Demand an OFCOM investigation into Helen Wood winning Big Brother 2014, independent and impartial of Channel 5.
1,891 Comments
T
Tom McCann
12 years ago
Featured
Helen Wood received 14 warnings in the first four days. Helen invaded personal space and bullied fellow contestants. Isn't it a coincidence that the only time Big Brother introduces a "pass to the final", the person who receives the pass actually wins?
A
Ann Tutt
12 years ago
Featured
By giving this woman a pass to the final I believe Channel 5 were able to ensure she won this was not the viewers choice it was in my opinion her agent a part owner of channel 5's choice therefore all money spent voting on anyone else was made by deception
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Featured
Three simple questions.....was Pauline influenced by producers into granting Helen the pass to the final? Did Helen Wood get an appearance fee for Big Brother? Which housemates came through the audition process and which were auditioned via agencies?!
D
debbie
12 years ago
Helen Wood is signed to Northern & Shell talent agency which is owned by Richard Desmond who owns C5 surely that isn't surprising that she is the winner of BB 2014. But what will be surprising is IF no one asks how there is no conflict of interest or breach of competition rules (in business) there really should be an inquiry into this and also who voted and where the votes came from which can all be tracked and accounted for. People voted and payed money to vote they should DEMAND a full investigation.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Deborah Woollard Helen Wood is signed to Northern & Shell talent agency which is owned by Richard Desmond who owns C5 surely that isn't surprising that she is the winner of BB 2014. But what will be surprising is IF no one asks how there is no conflict of interest or breach of competition rules (in business) there really should be an inquiry into this and also who voted and where the votes came from which can all be tracked and accounted for. People voted and payed money to vote they should DEMAND a full investigation.
M
Mike Wilson
12 years ago
Bbbots had many guests use the word bully towards Helen & each time the presenter would over rule & lead discussion in another direction, seemed to me like instructions to presenters to overlook the bullying.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
I agree it was rigged as I tried to ring Ashleigh's line but it was closed 4 minutes earelier than Helen's and The Wright Stuff showed Helen had 14 warnings when we were only shown 3. I am 100% certain this was rigged & Asheligh won & the title should be given back to it's rightful winner as 100's of 1,000's of people should get their money back
C
Cheryl Hughes
12 years ago
Needs investigating as her manager owns channel 5, had warnings over her bullying & warnings were never carried out so she should have had her pass removed. People other years would have been evicted but nothing was done. Blatant fix
D
Debbie Jones
12 years ago
An earlier final warning & subsequent dismissal due to aggressive bullying & threatening behaviour. Also investigation into voting in final week.
T
Tracy Webb
12 years ago
I'm not happy with Helens behaviour in the house, she was warned & still not removed from the house. I do not trust the final result, I can not believe she won under normal circumstances!
A
Amy Thring
12 years ago
There is something very wrong with Helen wood "winning" BB her agent being so intricately involved with channel 5 & the agreed contracts before her entrance to the regular BB already having people talking about fixing. The voting app was fundamentally flawed & didnt work half the time & Helen was clearly not liked by the vast majority of viewers. You only need look at the viewers comments on the Big brother facebook page or any Big brother forum to know Helen wood was hated by most viewers & voters. Also the Big brother rules on bullying were stretched to the point of laughable double standards in helens favour & the footage & tasks all geared at desperatly trying to make Helen look good to viewers who were not fooled & continuously complained on facebook twitter & forums etc, I think channel 5 & the voting process seriously need investigating as it is completely ridiculous to expect the viewing public to believe one of the most reviled contestants in BB history could win. it makes a mockery of all tv voting & has convinced myself & hundreds of other viewers that these shows should either be upfront & say that our votes count for nothing or put these shows on without the voting process, i feel like every voter has been robbed & they are profiting from a sham voting system based on greed & lies.
Helen Wood received 14 warnings in the first four days. Helen invaded personal space and bullied fellow contestants. Isn't it a coincidence that the only time Big Brother introduces a "pass to the final", the person who receives the pass actually wins?
By giving this woman a pass to the final I believe Channel 5 were able to ensure she won this was not the viewers choice it was in my opinion her agent a part owner of channel 5's choice therefore all money spent voting on anyone else was made by deception
Three simple questions.....was Pauline influenced by producers into granting Helen the pass to the final? Did Helen Wood get an appearance fee for Big Brother? Which housemates came through the audition process and which were auditioned via agencies?!
Helen Wood is signed to Northern & Shell talent agency which is owned by Richard Desmond who owns C5 surely that isn't surprising that she is the winner of BB 2014. But what will be surprising is IF no one asks how there is no conflict of interest or breach of competition rules (in business) there really should be an inquiry into this and also who voted and where the votes came from which can all be tracked and accounted for. People voted and payed money to vote they should DEMAND a full investigation.
Deborah Woollard Helen Wood is signed to Northern & Shell talent agency which is owned by Richard Desmond who owns C5 surely that isn't surprising that she is the winner of BB 2014. But what will be surprising is IF no one asks how there is no conflict of interest or breach of competition rules (in business) there really should be an inquiry into this and also who voted and where the votes came from which can all be tracked and accounted for. People voted and payed money to vote they should DEMAND a full investigation.
Bbbots had many guests use the word bully towards Helen & each time the presenter would over rule & lead discussion in another direction, seemed to me like instructions to presenters to overlook the bullying.
I agree it was rigged as I tried to ring Ashleigh's line but it was closed 4 minutes earelier than Helen's and The Wright Stuff showed Helen had 14 warnings when we were only shown 3. I am 100% certain this was rigged & Asheligh won & the title should be given back to it's rightful winner as 100's of 1,000's of people should get their money back
Needs investigating as her manager owns channel 5, had warnings over her bullying & warnings were never carried out so she should have had her pass removed. People other years would have been evicted but nothing was done. Blatant fix
An earlier final warning & subsequent dismissal due to aggressive bullying & threatening behaviour. Also investigation into voting in final week.
I'm not happy with Helens behaviour in the house, she was warned & still not removed from the house. I do not trust the final result, I can not believe she won under normal circumstances!
There is something very wrong with Helen wood "winning" BB her agent being so intricately involved with channel 5 & the agreed contracts before her entrance to the regular BB already having people talking about fixing. The voting app was fundamentally flawed & didnt work half the time & Helen was clearly not liked by the vast majority of viewers. You only need look at the viewers comments on the Big brother facebook page or any Big brother forum to know Helen wood was hated by most viewers & voters. Also the Big brother rules on bullying were stretched to the point of laughable double standards in helens favour & the footage & tasks all geared at desperatly trying to make Helen look good to viewers who were not fooled & continuously complained on facebook twitter & forums etc, I think channel 5 & the voting process seriously need investigating as it is completely ridiculous to expect the viewing public to believe one of the most reviled contestants in BB history could win. it makes a mockery of all tv voting & has convinced myself & hundreds of other viewers that these shows should either be upfront & say that our votes count for nothing or put these shows on without the voting process, i feel like every voter has been robbed & they are profiting from a sham voting system based on greed & lies.