This whole thing is a mess. We deserve to hear from the lawyer directly instead of getting these scary emails from the board.
L
Linda Conway
4 years ago
Featured
Unit 204. Totally agree that we need a meeting before any money gets moved around. This is our life savings we are talking about.
M
Mark Ortega
4 years ago
Featured
So tired of the runaround. Stop hiding behind the lawyers and give us some real answers about the building safety.
D
Daniel McCann
4 years ago
Cranecrest #310
Valerie McCann Bucek
A
Apartment 505
4 years ago
Thank you! Apt. 505
S
Simon and Tamara Zalevsky
4 years ago
I agree
Simon #705
J
John Farrar Unit 509
4 years ago
I do not have email
R
Richard Marcil
4 years ago
I support this petition 100%
J
John Fox
4 years ago
Unit 211
M
Michael Gertner
4 years ago
Featured
I support the homeowners in order for a fair resolution with respect to coming to a solution so that the board and the home owners can come together on the issues.
R
Robert Galante
4 years ago
Unit 508
J
Jacqueline Price
· petition starter
4 years ago
This is an excellent summary of what the IRS and other entities describe as a capital improvement. To me it seems VERY clear that this project is exactly that. http://camcontracting.com/capital-improvements-vs-repairs-whats-the-difference
R
Richard barbato
4 years ago
Very interested in the building Dept report
M
Marc André Theoret
4 years ago
Do sign the petition
P
Paul Sacco
4 years ago
I have never been involved in such chaos or stupidity
R
Robert J Matarazzo
4 years ago
I support this letter. Unit 202
J
James and Ann Conway
4 years ago
Featured
We thought that there had to be Bids from several contractors before it was decided Unit 110
C
Constance Kramer
4 years ago
Unit 602
S
Sal Fiore
4 years ago
Unit 905.
G
Geryl Silver
4 years ago
Featured
The board should NOT use the $3.9 million number at this time as we do not know what we will find. As I mentioned, the assessment can always be modified. This is preposterous to make owners pay so much without actual invoices etc.. Very very disappointed that the board feels it is correct and ok to assess owners like this. Alot of owners are on Social Security and this is their only means of income. Also not okay with the way certain male members of the board spoke down to in a derogatory manner and dismissed what was said by certain women owners.
This whole thing is a mess. We deserve to hear from the lawyer directly instead of getting these scary emails from the board.
Unit 204. Totally agree that we need a meeting before any money gets moved around. This is our life savings we are talking about.
So tired of the runaround. Stop hiding behind the lawyers and give us some real answers about the building safety.
Cranecrest #310 Valerie McCann Bucek
Thank you! Apt. 505
I agree Simon #705
I do not have email
I support this petition 100%
Unit 211
I support the homeowners in order for a fair resolution with respect to coming to a solution so that the board and the home owners can come together on the issues.
Unit 508
This is an excellent summary of what the IRS and other entities describe as a capital improvement. To me it seems VERY clear that this project is exactly that. http://camcontracting.com/capital-improvements-vs-repairs-whats-the-difference
Very interested in the building Dept report
Do sign the petition
I have never been involved in such chaos or stupidity
I support this letter. Unit 202
We thought that there had to be Bids from several contractors before it was decided Unit 110
Unit 602
Unit 905.
The board should NOT use the $3.9 million number at this time as we do not know what we will find. As I mentioned, the assessment can always be modified. This is preposterous to make owners pay so much without actual invoices etc.. Very very disappointed that the board feels it is correct and ok to assess owners like this. Alot of owners are on Social Security and this is their only means of income. Also not okay with the way certain male members of the board spoke down to in a derogatory manner and dismissed what was said by certain women owners.