Skip to main content

Driggs-Reed Memorial Airport Runway Shift - 2024

59 Comments

D
Dillon Krapes
2 years ago

This is a win win. Reduction in cost and added safety. Please consider.

J
Jeff Grissom
2 years ago Featured

Turning the south 2000’ of the runway into a stopway is the only common sense course of action. When the runway is wet or contaminated by snow we usually have to cease operations. Having a stopway available will greatly enhance the usability of the airport and save money in the process.

S
Stanley Clowney
2 years ago

Hijacking your comment because it references it, but I don't see how this keeps the airport from closing for a period of time. They still have to work on the runway, right?

B
Benjamin Reese
2 years ago

Keeping the overrun will increase safety at a reduced cost.

J
Jim Little
2 years ago

As a pilot with an airplane based in Driggs, I support this proposal. It enhances safety, reduces cost and inconvenience of closing the airport, and reduces noise. Win, win, win.

M
Michael Jenkins
2 years ago

It makes much more sense to retain the current asphalt in place rather than removing it, thus providing an additional margin of safety when needed. A stopway for emergency use only is a win, win for all concerned.

L
Louis Christensen
2 years ago

A stop zone makes more sense. You don't have to water or maintain asphalt.

G
Glenn VanHouten
2 years ago

I believe this is in the best interest of all of the aviation community for Driggs

M
Mike Carver
2 years ago

Common sense, a lot more safe, Costs less than removal and planting grass.

K
Ken Koster
2 years ago Featured

30,000 + hour pilot ATP & former KDIJ Airport Board Member. This proposal is the best solution and far better than dirt (mud) or grass. Why remove a superior surface that is in and paid for?

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

Let’s err on the side of safety and step into it slowly!

J
Joseph Trucco
2 years ago

Safe, sensible, and cost effective

M
Michael Paul Gilles
2 years ago

It's a positive solution and more effective. Much less expensive too.

A
Aaron Todd
2 years ago

Please keep the south end of the runway intact as opposed to digging up and planting grass. The safety factor and cost savings should be sufficient evidence that this it’s the intelligent choice.

S
Steve Phillips
2 years ago

Common sense idea

T
thomas nulman
2 years ago

The paved runway is in place and could service in an emergency. It really makes little sense to spend time money on removing it.

B
Brent Blue
2 years ago

190 Mustang Drive, Driggs

T
TJ McCann
2 years ago

This makes complete sense. Reduces cost, closure time, and INCREASES SAFETY. What more could anyone want. Overruns are very common at airports worldwide and there is no reason not to have one at Driggs.

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

Great idea!!