To: All consumers concerned with the integrity of the National Organic Program.
We, the undersigned, demand that the National Organic Program accept the 2010 NOSB recommendation to prohibit soil-less hydroponic vegetable production as certified organic.
My name is Dave Chapman and I am the owner/grower at Long Wind Farm. We grow organic tomatoes in our 2 acre greenhouse in East Thetford, Vermont. We have been certified organic since the Vermont Organic Farmers (VOF) began in 1985. We were one of the original 13 farms certified organic by VOF. There has been tremendous growth of certified organic production worldwide since those small beginnings.
I am doing this because of my deep concern about a failure in the process of maintaining the national organic standards. The way that the national standards work is that there is a group of federal bureaucrats (called the National Organic Program, or NOP) responsible for defining and administering organic standards for the United States. Then there is a committee of 15 people (called the National Organic Standards Board, or NOSB) selected from the farming and academic communities who make informed recommendations to the NOP. It is very rare for the NOP to go against the NOSB, which is charged with the mission of representing the organic community.
In 2010 the NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) submitted a recommendation to the NOP (National Organic Program) that hydroponic production NOT be certified as organic. (See below). Until that time the issue of soil-less growing had never been addressed by the NOP, so the the NOP asked the NOSB to come up with a recommendation. The NOSB voted 12 to 1 (with 2 abstentions) to prohibit hydroponic production. The recommendations of the NOSB are almost always accepted by the NOP, but in this case the NOP has not acted on the NOSB recommendation, and the NOP continues to allow hydroponic production to be certified as organic. The NOP has not offered any guidance to certifying agencies on this matter.
Presently, the vast majority of the “hydroponic organic” produce sold in this country is grown in either Mexico, Canada, or Holland. ALL THREE OF THESE COUNTRIES PROHIBIT HYDROPONICALLY PRODUCED VEGETABLES TO BE SOLD AS ORGANIC IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES. Mexico, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and 24 European countries, (including Holland, England, Germany, Italy, France, and Spain) all prohibit hydroponic vegetable production to be sold as organic in their own countries. The NOSB has formally recommended that the United States join the international community in this common definition of organic produce. The USA is very isolated in the decision to allow “organic hydroponic.”
Hydroponic growing is a soil-less system in which all the nutrients are supplied to the plants through an irrigation system. There is no soil involved. There is no reliance on the microbial activity of the soil to provide the biological diversity that is the basis of organic growing. Hydroponic growing is the polar opposite of the old organic adage, “Feed the soil, not the plant.” Hydroponic growing is based on the belief, “Feed the plant, not the soil.”
The stated NOP standard emphasizes that organic growing is based on caring for the soil. (See below), but their refusal to prohibit soil-less growing defies their own standard.
Now is the time for the community of organic consumers to make their position clear to the National Organic Program. Please vote to support the following proposition:
Link to the NOSB Recommendation to the NOP on soil-less production: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5084677NOP Standard on soil:
§205.203 Soil fertility and crop nutrient management practice standard.
(a) The producer must select and implement tillage and cultivation practices that maintain or improve the physical, chemical, and biological condition of soil and minimize soil erosion.
(b) The producer must manage crop nutrients and soil fertility through rotations, cover crops, and the application of plant and animal materials.
(c) The producer must manage plant and animal materials to maintain or improve soil organic matter content in a manner that does not contribute to contamination of crops, soil, or water by plant nutrients, pathogenic organisms, heavy metals, or residues of prohibited substances.
Updates
June 18, 2015
The petition has reached one thousand signatures. This milestone confirms that a significant number of consumers share our commitment to maintaining the integrity of organic standards.
Reached 1,000 supporters
June 16, 2015
January 1, 2014
The petition has now reached one hundred signatures from individuals who value the integrity of soil-based agriculture. This initial response demonstrates that many consumers remain committed to the original principles of the organic movement.
Reached 100 supporters
December 30, 2013
349 Comments
It is not only the highly synthesized inputs that flies in the face of the organic framework, but the enormous inflows of water and energy required to operate a hydroponic system that renders is unsustainable in the larger picture.
Oranic is all about developing the soil. Therefore plants fed only a liquid fertilizer diet do not have the benefit of growing in fertile soil and breaking down the soil with their enzimes to consume the valuable micronutrients that benefit me when I consume them.
As the former manager of VT Northern Growers Coop, a farmer owned and operated organic cooperative in the late 1970s and 80s, I fully support this petition drive. The basis of organic farming/gardening resides in the fertility and tilth of the soil, not chemically fed water.
I am a farmer, in soil, and agree that soiless growing has absolutely nothing to do with true organically grown plants. Organic production is a combination of soil, soil organisms, organic matter, minerals, atomic elements, and seeds and the farmer must be a steward of them all.
As a former member of NYS Natural Organic Farmers Associations Organic Certification Standards Board, I (1985 to 1988) object to the inclusion of soil-less hydroponic systems as being organic. You can grow waercress that way using natural spring water.
Keep the soil in organic.
Leave Mother Earth alone or she will swallow you up!
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
To: All consumers concerned with the integrity of the National Organic Program.
We, the undersigned, demand that the National Organic Program accept the 2010 NOSB recommendation to prohibit soil-less hydroponic vegetable production as certified organic.
My name is Dave Chapman and I am the owner/grower at Long Wind Farm. We grow organic tomatoes in our 2 acre greenhouse in East Thetford, Vermont. We have been certified organic since the Vermont Organic Farmers (VOF) began in 1985. We were one of the original 13 farms certified organic by VOF. There has been tremendous growth of certified organic production worldwide since those small beginnings.
I am doing this because of my deep concern about a failure in the process of maintaining the national organic standards. The way that the national standards work is that there is a group of federal bureaucrats (called the National Organic Program, or NOP) responsible for defining and administering organic standards for the United States. Then there is a committee of 15 people (called the National Organic Standards Board, or NOSB) selected from the farming and academic communities who make informed recommendations to the NOP. It is very rare for the NOP to go against the NOSB, which is charged with the mission of representing the organic community.
In 2010 the NOSB (National Organic Standards Board) submitted a recommendation to the NOP (National Organic Program) that hydroponic production NOT be certified as organic. (See below). Until that time the issue of soil-less growing had never been addressed by the NOP, so the the NOP asked the NOSB to come up with a recommendation. The NOSB voted 12 to 1 (with 2 abstentions) to prohibit hydroponic production. The recommendations of the NOSB are almost always accepted by the NOP, but in this case the NOP has not acted on the NOSB recommendation, and the NOP continues to allow hydroponic production to be certified as organic. The NOP has not offered any guidance to certifying agencies on this matter.
Presently, the vast majority of the “hydroponic organic” produce sold in this country is grown in either Mexico, Canada, or Holland. ALL THREE OF THESE COUNTRIES PROHIBIT HYDROPONICALLY PRODUCED VEGETABLES TO BE SOLD AS ORGANIC IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES. Mexico, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and 24 European countries, (including Holland, England, Germany, Italy, France, and Spain) all prohibit hydroponic vegetable production to be sold as organic in their own countries. The NOSB has formally recommended that the United States join the international community in this common definition of organic produce. The USA is very isolated in the decision to allow “organic hydroponic.”
Hydroponic growing is a soil-less system in which all the nutrients are supplied to the plants through an irrigation system. There is no soil involved. There is no reliance on the microbial activity of the soil to provide the biological diversity that is the basis of organic growing. Hydroponic growing is the polar opposite of the old organic adage, “Feed the soil, not the plant.” Hydroponic growing is based on the belief, “Feed the plant, not the soil.”
The stated NOP standard emphasizes that organic growing is based on caring for the soil. (See below), but their refusal to prohibit soil-less growing defies their own standard.
Now is the time for the community of organic consumers to make their position clear to the National Organic Program. Please vote to support the following proposition:
Link to the NOSB Recommendation to the NOP on soil-less production: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC5084677NOP Standard on soil:
§205.203 Soil fertility and crop nutrient management practice standard.
(a) The producer must select and implement tillage and cultivation practices that maintain or improve the physical, chemical, and biological condition of soil and minimize soil erosion.
(b) The producer must manage crop nutrients and soil fertility through rotations, cover crops, and the application of plant and animal materials.
(c) The producer must manage plant and animal materials to maintain or improve soil organic matter content in a manner that does not contribute to contamination of crops, soil, or water by plant nutrients, pathogenic organisms, heavy metals, or residues of prohibited substances.
Updates
June 18, 2015
The petition has reached one thousand signatures. This milestone confirms that a significant number of consumers share our commitment to maintaining the integrity of organic standards.
Reached 1,000 supporters
June 16, 2015
January 1, 2014
The petition has now reached one hundred signatures from individuals who value the integrity of soil-based agriculture. This initial response demonstrates that many consumers remain committed to the original principles of the organic movement.
Reached 100 supporters
December 30, 2013
349 Comments
Classic hydroponic production in nutrient enriched water is completely inconsistent with the principles of organic agriculture and furthermore it is inconsistent with most other organic regulations worldwide including Canada and the European Union, which prohibit this practice
It is not only the highly synthesized inputs that flies in the face of the organic framework, but the enormous inflows of water and energy required to operate a hydroponic system that renders is unsustainable in the larger picture.
Oranic is all about developing the soil. Therefore plants fed only a liquid fertilizer diet do not have the benefit of growing in fertile soil and breaking down the soil with their enzimes to consume the valuable micronutrients that benefit me when I consume them.
As the former manager of VT Northern Growers Coop, a farmer owned and operated organic cooperative in the late 1970s and 80s, I fully support this petition drive. The basis of organic farming/gardening resides in the fertility and tilth of the soil, not chemically fed water.
I am a farmer, in soil, and agree that soiless growing has absolutely nothing to do with true organically grown plants. Organic production is a combination of soil, soil organisms, organic matter, minerals, atomic elements, and seeds and the farmer must be a steward of them all.
As a former member of NYS Natural Organic Farmers Associations Organic Certification Standards Board, I (1985 to 1988) object to the inclusion of soil-less hydroponic systems as being organic. You can grow waercress that way using natural spring water.
Keep the soil in organic.
Leave Mother Earth alone or she will swallow you up!
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 1,500 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Make your voice count today!
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Classic hydroponic production in nutrient enriched water is completely inconsistent with the principles of organic agriculture and furthermore it is inconsistent with most other organic regulations worldwide including Canada and the European Union, which prohibit this practice