Skip to main content

Letter to County Council re Vacation Rentals

343 Comments

E
Eden Zillioux
4 years ago

Welcome to commodity island! Come exploit the resources, harass the wildlife, fight for bottled water at the market, stand in line for 40 minutes waiting for someone who lives in a shack to make you a sandwich, and enjoy stopping your bicycle in the middle of the road to check your map. Ah, the luxury of hospitality!

M
Mark C Ingman
4 years ago

VRs need to be reduced, not increased!

S
Stu and Patsy Stephens
4 years ago

Please freeze VR permits to current number of 413

C
Clayton Parsons
4 years ago

Enough is enough ! Cap and then reduce the number of Vacation rentals in San Juan County.

S
Sue DuMond
4 years ago

Please honor your original decision to cap vacation permits. Stop selling out our islands!

B
Beverly Hanna
4 years ago

Freeze the number of Vacation permits

M
Michael E Yeaman
4 years ago

Stay with the 413....don't reverse your original opinion!

S
Sheryl Perryman
4 years ago

Please decrease the number of Vacation Home Tentals.

A
Anonymous
4 years ago

The future of the San Juans is dire. There is already not enough housing thanks to the insane number of vacation rentals. Stores and restaurants ARE ALREADY CLOSING BECAUSE THERE IS NO HOUSING FOR STAFF. Please. The cap limit SHOULD be a fraction of what it is. Please stick with the lower number. The rich people will still be rich if they rent to people who actually live and work here, rather than just party here. Please. Make 413 the county cap.

A
Anonymous
4 years ago

more agricultural lands available to young farmers!

S
San Olson
4 years ago

Why allow “inactive” permit holders to be added to the permanent cap limit? They have chosen by not being “active and compliant” to remove themselves from the current VR business. The proliferation of short term rentals is the slippery slope to over-tourism which will destroy the environment and character of these islands. The supporting infrastructure and limited resources, including transportation and potable water, is already burdened. Your previous decision was correct. Please respect and reflect the wishes of the many long term residents from all islands. They are the witnesses to the impact, believe them. Cap the short term rentals at 413. Rentals where the owner resides on the property or rents space within their home should be a separate category and not counted within the cap.

M
Millicent Vetterlein
4 years ago

Honor the August 20th decision.! Honor the island citizens who have worked to make this cap that benefits many interests.

J
John Dey
4 years ago

The VR cap is a measurable, quantifiable was to accurately assess the impact of VR on the cost of housing and this costs effect on maintaining a stable, sustainable workforce in SJC. Do the right thing. Honor the lives of the people you were elected to serve by honoring the 413 cap.

P
Pat Littlewood
4 years ago

Please maintain our connection to the natural environment and refrain from further over-development.

P
Patricia Frances
4 years ago

Please keep your original commitment that provides some protection from our islands' degradation. Why does it seem so impossible to maintain integrity towards the will of the people? Do the right thing please!

S
Susan Daly
4 years ago

Too many long term rentals have gone to the transient rental side. Maybe the original cap size will encourage a return to long term ADUs.

K
Kathi Anderson
4 years ago

Honor your commitment to the August cap you agreed to and announced to the public.

H
Heather Dew Oaksen
4 years ago

Please save our residential neighborhoods and rural character by maintaining your original unanimous decision to freeze vacation rental caps at the current Active and compliant number of 413.

K
Ken Kortge
4 years ago

Please keep VR's capped at the number agreed upon in August.

V
Vivien Burnett
4 years ago

too many vacation rentals! honor your commitment