Richard Dawkins and William Craig Should Debate Each Other
14 Comments
N
nic
5 years ago
wow
M
Miguel Lorenzo Maturino
8 years ago
Featured
I cannot put into words how excited for the mere possibility of this debate existing.
م
محمد فوزي
8 years ago
Richard Dawkins and William Craig Should Debate Each Other
M
Mark Metternich
8 years ago
Richard Dawkins, please quit RUNNING from Bill Craig. Thank you.
A
Albert
9 years ago
They just have to debate, they have to...
J
John Nguyen
10 years ago
This debate needs to go down.
D
Dayvid Victor
11 years ago
Featured
William Lane Craig claims that the argument of Dawkins is invalid. Dawkins claims that nobody ever proved he wrong ... so the point is: "Why Dawkins still refuses to debate Craig?".
There is only one possible answer: fear!
Which makes me believe that Dawkins knows his arguments aren't valid, and yet, he insists in his position. The Bible (that he insists to mock) is right once again:
"For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools" - Romans 1:21-22
D
Dayvid Victor
11 years ago
Featured
William Lane Craig claims that the argument of Dawkins is invalid. Dawkins claims that nobody ever proved he wrong ... so the point is: "Why Dawkins still refuses to debate Craig?".
There is only one possible answer: fear!
Which makes me believe that Dawkins knows his arguments aren't valid, and yet, he insists in his position. The Bible (that he insists to mock) is right once again:
"For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools" - Romans 1:21-22
Samuel Tovias
I would like watch a debate about the question: "God does exist?" But with only one person of each side, and more specifically with Professor Richard Dawkins on one side and Dr. William Lane Craig defending the other position.
D
Danny WIlliams
11 years ago
There's probably no Dawkins,
So stop worrying and watch Hitchens debate Lane Craig
D
Danny WIlliams
11 years ago
Featured
There's probably no Dawkins,
So stop worrying and watch Hitchens debate Lane Craig
D
david
12 years ago
Featured
Bem... Acho que os pressupostos materialistas, de que, tudo surgiu do nada e ao acaso não são sulfitantes para um debate contra o Dr. William Lane Craig. Sem estas armas o Dr. Richard Dawkins é incapaz de provar algo, a não ser que ele parta de um debate solido e racional para chacotas bobas e infantis que abalam a fé só daqueles que nunca a tiveram. Espero um dia ainda ver um debate de verdade entre os dois. Abraços a todos.
wow
I cannot put into words how excited for the mere possibility of this debate existing.
Richard Dawkins and William Craig Should Debate Each Other
Richard Dawkins, please quit RUNNING from Bill Craig. Thank you.
They just have to debate, they have to...
This debate needs to go down.
William Lane Craig claims that the argument of Dawkins is invalid. Dawkins claims that nobody ever proved he wrong ... so the point is: "Why Dawkins still refuses to debate Craig?". There is only one possible answer: fear! Which makes me believe that Dawkins knows his arguments aren't valid, and yet, he insists in his position. The Bible (that he insists to mock) is right once again: "For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools" - Romans 1:21-22
William Lane Craig claims that the argument of Dawkins is invalid. Dawkins claims that nobody ever proved he wrong ... so the point is: "Why Dawkins still refuses to debate Craig?". There is only one possible answer: fear! Which makes me believe that Dawkins knows his arguments aren't valid, and yet, he insists in his position. The Bible (that he insists to mock) is right once again: "For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools" - Romans 1:21-22
I would like watch a debate about the question: "God does exist?" But with only one person of each side, and more specifically with Professor Richard Dawkins on one side and Dr. William Lane Craig defending the other position.
There's probably no Dawkins, So stop worrying and watch Hitchens debate Lane Craig
There's probably no Dawkins, So stop worrying and watch Hitchens debate Lane Craig
Bem... Acho que os pressupostos materialistas, de que, tudo surgiu do nada e ao acaso não são sulfitantes para um debate contra o Dr. William Lane Craig. Sem estas armas o Dr. Richard Dawkins é incapaz de provar algo, a não ser que ele parta de um debate solido e racional para chacotas bobas e infantis que abalam a fé só daqueles que nunca a tiveram. Espero um dia ainda ver um debate de verdade entre os dois. Abraços a todos.
Dawkins is a coward! lol
Deveria ser um debate como qualquer outro.-