The board has officially backed down from the withdrawal proposal. It was a long fight that took more out of me than I care to admit but we finally got the outcome we needed. I will be watching the next meeting closely to ensure they stick to this.
January 2, 2017
Final supporters
We, the citizens of District 102, petition the Board of Education to complete a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed withdrawal from the LaGrange Area Department of Special Education (LADSE) Cooperative. We request that the Board of Education do further due diligence on the financial ramifications of leaving the cooperative.
There has not been a transparent and comprehensive presentation that demonstrates the advantages of the withdraw. We have found the information presented to the board to be one-sided and not data or fact-driven.
LADSE recruits, hires, supervises, supports, and retains specialized professionals. LADSE is not a contract agency. It offers the districts it serves supervisory services for specialized personnel. This assistance can be crucial for personnel who may be the only professionals in a school offering the services they perform. These individuals need mentoring and support to the same extent as classroom teachers. LADSE provides that mentoring and support. LADSE offers the districts it serves long-term substitute coverage through its network and recruitment. LADSE offers specialized professional development to district personnel concerning students with low incidence needs. The cooperative is a network between a large number of neighboring districts. Without a cooperative, the district loses its safety net for specialized expertise.
The LADSE Cooperative provides wrap-around services and assistive technology services at no additional cost to the district. Some of the services, such as autism consultation, are not currently utilized by the district. In the adminstration's last presentation, an adminstrator indicated that the district would simply hire a part time assistive technology professional. But, there was no discussion of the cost of assistive technology materials, staff training, or the cost of joining an assistive technology network, such as Infinitec. These are services and resources the district is provided through our LADSE contract at no additional cost.
Hinsdale withdrew from LADSE three years ago and is now paying approximately $2 million dollars more per year for its special services. Taxpayers in District 102 recently passed a real estate tax hike to subsidize the financial shortfall of District 102. If our district will increase expenses on account of its withdrawal from LADSE like Hinsdale did, where will it obtain the money for these additional costs?
When presenting financial reports to the Board concerning a LADSE withdrawal, the school district did not include several financial considerations in the analysis. For instance, the analysis fails to include Health Insurance and Pension fund contributions for new employees. Moreover, there will be a 15% reduction in the cost of LADSE services next school year due to retirement incentives for 17 LADSE personnel, who are in their last year of 6% increases, during the 2017 Fiscal Year. This retirement incentive option ends in 2018.
Currently, LADSE provides transportation for its students. If District 102 provided the transportation currently provided by LADSE, LADSE estimates that the expenses would be approximately 84% higher than our current transportation expenses. Transportation costs were not included in the analysis to the board.
The taxpayers of District 102 voted to approve the referendum to ensure the students of the District receive a high quality education. We also want to verify that students with disabilities receive the same level of services as well. In order to ensure this, an evaluation of the costs of withdrawal from the cooperative needs to be conducted. This analysis should assume we are not cutting any services currently provided through the withdrawal, while also ensuring we can provide additional services to our most needy students.
Reviewing public documents on the Governmental Funds Expenditures of Hinsdale Township High School District 86, the cost of special education grew by $2 million the year after it withdrew from LADSE. Our community did not support a referendum to see costs rise.
We strongly advise the Board of Education to delay the vote to withdraw from the LADSE Cooperative until mid-2017, once the further information has been gathered and presented.
Updates
November 16, 2016
We hit 250 signatures today. It has been a exhausting road to get here but seeing this level of interest keeps me moving forward despite the silence from the board.
Reached 250 supporters
November 15, 2016
Reached 100 supporters
November 14, 2016
50 Comments
I lived through the pull out of LADSE from 86. Worst decision ever. My kids were served by WAY less quality Speech and Occupational Therapist. They had no plan and our taxes continued to increase. LADSE helped explain our kids delays and how they impacted his classroom success. No one hired at the school could do half the job LADSE has done.
I have a special needs child that has benefitted from the support LADSE has give staff at Ogden. This would be a great disservice to the community and the teachers that support these kids!!!
It is incumbent upon the Board to conduct a comprehensive cost study to determine the wisdom of continuing to use the services of LADSE or switch to self-funding. All incremental costs must be included in the study. We do not want to end up paying more than what we have today or sacrificing quality education of those disabled.
LADSE's services will maintain a much higher level of quality than 102 can provide on its own. LADSE can minimize the impact of turnover or regulation shifts. Instead of withdrawing, 102 needs to hold LADSE accountable and maximize their services to the fullest extent possible.
As a mental health professional and parent in the district, I have seen the tremendous benefits of a unified organization taking care of the spectrum of special needs. Providing for specialized educational needs is not inexpensive. Let's let the organization with experience and a proven track record continue to serve our children's needs.
My daughter uses LADSE for her vision impairment and benefits from it greatly. Would be such a shame for all the families using this to have it removed from the district.
I have a great grand daughter that lives in LaGrange, Ill. and needs Special Education (LADSE).
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
The board has officially backed down from the withdrawal proposal. It was a long fight that took more out of me than I care to admit but we finally got the outcome we needed. I will be watching the next meeting closely to ensure they stick to this.
January 2, 2017
Final supporters
We, the citizens of District 102, petition the Board of Education to complete a cost-benefit analysis of the proposed withdrawal from the LaGrange Area Department of Special Education (LADSE) Cooperative. We request that the Board of Education do further due diligence on the financial ramifications of leaving the cooperative.
There has not been a transparent and comprehensive presentation that demonstrates the advantages of the withdraw. We have found the information presented to the board to be one-sided and not data or fact-driven.
LADSE recruits, hires, supervises, supports, and retains specialized professionals. LADSE is not a contract agency. It offers the districts it serves supervisory services for specialized personnel. This assistance can be crucial for personnel who may be the only professionals in a school offering the services they perform. These individuals need mentoring and support to the same extent as classroom teachers. LADSE provides that mentoring and support. LADSE offers the districts it serves long-term substitute coverage through its network and recruitment. LADSE offers specialized professional development to district personnel concerning students with low incidence needs. The cooperative is a network between a large number of neighboring districts. Without a cooperative, the district loses its safety net for specialized expertise.
The LADSE Cooperative provides wrap-around services and assistive technology services at no additional cost to the district. Some of the services, such as autism consultation, are not currently utilized by the district. In the adminstration's last presentation, an adminstrator indicated that the district would simply hire a part time assistive technology professional. But, there was no discussion of the cost of assistive technology materials, staff training, or the cost of joining an assistive technology network, such as Infinitec. These are services and resources the district is provided through our LADSE contract at no additional cost.
Hinsdale withdrew from LADSE three years ago and is now paying approximately $2 million dollars more per year for its special services. Taxpayers in District 102 recently passed a real estate tax hike to subsidize the financial shortfall of District 102. If our district will increase expenses on account of its withdrawal from LADSE like Hinsdale did, where will it obtain the money for these additional costs?
When presenting financial reports to the Board concerning a LADSE withdrawal, the school district did not include several financial considerations in the analysis. For instance, the analysis fails to include Health Insurance and Pension fund contributions for new employees. Moreover, there will be a 15% reduction in the cost of LADSE services next school year due to retirement incentives for 17 LADSE personnel, who are in their last year of 6% increases, during the 2017 Fiscal Year. This retirement incentive option ends in 2018.
Currently, LADSE provides transportation for its students. If District 102 provided the transportation currently provided by LADSE, LADSE estimates that the expenses would be approximately 84% higher than our current transportation expenses. Transportation costs were not included in the analysis to the board.
The taxpayers of District 102 voted to approve the referendum to ensure the students of the District receive a high quality education. We also want to verify that students with disabilities receive the same level of services as well. In order to ensure this, an evaluation of the costs of withdrawal from the cooperative needs to be conducted. This analysis should assume we are not cutting any services currently provided through the withdrawal, while also ensuring we can provide additional services to our most needy students.
Reviewing public documents on the Governmental Funds Expenditures of Hinsdale Township High School District 86, the cost of special education grew by $2 million the year after it withdrew from LADSE. Our community did not support a referendum to see costs rise.
We strongly advise the Board of Education to delay the vote to withdraw from the LADSE Cooperative until mid-2017, once the further information has been gathered and presented.
Updates
November 16, 2016
We hit 250 signatures today. It has been a exhausting road to get here but seeing this level of interest keeps me moving forward despite the silence from the board.
Reached 250 supporters
November 15, 2016
Reached 100 supporters
November 14, 2016
50 Comments
They are not using the autism consultation services because they are hiring a friend of the assistant superintendent of special-education; and who has a limited background in autism with no degree in developmental psychology. This is what happens when services are contracted out. There is neither quality nor cost control.
I lived through the pull out of LADSE from 86. Worst decision ever. My kids were served by WAY less quality Speech and Occupational Therapist. They had no plan and our taxes continued to increase. LADSE helped explain our kids delays and how they impacted his classroom success. No one hired at the school could do half the job LADSE has done.
I have a special needs child that has benefitted from the support LADSE has give staff at Ogden. This would be a great disservice to the community and the teachers that support these kids!!!
It is incumbent upon the Board to conduct a comprehensive cost study to determine the wisdom of continuing to use the services of LADSE or switch to self-funding. All incremental costs must be included in the study. We do not want to end up paying more than what we have today or sacrificing quality education of those disabled.
LADSE's services will maintain a much higher level of quality than 102 can provide on its own. LADSE can minimize the impact of turnover or regulation shifts. Instead of withdrawing, 102 needs to hold LADSE accountable and maximize their services to the fullest extent possible.
As a mental health professional and parent in the district, I have seen the tremendous benefits of a unified organization taking care of the spectrum of special needs. Providing for specialized educational needs is not inexpensive. Let's let the organization with experience and a proven track record continue to serve our children's needs.
My daughter uses LADSE for her vision impairment and benefits from it greatly. Would be such a shame for all the families using this to have it removed from the district.
I have a great grand daughter that lives in LaGrange, Ill. and needs Special Education (LADSE).
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
They are not using the autism consultation services because they are hiring a friend of the assistant superintendent of special-education; and who has a limited background in autism with no degree in developmental psychology. This is what happens when services are contracted out. There is neither quality nor cost control.