Don't Let Them Unbalance The Ecology Of Our Natural Environment ... "Say NO to LNG in the Bamfield - Barkley Sound Area
63 Comments
G
gregory thomas
11 years ago
there are lots of other ways to bring jobs/economy to the area other than signing a deal with the devil....
G
Greta Picard
11 years ago
LNG needs to takes it money and promises back home to Texas and stay there, LNG is not wanted in BC, especially NOT in our BARLEY SOUND AREA. LNG is not ecology friendly and is unbalancing our climate. TIME TO SHUT IT DOWN AND SEND THEM OUT OF CANADA
D
Dylan
11 years ago
Fuck LNG
E
Elena Buscher
11 years ago
I have spent countless days in Bamfield and the surrounding area. Its pristine nature deserves to not be spoiled and maintained in such a way that the traditional uses by the Huu-ay-aht First Nations are not interfered with and this culture can reap the benefits from what is rightfully theirs. Short term economic benefits stand in stark contrast to the long-lasting adverse environmental impacts from building and operations of the Steelhead LNG plant.
A
Andhra Azevedo
11 years ago
I am very concerned about the proposed Steelhead LNG plant in Barkley Sound. Although I understand that there would be short-term economic benefits from a project like this, relying on a single resource as an economic fix-all will not lead to long-term economic stability. In light of increasing international concerns about the stability of fossil fuel investments due to the recognized need to price carbon to limit climate change, this development does not seem like a good long-term economic or ecological decision. The Bamfield-Barkley Sound has amazing natural richness, which benefits all people who live and work in the area; it should be protected.
L
Lindsay Orr
11 years ago
please consider opposing an LNG terminal on this region of our unique and beautiful coastline. The area is dear to my heart an I can vouch for its value as it is.
T
Tao Eastham
11 years ago
I am deeply concerned that an LNG terminal at Sarita Bay will drastically change the environment and culture of the Bamfield / Anacla region – an area I deeply love. I am sure the project will bring some economic benefits, but I do not believe these benefits will be a “fix all” for the regional economy. Additionally, I do not think the environmental and social consequences of the project have been adequately discussed or represented.
M
Melissa Smith
11 years ago
NO to LNG !! We need to protect and preserve our land, surrounding waters, wildlife and marine life!
M
Mr. Rafe Sunshine
11 years ago
Keeping fossil fuels in the ground is more important than extracting/ exploiting them to save our planet from global warming through the CO2 emissions of burning these fossil fuels.
M
Molly Clappis
11 years ago
Na'as hear our prayers
J
Janet Hicks
11 years ago
I care about the lands & the waterways in Barkley Sound ... Bamfield- Sarita areas - along with the rest of our vibrant coast
L
Lynne Alton
11 years ago
I share your concern about the huge impacts of fracking and of shipping LNG (liquid natural gas) in very large tankers down our coast.
B
Bill Friesen
11 years ago
This should be a no brainer
R
Ron Bolin
11 years ago
It's the only environment we have. It should not be for sale wholesale.
J
June Ross
11 years ago
The extraction of our natural resources must stop! NOW!! I wish the population would awaken from their slumber and realize the devastation we are leaving for our children and grandchildren! It is ridiculous!
W
Wendy Kotilla
11 years ago
Featured
Sarita Bay is a special place inhabited by Huu-ay-aht First Nation people for thousands of years. This proposed LNG Plant has nothing to do with living with the land and will only serve the pocketbooks of a few. In the interest of future generations of all species this is not the kind of footprint we want to leave. No to this LNG Plant.
L
Len Walker
11 years ago
The earth sustains us: We must protect the earth from the GREED of the Corporations
J
J. Scott Storle
11 years ago
Now both of our governments, the one in Ottawa and now Christie Clark in BC. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, we will kick them all out.
S
Stacey Gaiga
11 years ago
For anyone who isn't informed read these articles: SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN Aug. 20, 2013 Groundwater Contamination May End the Gas-Francking Boom, USA TODAY Fracking linked to radioactive river water, VANITY FAIR A Colossal Fracking Mess, THE HUFFINGTON POST Former Health Secretary; Pennsylvania Didn't Seriously Study Fracking Health Impacts & Pennsylvania Fracking Company Offers Residents Cash to Buy Protection From Claims of Harm... WHY? Because gas for LNG in the Bamfield -Barkley Sound Area means harming others in BC.
L
Lia Chalifour
11 years ago
I personally had the opportunity to experience these areas in an incredibly meaningful and educational context, and also recognize their high value to everyone living in the Bamfield area. The cost of this development is too high for the potential short-term gains. I vote no to the proposed LNG plant at Sarita.
there are lots of other ways to bring jobs/economy to the area other than signing a deal with the devil....
LNG needs to takes it money and promises back home to Texas and stay there, LNG is not wanted in BC, especially NOT in our BARLEY SOUND AREA. LNG is not ecology friendly and is unbalancing our climate. TIME TO SHUT IT DOWN AND SEND THEM OUT OF CANADA
Fuck LNG
I have spent countless days in Bamfield and the surrounding area. Its pristine nature deserves to not be spoiled and maintained in such a way that the traditional uses by the Huu-ay-aht First Nations are not interfered with and this culture can reap the benefits from what is rightfully theirs. Short term economic benefits stand in stark contrast to the long-lasting adverse environmental impacts from building and operations of the Steelhead LNG plant.
I am very concerned about the proposed Steelhead LNG plant in Barkley Sound. Although I understand that there would be short-term economic benefits from a project like this, relying on a single resource as an economic fix-all will not lead to long-term economic stability. In light of increasing international concerns about the stability of fossil fuel investments due to the recognized need to price carbon to limit climate change, this development does not seem like a good long-term economic or ecological decision. The Bamfield-Barkley Sound has amazing natural richness, which benefits all people who live and work in the area; it should be protected.
please consider opposing an LNG terminal on this region of our unique and beautiful coastline. The area is dear to my heart an I can vouch for its value as it is.
I am deeply concerned that an LNG terminal at Sarita Bay will drastically change the environment and culture of the Bamfield / Anacla region – an area I deeply love. I am sure the project will bring some economic benefits, but I do not believe these benefits will be a “fix all” for the regional economy. Additionally, I do not think the environmental and social consequences of the project have been adequately discussed or represented.
NO to LNG !! We need to protect and preserve our land, surrounding waters, wildlife and marine life!
Keeping fossil fuels in the ground is more important than extracting/ exploiting them to save our planet from global warming through the CO2 emissions of burning these fossil fuels.
Na'as hear our prayers
I care about the lands & the waterways in Barkley Sound ... Bamfield- Sarita areas - along with the rest of our vibrant coast
I share your concern about the huge impacts of fracking and of shipping LNG (liquid natural gas) in very large tankers down our coast.
This should be a no brainer
It's the only environment we have. It should not be for sale wholesale.
The extraction of our natural resources must stop! NOW!! I wish the population would awaken from their slumber and realize the devastation we are leaving for our children and grandchildren! It is ridiculous!
Sarita Bay is a special place inhabited by Huu-ay-aht First Nation people for thousands of years. This proposed LNG Plant has nothing to do with living with the land and will only serve the pocketbooks of a few. In the interest of future generations of all species this is not the kind of footprint we want to leave. No to this LNG Plant.
The earth sustains us: We must protect the earth from the GREED of the Corporations
Now both of our governments, the one in Ottawa and now Christie Clark in BC. There is a light at the end of the tunnel, we will kick them all out.
For anyone who isn't informed read these articles: SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN Aug. 20, 2013 Groundwater Contamination May End the Gas-Francking Boom, USA TODAY Fracking linked to radioactive river water, VANITY FAIR A Colossal Fracking Mess, THE HUFFINGTON POST Former Health Secretary; Pennsylvania Didn't Seriously Study Fracking Health Impacts & Pennsylvania Fracking Company Offers Residents Cash to Buy Protection From Claims of Harm... WHY? Because gas for LNG in the Bamfield -Barkley Sound Area means harming others in BC.
I personally had the opportunity to experience these areas in an incredibly meaningful and educational context, and also recognize their high value to everyone living in the Bamfield area. The cost of this development is too high for the potential short-term gains. I vote no to the proposed LNG plant at Sarita.