Skip to main content

Damand my rights back

26 Comments

J
Jeremy oran
2 years ago

Wat up, passsn thru chicago, i always think about u snack

A
Anita
8 years ago

Good luck

A
Anita Bueno
8 years ago

Good luck!!!

T
Tom hatch
8 years ago

I think you should be able to see your daughter every body deserves to see there kids

J
john winchester
8 years ago

im praying that u get ur rights back i know it hard but keep ur head up one day soon ur wish will come true

R
Richard Wesley DeWees
8 years ago

I have signed this petition

K
Kevin matos
8 years ago

Keep fights, never give up

D
Daniel Kasper
8 years ago Featured

Ive known Jodi for awhile. She one of the most reliable and sincere women i know. She's been loyal to the courts request. I personally feel she earned and deserves to be fully heard. She has been loyal to everything required. If i may be off further notice. Contact me at 708-510-5716. Sincerely Daniel Kasper.

L
Lee
8 years ago

Do the right thing .

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Keep the fight!! You have your rights as well!!

V
Valeriia orlova
8 years ago

Good luck with your daughter

C
Cydney brand
8 years ago Featured

I have spent lots of time with Jodi and her other daughter, Ava. Jodi is an amazing mother; she is nurturing, kind, giving, attentive, and loving. She is someone that would put her Childs life before her own, as any parent should. Separating a mother from her child is just wrong and cruel. Especially separating a child from a mother like Jodi that would help her child to grow to their full potential. A daughter needs her mother. Please give Jodi back her wrights that were wrongfully taken. The time taken away from Jodi can't be given back, but the situation can be corrected.

M
Mari Tellez
8 years ago

God bless

T
Triston sweat
8 years ago Featured

Shes a wonderful mother an she deserves to have her kids apart of her life , she doesnt deserve to have to go through this anymore after so many years , she should have every right to have her daughter apart of her life .

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

hope everything works out!

C
Christopher Tolen
8 years ago

Every parent deserves a chance!

J
Jodi Kovalchuk
8 years ago

Just so everyone knows, I also have a 10 year old daughter that I take care of on a regular basis, she is a well rounded child that behaves very well, I get compliments on her all the time how good she is. She lives with me full time and her father and I share her all the time. We never went to court and we don't fight over who's getting her. We share our time with her and put her first in our lives. So with that being said why wouldn't I want to see my other daughter? Why can I take care of one child but not the other? Plus my youngest daughter gets to see her sister when she visits my sister, so with that being said why would I not want to see my kid? It just doesn't make sense. The only thing that makes sense is that my oldest daughter's purported father doesn't want me and my child to have a relationship. Anyone who knows me knows I'm a good mom and sees me being a good mom.

B
Bernhard Behrens
8 years ago Featured

Judge Reynolds needs to removed from the bench as she, certainly in my case, finds her biases above the law.

J
Jodi Kovalchuk
8 years ago Featured

So the fact of the matter is that I was at court and I did do an appeal on the Judge so for Nicole to be correct the appeal wouldn't have happened IF I didn't show up to court. Stay tuned I will have the appeal case number up on this site very soon and anyone who wants to go to the appellate court to see the truth of the matter is welcome to because it is a public case. So I was at court and Nicole's little number chart means nothing but the fact that she and Sean are very scared of this petition

N
Nicole Hickman
8 years ago

Below is the court information for the date that you did not, in fact, show up to. Just so we're clear. No. 05D279009 This cause coming to be heard on Petitioner's Motion for suspended visitation, all parties being advised of the premises, Petitioner pro se, and this court having jurisdiction over the subject matter, after hearing, THE COURT FINDS: 1.) Respondent did not appear despite notice of today's date. 2.) Respondent's visitation with the minor child has previously been suspended, but telephone contact allowed. 3.) Respondent's telephone contact to the minor child has been inconsistent, infrequent, inappropriate, harassing, and intending to intentionally interfere with petitioner and the minor child. 4.) The minor child is in therapy to deal with the loss/separation issues caused by Respondent's inappropriate behavior. 5.) Continued contact between Respondent and the minor child would potentially cause additional harm to the minor child. 6.) Respondent's actions constitute a serious endangerment to the minor child. 7.) Respondent left a voice mail message on 11/11/12 to the Petitioner threatening him, her own parents, and the judge. The voice mail message was played in open court. IT IS HEARBY ORDERED: 1.) The motion to suspend telephone contact is granted. Respondent is a serious endangerment to the minor child. Respondent is prohibited from any contact with the minor child until further order in court.