She won and no one can take that away from her but if there was unethical practices going on this has to be investigated. The public are wasting money voting is there is something funny going on.
A
Abby French
12 years ago
Something sneaky has gone on, let's get to the bottom of it!
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
How did she get away with her disgusting behaviour for so long?
fast tracked through the audition process. Given a pass to the final. Had the final week#'s edit built around her and her 'redemption' . Her warnings by BB not shown - could this be because after her 'final'warning early on she was told once more and she was out, so how could BB show her getting another warning and then justify not removing her from the house? She was clearly the chosen winner, and this is not fair.
M
Matilda McCullagh
12 years ago
Taking viewers money to select bb winner when it was clearly fixed from start.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Seems very suspicous, an independant investigation is needed in my opinion
Dodgy from the start, I'd also like to know if she auditioned or was invited onto the show. And was she paid a fee?
S
Sandy
12 years ago
It is not possible for a public vote 'winner' to be so unpopular with the voting public ... unless something underhand was going on.
L
Lisa Cooke
12 years ago
Show was a fix from the start to the finish, Helen bullied a number of house mates, but nothing was done, the voting lines also went down and we could not vote for Ashleigh who is the real winner
W
Wilmahobbin
12 years ago
Hellen was abuisive aggressive and a bully she should have been put out after several warnings
[email protected]
It is not possible for a public vote 'winner ' to be so unpopular with the voting public....unless something underhand was going on.
She should never have been given a place in the house considering her close connections to Channel 5 owners.
Total fix! Needs looking into
What a coincidence that the horrible women who would have been out first own with a free
[email protected]
She won and no one can take that away from her but if there was unethical practices going on this has to be investigated. The public are wasting money voting is there is something funny going on.
Something sneaky has gone on, let's get to the bottom of it!
How did she get away with her disgusting behaviour for so long?
[email protected]
fast tracked through the audition process. Given a pass to the final. Had the final week#'s edit built around her and her 'redemption' . Her warnings by BB not shown - could this be because after her 'final'warning early on she was told once more and she was out, so how could BB show her getting another warning and then justify not removing her from the house? She was clearly the chosen winner, and this is not fair.
Taking viewers money to select bb winner when it was clearly fixed from start.
Seems very suspicous, an independant investigation is needed in my opinion
[email protected]
Dodgy from the start, I'd also like to know if she auditioned or was invited onto the show. And was she paid a fee?
It is not possible for a public vote 'winner' to be so unpopular with the voting public ... unless something underhand was going on.
Show was a fix from the start to the finish, Helen bullied a number of house mates, but nothing was done, the voting lines also went down and we could not vote for Ashleigh who is the real winner
Hellen was abuisive aggressive and a bully she should have been put out after several warnings
Unfair
this definately needs investigated