Skip to main content

Foundations of Computer Science are not redundant

1,046 Comments

M
Moshe Lewenstein
5 years ago

Theory of computing has long been the source for new emerging fields, among them machine learning which is the basis for all AI today. The constant of theory of computing is that it has spearheaded new research fields ftom day one of computer science and continues to do so. Universities who want to be relevant in computer science in the future must have foundations of theory of computer science.

T
Toby Walsh
5 years ago

I think this is a terrible idea and I'm a Professor of Artificial Intelligence

T
Takeshi Tokuyama
5 years ago

As a member of Science council of Japan, I declare that CS Theory and Mathematics are major vital sources of IT technologies. Google stated from a work of students supervised by a professor in CS theory (R. Motwani, Goedel award winner), and current AI could have never appeared without theoretical study on algorithms and learnability. There is no future of CS department without CS theory.

R
Riccardo Dondi
5 years ago

I give my support to the colleagues working in Foundations of Computer Science.

H
hwan gue cho
5 years ago

Support you as one graph theorist.

S
Stefano Marrone
5 years ago

Making 10 researchers in FoCo redundant is out of any logic: business logic, too.

L
Luca Roversi
5 years ago

Reducing the biodiversity of an eco system usually has negative repercussions in the long term.

G
Gabriel Istrate
5 years ago

This is wrong on many levels and short-sighted: top AI conferences like AAMAS, AAAI, IJCAI, NEURIPS are all accepting theoretical computer science papers. AI needs theoretical computer science.

F
Fabrizio d Amore
5 years ago

Theory needs to be developed, while trends are just temporary

S
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
5 years ago

This is a staggeringly stupid move. There is a lot more to the foundations of Computing then just AI and data science. In fact, foundations in computer science have been the basis for much of the information revolution, and killing it off now will only guarantee your university's irrelevance in contributing to technology developments of the future.

C
Christoph Benzmueller
5 years ago

Short-sighted decisions like these are unfortunately spreading. Taking a very narrow focus on AI and Data Science alone will come with a high price tag for society in the long run.

D
Daniel Hirschkoff
5 years ago

Lecturer, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon

M
Maurizio Gabbrielli
5 years ago

I have been teaching AI since 20 years. It is obvious to all, also the managers of the University of Leicester, that AI is nowadays extremely important. It is perhaps less obvious that AI would not exists many people who have been working in foundations of computer science, starting, of course, from A.M. Turing. This is the usual situation of those who cannot see the forest for the trees.

M
Maria Emilia Maietti
5 years ago

Associate Professor in Mathematical Logic

N
Neil Jones
5 years ago

Good theory has shown itself invaluable for good practice in innumerable unanticipated ways since the times of the Greeks, the Renaissance, the computer, and the hardware and software surrounding us all. Leicester: it is not time to turn off the tap!

M
Mike Whalen
5 years ago

I'd still like computer science to have some science.

F
Francis Chin
5 years ago

It is short-sighted not to teach algorithms design and analysis in computer science or IT programmes, similarly not to teach mathematics in the engineering and business programmes.

S
Steve Lack
5 years ago

What a terrible idea. The reputation of Leicester is sure to suffer if this goes ahead.

G
Guoqiang Li
5 years ago

Foundations of computer science area are essential in all the other areas of information technology. I believe so.

W
Walter Tholen
5 years ago

To assume that there are truly innovative applications without solid theoretical foundations is shortsighted and naive.