Opposition to Proposed Southwood DRI and PUD Amendments
63 Comments
J
Jane Dixon
2 years ago
Featured
Proper vetting of these amendments should be in place for owners in the community. Language that is understood by all and not requires interpretation.
D
David Lunger
2 years ago
I oppose the proposed changes
B
Brian Kelley
2 years ago
St Joe should be required to complete the road infrastructure as stipulated in the original DRI.
A
Andrew Limburg
2 years ago
Featured
Orange Ave should have been reconstructed YEARS ago. Pushing this off to 2038 is totally and completely incomprehensible
I
Ingrid yegres
2 years ago
For the community and safety of our neighborhood we can’t have house built in the road. We also desperately need a second club house. We have a very large neighborhood
V
Varun Moots
2 years ago
Jasmine Hill Rd
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
I oppose
T
Thomas R Sawicki
2 years ago
Our community desperately needs more communal space. In particular, a pool. There are too many people in the neighborhood for a single community pool. This is an issue of hygiene and safety.
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
I agree
D
Dietrich George
2 years ago
We need more amenities. The amount of people we have in this community for one pool is ridiculous
C
Cristina Dusek
2 years ago
I oppose the proposed changes
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
I am in opposition of the proposed delay in the completion dates for our internal transportation network.
I also oppose the proposal to rezone and convert the NVC unit to pure residential uses (MDR).
C
Catherine M Jones
2 years ago
We need the arterial roads completed in the original time frame for the safety of our community.
B
Bobbie Smith
2 years ago
I am in opposition of the proposed delay in the completion dates for our internal transportation network.
I also oppose the proposal to rezone and convert the NVC unit to pure residential uses (MDR).
Please note my home is deeded under my previous name (Bobbie Baggett)
B
Brett Ewing
2 years ago
St. Joe is treating Southwood residents with very little respect.
Proper vetting of these amendments should be in place for owners in the community. Language that is understood by all and not requires interpretation.
I oppose the proposed changes
St Joe should be required to complete the road infrastructure as stipulated in the original DRI.
Orange Ave should have been reconstructed YEARS ago. Pushing this off to 2038 is totally and completely incomprehensible
For the community and safety of our neighborhood we can’t have house built in the road. We also desperately need a second club house. We have a very large neighborhood
Jasmine Hill Rd
I oppose
Our community desperately needs more communal space. In particular, a pool. There are too many people in the neighborhood for a single community pool. This is an issue of hygiene and safety.
I agree
We need more amenities. The amount of people we have in this community for one pool is ridiculous
I oppose the proposed changes
I am in opposition of the proposed delay in the completion dates for our internal transportation network. I also oppose the proposal to rezone and convert the NVC unit to pure residential uses (MDR).
We need the arterial roads completed in the original time frame for the safety of our community.
I am in opposition of the proposed delay in the completion dates for our internal transportation network. I also oppose the proposal to rezone and convert the NVC unit to pure residential uses (MDR). Please note my home is deeded under my previous name (Bobbie Baggett)
St. Joe is treating Southwood residents with very little respect.
Mulberry Park Blvd.
Longfellow Road
Lantana Lane
Jasmine Hill Rd
I oppose