Skip to main content

The funding is back and our pools will remain open to the families and seniors who depend on them. Seeing this policy reversed brings me such relief because I know how much these hours meant to my own parents. We held them to account and forced this change.

August 1, 2010

Restore the Free Swimming Programme

Restore the Free Swimming Programme

🏆 Won — 120 supporters Verified

Final supporters

L
Loraine T.
L
LES B.
S
Suzanne H.
S
Steve N.
J
James M.
F
frank c.
A
Abid C.
A
AFIA K.
A
Andrea L.
C
Councillor J.
+110 more
Started by Anonymous 16 years, 2 months ago

We the undersigned believe that the decision to end the national Free Swimming Programme for the over 60’s and under 16’s is wrong and should be reversed.

 

The Free Swimming Programme was launched as one of the major ways for the Government to deliver the objectives of the Legacy Action Plan for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. In the first year of the FSP 18 million swim  sessions were undertaken by eligible people.

Many of the young FSP participants accompanied by  paying swimmers offsetting the cost of the programme.

 

The Department of Health recommends that adults should undertake at least 30 minutes of physical activity and that children and young people should spend at least 60 minutes a day, every day of the week. Currently only 39% of men and 29% of women aged 16 and over reach the recommended level and only 32% of boys and 24% of girls aged between 2 and 15 achieve the Department’s recommended level of physical activity. The majority of indicators suggest that these figures are worsening.

The Free Swimming Programme is the first national initiative to seriously impact on people’s participation in health improvement programmes. Participation in low impact physical activity can have a marked improvement on obesity, lifestyle change, improved physical and mental well being. This approach is endorsed by  informed medical opinion. Indeed many doctors recommend regular swimming as a first stage to a healthier lifestyle. The FSP could have been at least as significant in improving public health as the reduction in smoking. 

 

Jeremy Hunt, Secretary of State for DCMS and Olympics referred to the PwC report to the effect that many people attracted by the programme would continue to swim irrespective of the availability of free swimming.

We believe that the majority of participants (under 16’s and over 60’s) would be excluded from regular swimming (4-5 times a week) by the cost.

 

The consequence of ending the Free Swimming Programme will inevitably be a net reduction in the number of swims = empty pools particularly in the most deprived parts of the country. Questions regarding the sustainability of swimming pools and likely closure removing a valued community facility even for those persons capable of paying for regular attendance.  With the inevitable deleterious public health effects.

 

We recognise that economies are required across all Government departments but cutting the Free Swimming Programme represents a missed opportunity we  therefore submit that the DCMS Secretary of State should consult with the Treasury, National Lottery, local Government  and Sports partners to investigate affordable ways to reinstate this invaluable programme.  

Updates

July 25, 2010

I have spent my mornings at the local leisure center talking to regulars who can no longer afford their daily laps. The silence from the council is frustrating but I am currently drafting a formal letter to demand a seat at the table.

July 25, 2010

Seeing this momentum grow reminds me of the afternoons my own father spent at the pool before these sessions were cut. It is clear that so many of you share this belief in the vital health benefits that free access provides.

Reached 100 supporters

July 25, 2010

6 Comments

T
Tom Atkinson
16 years ago Featured

Cut the fluff not the swimming. Its a health necessity not a luxury item.

L
Linda Chapman
16 years ago Featured

So disappointed. My grandson learned to swim because of this program. Really sad to see it go.

M
Mark Kelly
16 years ago Featured

18 million sessions proves it worked. why cut something that actually helps people???

J
Jenny Collins
16 years ago Featured

bring it back! kids need somewhere to go and this kept them out of trouble during the holidays

S
Sarah Donnelly
16 years ago Featured

my kids love swimming and we cant afford the high prices at the leisure center every week. this is so unfair

D
Dave Mehta
16 years ago Featured

Ridiculous decision. This was the only way my dad got exercise and kept active. Shame on them.