Currently there are 9 states with such laws on the books. Idaho-1976, Oklahoma-1994, Minnesota-1999, California-2001, Rode Island-2003, Louisiana-2005, Arizona-2008, New Mexico-2009 and Colorado-2013.
Within these states one can practice alternative healing methods under certain restrictions without threat of prosecution.
To understand the
need for this legislation we have to know that, in most states,
unlicensed health-care providers are, at least technically, in violation
of their state's Medical Practice Act. Consequently, they are subject
to prosecution for practicing medicine without a license. This is
because when legislation was originally written governing the practice
of medicine, it was drafted so broadly as to prohibit anyone except
licensed physicians from engaging in any healing practice.
This
means that Native American healers, Mexican curanderos, Chinese
herbalists, movement educators, yoga teachers, practitioners of
naturopathy, homeopathy, Ayurvedic healing, massage and bodywork, and
dozens of other unlicensed professions are in technical violation of the
law any time they assess or evaluate a condition or when they suggest
or perform a treatment on a client or student.
The
fact that the medical boards do not often seek prosecution of every
offender does not mean that there is not a problem. Even when medical
boards choose not to prosecute, the net effect is an inhibitory cloud
over unlicensed practitioners.
Many
practitioners, like homeopaths who are recognized and operate freely in
other countries, are often forced to work in clandestine fashion so as
not to attract the attention and possible enforcement action on the part
of the Medical Boards. In other cases it is simply a matter of these
services, old and new, not being able to develop to their highest level
of competency and professionalism. This, in turn, restricts the access
of consumers who, in ever increasing numbers, seek out these services.
Therefore, it is imperative that we petition our representatives, that Alternative Health Practitioners may be protected within the law, thus providing greater Health options for the citizens of Utah.
its my body and my choice. we should be able to see who we want for our own health without the government getting in the way. enough is enough.