition by SE3 undergraduate students and hope that the Dean's Office can find a suitable alternative space for the Dean's Office staff.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences GeoCorner Undergraduate Lounge: Support Petition
On the School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences Undergraduate Lounge:
As the users of the School of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences (SE3) undergraduate lounge in GeoCorner, we are concerned about the recently proposed changes to the space. We recognize the Educational Initiatives team’s recent growth necessitates additional space but nevertheless question the viability of the prospective solution. Given that room 112 is inadequate for the four members of the Educational Initiatives team, we are hesitant to believe that it could replace the functionality of the current lounge. As first-hand witnesses to the quantity and diversity of students it supports, we believe we can clarify misperceptions about lounge usage and offer key insight into the lounge’s role as a student center for socializing and academic study within SE3. We would like to engage in a conversation about how these renovations can best serve not only the interests of the Dean’s Office but also those of our community, so that the new lounge does not compromise the functionality of the current one. To begin this conversation, this letter outlines undergraduate usage of the lounge - through discussion of (1) the users of the lounge, (2) the times at which the lounge in used, and (3) the uses of the lounge - in order to demonstrate its central role in the SE3 community.
INTRODUCTION TO LOUNGE USAGE
Lounge Users
Perhaps the primary misconception regarding lounge usage is that the majority of lounge users are Geological Sciences (GS) majors; that is far from the truth, as GS majors make up fewer than 50% of lounge users (see Figure 2). We were therefore disappointed that, when lounge users were supposed to be notified of changes to the lounge space on September 12th, only GS undergraduates were emailed. In reality, a variety of students utilize the space, including SE3 majors and minors, Stanford Earth Summer Undergraduate Research (SESUR) program participants and students with auxiliary interests in SE3 (see Figures 1-3).
The central location of the lounge within GeoCorner promotes interactions between these different categories of students because it directly connects the lobby, and therefore current and prospective SE3 students, staff, and faculty entering the building, and students using the lounge. In fact, we've experienced several cases wherein non-affiliated students have wandered into the lounge to inquire about SE3 majors and departmental activities before or after classes or meetings in GeoCorner.
Timing of Lounge Usage
Post-business hours usage is not observed by administrators and so may be easily overlooked; however, it is critically important to undergraduates and makes up a significant portion of weekly utilization of the lounge. Outside of normal business hours, students use the space to complete laboratory assignments together, to discuss problem sets, and to finalize charts and figures for research posters. Teaching assistants take advantage of this access by offering additional late-night office hours in the lounge, complementing students’ schedules. To demonstrate lounge usage, we asked lounge users to record their time in the lounge over a one week interval beginning on the evening of Monday, October 10 and ending on the evening of Monday, October 17 (see Table 4 and Figures 1-4). The results indicate usage between 8PM and 2AM accounts for a substantial portion of the usage throughout the week (see Figure 4).
Lounge Uses
In addition to being an informal study space, the lounge serves a variety of social and academic purposes. It acts as a space for course-related meetings(e.g. office hours, see Table 1) as well as non-course activities and engagements (see Table 3).
NECESSARY FEATURES OF THE UNDERGRADUATE SPACE
Our primary motivation in writing this letter is to assure that the new lounge space allows for the same community and academic benefits as the current lounge does. In this spirit, we have compiled a list of key features and resources that reflect our conception of an effective community space (see Table 2). This list equally represents the most crucial benefits of the current lounge configuration.
Within this table, we would like to highlight two key components. The first is 24/7 access. For many students in SE3, the lounge is a second home and safe place for work and escape from busier parts of campus such as libraries and dorms. Secondly, academic resources are vital to the lounge. The drafting tables in the middle of the room allow students to spread out maps, work, and samples - a unique necessity to earth science programs wherein class projects often involve large topographical maps and cross-sections. For example, GS 55Q requires students to meet in groups and create a cross-section of California. Additionally, computers with ArcGIS, as well as other necessary programs (Matlab, Adobe Creative Suite, R, etc.), are needed for classes and research projects (see Table 2 for a comprehensive list).
CONCLUSION
As the users of the SE3 Undergraduate Lounge, we believe that strengthening lines of communication between lounge users and SE3 administrators is the best way to move forward. This letter aims to dispel a number of possible misconceptions about lounge usage. Firstly, lounge users are not primarily GS majors; rather, fewer than 50% of lounge users are GS undergraduate students (Figure 2). Secondly, time spent in the lounge outside of observed business hours is easily underestimated and accounts for a substantial portion of overall lounge usage (Figure 4). We worry that these misunderstandings may have contributed to the decision to change the lounge space. We hope that, by clarifying these misconceptions and delineating necessary lounge features, we will be able to find a compromise that meets the needs of both the Educational Initiatives team and the lounge users. For us, this means preserving the current essential features of the lounge.
FULL LETTER WITH FIGURES AND TABLES: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6D86s9-0l45U2hTM...
Updates
October 28, 2016
I have submitted a formal request for a meeting with the School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences leadership to present the data we collected on lounge usage. We are currently preparing a comprehensive briefing document that outlines why the proposed relocation is insufficient for student needs. Expect a summary of their response after our scheduled consultation.
29 Comments
When I was doing my B.S. and M.S. degrees, the "computer lab/lounges" at my respective institutions were perhaps the most important places where students interacted and felt part of a cohesive unit. The decentralization of computing labs due has reduced the need for that physical space, but this sort of communal academic space remains an intrinsic and invaluable component of the higher education experience. In my opinion, the decision to modify and/or eliminate this space without taking a broader view on the costs and benefits of these changes is myopic on the part of the administration and reveals a lack of awareness and/or concern about the needs of the Stanford Earth undergraduate student population.
Many students use the lounge most frequently outside of business hours (aka studying at night), so the amount of use that administrators see day-to-day is far less than it's actual use. Students love having this space. Why take it away?
An undergraduate work and socialization space is an important feature in most geoscience programs, and it should not be located within or adjacent to university administration offices. Our administration exists to further Stanford's educational and research missions. It's hard to see how expanding administrative office space at the expense of undergraduate facilities serves our students or research.
I agree with all the comments the students are making. I'd add that it is very well-used space, with students there at all hours. As a faculty member with an office in that building, it makes me smile every time I walk by there and see our students hard at work, and enjoying each others' company. As an advisor of a number of undergrad SESUR projects, it is really handy to know that if I drop by the lounge, I've got a good chance of finding my advisee there to talk to about our research together.
Over the last 5 years I have served as a TA for numerous undergraduate classes in the School (see below). The undergraduate lounge provides one of the only places for students to work collaboratively and to hold office hours. When I was an undergraduate the undergraduate lounge was the primary way that I met and interacted with other undergraduates, graduate students and Professors, and was a focal point for creating identity among the SE3 community. Daniel Ibarra BS GES '12, MS GES '13, PhD Candidate ESS TA for: GS 55Q, GS 150, Geophys 199, GS/ESS 12SC, ESS/EarthSys 146A
This lounge is where I have spent my toughest moments at Stanford and I don't think I could have made it through without a place to come and a community to be with. Having a smaller lounge with more people would take away all the best things about the geo lounge. If the school wants more of a community in geo corner, more people should be encouraged to be in the lounge as it is before the administration decides to lessen space.
This isn't just a space used by undergrads, its used by graduate students, faculty and staff in the whole department and School.
I fully support the petition by SE3 undergraduate students and hope that the Dean's Office can find a suitable alternative space for the Dean's Office staff.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
When I was doing my B.S. and M.S. degrees, the "computer lab/lounges" at my respective institutions were perhaps the most important places where students interacted and felt part of a cohesive unit. The decentralization of computing labs due has reduced the need for that physical space, but this sort of communal academic space remains an intrinsic and invaluable component of the higher education experience. In my opinion, the decision to modify and/or eliminate this space without taking a broader view on the costs and benefits of these changes is myopic on the part of the administration and reveals a lack of awareness and/or concern about the needs of the Stanford Earth undergraduate student population.