We do not live in a tyrannical mass surveillance country and I intend to keep it that way
K
Kat Wexford
3 months ago
Because fuck fascism, that’s why.
J
James Hitchingham
3 months ago
Section 10. General warrants of search or seizure prohibited.
That general warrants, whereby an officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive, and ought not to be granted.
https://law.lis.virginia.gov/constitutionexpand/article1/
S
Supporter
3 months ago
I simply don’t want there to be broad surveillance that can be searched without a warrant and abused by individuals.
D
David Carter
3 months ago
I don’t want to be tracked
L
Lee Carter
3 months ago
I don’t want to be tracked
J
Joy Williams
3 months ago
This is massive breach of privacy.
A
Anne Carter
3 months ago
I don’t want to be spied on. This is not effective way to keep our community safe other than to know what we’re up to following us and using AI is over the top.!!!
C
Curt Pollock
3 months ago
Ultimately will be used as a tool in a total surveillance state. It is a violation of our 4th amendment rights.
Those who give up freedom for safety deserve neither!
C
COLIN A FARRELL
3 months ago
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
L
Linda Ludin
3 months ago
It’s already being misused by enforcement. Just to commit their personal stalking crimes. It’s an invasive invasion of privacy for mass surveillance
D
Dan Lammon
3 months ago
this is unconstitutional surveillance. o one agreed to this invasion of privacy or a digital police state.
C
Carrie Lammon
3 months ago
Privacy.
D
David Sharp
3 months ago
This is an invasion of our privacy
C
Christian Care
3 months ago
I do not want to live in a country that allows public surveillance on its citizens. Nonetheless when it goes unchecked.
T
Tyler Hanson
3 months ago
The government will always try to push the limits of what it can do. It is the duty of citizens to keep it in check.
B
Ben Bennett
3 months ago
With the ubiquity of Flock cameras and their ability to identify cars with AI to make the footage searchable, it is functionally the same as the police installing a GPS tracker on every vehicle.
J
Jeff Balik
3 months ago
Im not against the flock cameras they do have their uses, BUT they dont need to store regular people's data for 30 days. I shady cop or 1 hacker and you got a million people's daily moves, 30 days worth of data can be enough to do alot of harmful stuff. I get using it and storing, stolen cars, wanted people's rides or stuff like that, but once the system which is AI (which means it could instantly not even store it) realizes its not a "hot" plate then it shouldn't even be logged.
Flock cameras violate our rights as citizens.
We do not live in a tyrannical mass surveillance country and I intend to keep it that way
Because fuck fascism, that’s why.
Section 10. General warrants of search or seizure prohibited. That general warrants, whereby an officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive, and ought not to be granted. https://law.lis.virginia.gov/constitutionexpand/article1/
I simply don’t want there to be broad surveillance that can be searched without a warrant and abused by individuals.
I don’t want to be tracked
I don’t want to be tracked
This is massive breach of privacy.
I don’t want to be spied on. This is not effective way to keep our community safe other than to know what we’re up to following us and using AI is over the top.!!!
Ultimately will be used as a tool in a total surveillance state. It is a violation of our 4th amendment rights. Those who give up freedom for safety deserve neither!
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
It’s already being misused by enforcement. Just to commit their personal stalking crimes. It’s an invasive invasion of privacy for mass surveillance
this is unconstitutional surveillance. o one agreed to this invasion of privacy or a digital police state.
Privacy.
This is an invasion of our privacy
I do not want to live in a country that allows public surveillance on its citizens. Nonetheless when it goes unchecked.
The government will always try to push the limits of what it can do. It is the duty of citizens to keep it in check.
With the ubiquity of Flock cameras and their ability to identify cars with AI to make the footage searchable, it is functionally the same as the police installing a GPS tracker on every vehicle.
Im not against the flock cameras they do have their uses, BUT they dont need to store regular people's data for 30 days. I shady cop or 1 hacker and you got a million people's daily moves, 30 days worth of data can be enough to do alot of harmful stuff. I get using it and storing, stolen cars, wanted people's rides or stuff like that, but once the system which is AI (which means it could instantly not even store it) realizes its not a "hot" plate then it shouldn't even be logged.
Violates my constitutional rights