Skip to main content

Letter to County Council re Vacation Rentals

343 Comments

G
Gregory Oaksen
4 years ago

I think the VR cap should be based on Active and Compliant vacation rental permits not just compliant. We already have enough active permits!

L
Lynne Mercer
4 years ago

No more vacation rentals. Our neighborhoods are turning into transient housing.

A
Anonymous
4 years ago

Affordable housing please and Cost of living increases for elected officials should be your priority. Wait you’ve given yourselves raises

K
Kenneth ferrugiaro
4 years ago

Power pissing on the public

L
Lisa Byers
4 years ago

An adage I have heard often is that people are drawn to the San Juans for their natural beauty, and they decided to stay because of the community. An important part of that community for many of us is neighborhood life. The sharing and caring that goes on when we know people who live next door. Please stand up for community by voting for a cap of 413 vacation rentals. Thank you.

L
Lynne Davies
4 years ago

Your first decision was the right one. The shameful reversal further erodes the ability to house workers to maintain a healthy and prosperous community. Please rethink this latest decision.

D
Donald english
4 years ago

We need caps - NOW!

R
Ronda Jones
4 years ago

Growth is inevitable. Let’s be mindful in attaining a sustainable future for all, including those that actually live in SJC. You have the power to make a difference. Please do your job and "plan" accordingly, for the greater good, not only the 1%.

K
Kai Sanburn
4 years ago

Your unanimous decision in August was the right one. It respected the ample feedback of residents and small businesses that our communities are maxed out at current visitor levels, while honoring the rights of existing compliant VR permit holders. Stand with those speaking on behalf of our community and environmental well-being. You got it right in August - go back and do that again. -- Thank you for your commitment.

P
pat torpie
4 years ago

shameful...

J
Joyce Brinar
4 years ago

Very disappointed

R
Richard Ward
4 years ago

WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING? WE ALREADY FEEL EXPLOITED.

E
Edmund Sheridan
4 years ago

We have a crisis in the San Juans. Our new teachers, government workers, our health care workers can not find rental housing.

S
Sam Bernardi
4 years ago

Honor your previous decision and the will of San Juan County residents.

B
B Sadie Bailey
4 years ago

In previous Council hearings on VRs, Jamie Stephens admitted that Eastsound UGA is "bleeding vacation rentals." So why, and HOW, did you decide to recommend that we still should have SO MANY MORE than Friday Harbor UGA on a land mass full of critical areas? Please explain yourselves! (and thank you to those Planning Commissioners who voted against raising the cap!)

C
CedarBough Saeji
4 years ago

How could you betray local PEOPLE (not businesses) by reversing the previous decision? You should be ashamed. Listen to the voters in San Juan County!!!

S
Steven Wrubleski
4 years ago

money money money Tell me one good thing that increasing the number of vacation rentals does for the community at large. You commissioners should be ashamed.

M
Michael Johnson
4 years ago

Regardless of whether you're a tourist, resident, or a business owner, over-tourism is not in anybody's best long-term interests. Short-term vacation rentals represent the tipping point of over-tourism in the San Juans, and like all land-uses should be highly regulated, and have limits.

S
Summer moon scriver
4 years ago

Money is not the most important objective, we need to protect our island and its natural resources and the working class that can’t even afford to live here!

P
Patricia Ward
4 years ago

The needs of the people living in the islands need to be respected over those who are making money by tourism in the islands