Skip to main content

Como Congregational Bldg / Como Community Center / Concerned Como Neighbors

64 Comments

M
Mona Beckman
6 years ago

Not appropriate. I live one block over. Our neighborhood is being destroyed by multi dwelling housing.

J
John doran
6 years ago

Please keep our old beautiful neighborhood intact.watch lost twin cities on tpt 2 to understand why if your jury is still out on common sense!

S
Sarah Thompson
6 years ago

Stop!

M
Myra Burnette
6 years ago

Save this historic part of the neighborhood!

A
Allison Leding
6 years ago

I do not want a rooming house across from our duplex. Parking is bad enough already and this will set a precedent to have high density housing in the middle of a residential area. I am very opposed to this since there is enough high density housing close by,

K
Kari Haugh
6 years ago

This is a beautiful part of Minneapolis history, don’t tear her down!! The last thing the city needs is another horrid monster apartment building!!

M
Melissa Stanley
6 years ago

Residents in this neighborhood don't want it overly developed, so don't do it!

S
Sarah Muellerleile
6 years ago

This entire project is capitalistic in nature and Northland is patronizing the people of this neighborhood in their attempts to pander to what they think we want. What we really want is to keep the church the way it is.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Please do not destroy MORE OF MINNEAPOLIS / ST PAUL HISTORY..

A
Alem Ashenafi
6 years ago

Why the historic Church? Find open field to build your apartment. The church is part of our past and who we are

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

I grew up a little ways down from this church. It would be painful to see this history go.

T
Teri Libera
6 years ago

This is part of Minneapolis History and the Architecture is One-of-a-kind!!! Our Beautiful City doesn't need anymore Ugly Squarw Box Condo or Apt. Buildings!!! We need to START Preserving These Historical Buildings like this Church before they are ALL GONE!!!

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Como is in need of more community-oriented spaces, and this Church would be an obvious and fitting candidate for renovation and implementation as such a space. If higher density buildings are to be put in this neighborhood, they should certainly be alongside Como and Hennepin Avenues, not the interior streets. This proposal is almost certainly not being made out of genuine interest for strengthening Como as a community -- it's being made because it seems lucrative to property developers who likely have nothing to do with this neighborhood, and no interest in it besides eventually evolving it into a cleansed, character-devoid luxury wasteland like Dinkytown.

L
Leah Sainz
6 years ago

Please preserve the history of the neighborhood. Minneapolis is already full of barely affordable apartments.

A
Anatolio San Lucas
6 years ago

Preserving historical places and buildings is saving the history of the city , a city with no history is a body with no soul .

G
Gloria Sandberg
6 years ago

No stop any future plans of tearing down a historical building. This is a church with years of history in my family . This is not a site to place a large rental housing. Listen to the community who does not want this in a family housing neighborhood.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Save it

M
Matt Iversen
6 years ago

Do not put more apartments in our neighborhood

K
Kim Fortin
6 years ago

Stop tearing down old Minneapolis for depressing new apartment buildings

W
Wendy Menken
6 years ago

It would be a travesty to lose a historic building (one of the few remaining in Como) to a massive rooming house model that serves only one purpose - to make the developer richer - and does not provide a quality or affordable housing option for the market it claims. Just talk to students about how much they hate the multi-bedroom, living with strangers arrangement. Or ask Student Legal Services about how predatory a housing model it can be.